The wiki is also not the only truth.
Peter - you get all sorts of rendering issues when you attach layer
tags to objects that are typically drawn over-size (eg roads). So if
someone has gone to the trouble of putting something that is typically
below street level (eg a stream) to a consistent
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:22 PM, monxton gm...@jordan-maynard.org wrote:
So I hope his sense of humour is robust enough for me to
mention that it's 3.5 years since since the schedule for rendering the
National Byway was this week.
eeek!
Let's face it though, in the face of trying to keep
Thanks for response Andy. I'm with you regarding tagging the NB as ncn= for
the reasons you give. Appreciate all your hard work in keeping the cyclemap
up and running. It's a fantastic resource.
On your note re Sustrans walking/cycling I did the same chuckle. I'm also
surprised that they haven't
Andy Allan wrote:
If we keep the route=bicycle I would suggest network=ncn,
name = National Byway and therefore bring it into line with
all the other national cycling routes in every other country
in OSM.
Strongly disagree. But then you know that. :)
I think the root (route?) problem is
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I think the root (route?) problem is that we're tagging everything as
networks even if they're not. I've been as guilty as anyone of this: when
I mapped the Four Castles Cycle Route around Abergavenny, I tagged it
Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net] wrote:
Sent: 20 April 2011 10:17 AM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway rendering on OpenCycleMap
Andy Allan wrote:
If we keep the route=bicycle I would suggest network=ncn, name =
National Byway and therefore bring
On 20 April 2011 10:46, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
Ooh, a golden opportunity to point out (to Richard of all people :-) )
that the key / value pairs are just arbitrary UTF8 strings and can
mean whatever we want them to mean. So the letters n-e-t-w-o-r-k
Peter Miller wrote:
What tagging would you expect us to use within OSM to identify
something as being part of this network?
Just route=bicycle, name=National Byway should be enough IMO. I wouldn't
really call the National Byway a network - it's a circular route with the
odd spur - but I guess
On 20 April 2011 12:11, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
What tagging would you expect us to use within OSM to identify
something as being part of this network?
Just route=bicycle, name=National Byway should be enough IMO. I wouldn't
really call the
On 20/04/2011 11:24, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
This raises an important point that cropped up last week in Brum where Brian
had tagged a serious of routes that the local campaign group, Pushbikes, are
promoting. The issue was that these routes don't exist on the ground. Like a
bus
I have created a new ITO Map overlay showing highway=byway in red and
designation=restricted_byway in blue. It would also show ways with
route=bicycle and name=National Byway as a thick green line, however there
aren't any that I can see as yet.
You can try it here:
Peter Miller wrote:
I can't see any obvious instances of this tagging in the database at
present. Can you give me some example ways?
Ah, well, if you're asking about how it's tagged at present: it's grouped
in _relations_ (as cycle routes usually are) which have tags
route=bicycle,
On 20/04/2011 12:11, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
What tagging would you expect us to use within OSM to identify
something as being part of this network?
Just route=bicycle, name=National Byway should be enough IMO. I wouldn't
really call the National Byway a network - it's a
On 20/04/2011 10:03, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
On your note re Sustrans walking/cycling I did the same chuckle. I'm also
surprised that they haven't yet changed the standard ranger sticker from the
cycling one to the one that adds the pedestrian at the top as well. Every
ranger
On 20/04/2011 12:31, Peter Miller wrote:
I have created a new ITO Map overlay showing highway=byway in red and
designation=restricted_byway in blue. It would also show ways with
route=bicycle and name=National Byway as a thick green line, however
there aren't any that I can see as yet.
You can
Peter Miller peter.miller@... writes:
It it is in a cutting the the 'cutting' tag would be appropriate. because the
layer tag saying nothing about relative height to a parallel way, only about
the z ordering at crossing points.
This is the problem - there are two different conventions for the
On 20/04/2011 13:19, monxton wrote:
The National Byway is currently tagged as :
route=bicycle
network=national_byway
name=National Byway (region name)
but the proposal being discussed here is to change to network=ncn
I started one of the older threads on the same topic, so I've been
17 matches
Mail list logo
