In the end there were just three of us made it to King's Lynn last
Saturday week. We achieved a lot, but couldn't hope to cover the entire
town. So I'm trying to raise interest again - hey c'mon they have
numbers in double figures elsewhere.
So if you're interested, would you like to indicate
I've had notification (via Cambridge Cycling Campaign) about a scheme
whereby Cambridgeshire County Council will put community groups (which I
think could very reasonably include OpenStreetMap in the Interest,
hobbies and arts groups category) in touch with minibus operators
(particularly
Cambridgeshire County Council has registered us for this scheme (ref
BKG0031), so if we need a community minibus for a mapping part, we can
get one (of course, we'd need to pay for the use of it, but should be
much cheaper than renting one).
David
David Earl wrote:
I've had notification (via
On 20/08/2009 16:46, Richard Smith wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Ed Loach wrote:
David asked:
This Cambs CC press release suggests a minor mod to the map is
needed.
Is anyone near? It's probably not worth me travelling specially
to
Huntingdon, but if anyone could cover it, that would be
On 14/10/2009 13:40, David Earl wrote:
As I mentioned, I'd like to promote a Wisbech mapping party.
There's a sign up page now:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fenland/WisbechMappingParty2009-11
David
___
Talk-gb-midanglia mailing list
Talk-gb
On 09/11/2009 15:15, David Earl wrote:
Their page doesn't call it a bridleway either
Actually, following the link in the corner to
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/transport/thebusway/community/rights/
it then says:
New bridleway and cycleway: To make sure people can still enjoy this
route
Original Message
Subject:National Trust Press Release - Reach Bridge Brings Lodes Way a
Step Closer
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:17:18 -
From: Cooper, Howard howard.coo...@nationaltrust.org.uk
5 March 2010
*Reach** Bridge** Brings Lodes Way a Step Closer*
**
On 10/08/2010 21:31, Richard Moss wrote:
On Tue 10/08/10 16:36 , David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
sent:
I'm doing a printed cycle map which covers, among other places,
Huntingdon. This needs to include the old Houghton Road which has
been re-opened for bikes and buses since I surveyed
I did the same around Teversham/Cherry Hinton last week, and also looked
at what I'd need to do to replace unlicensed contributions. I've written
personally to the following:
smncrsk
Martin Green
user_4538
Roman
Robert Duncan
Dave Tracey
NickF
HendrikG
Simon Proven
of which only the last has
It's signposted as a bridleway (only the northern section), so it is
technically correct. On the basis of map whatbyou see on the ground, thats
a valid change. So long as it have bicycle=yes, and retains the NCN
information, I don't think it matters that much. Oliver is right though,
use by horses
On 16/09/2013 10:08, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:58 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
It's signposted as a bridleway (only the northern section), so it is
technically correct. On the basis of map whatbyou see
On 16/09/2013 12:52, Oliver Jowett wrote:
I'll try to ride the length of the path some time checking what exactly
is signposted.
http://www.cyclestreets.net/location/32577/
I wonder if cyclestreets assigns different costs to highway=bridleway vs
highway=cycleway? It does show them
On Saturday I was thinking I'd wander up to Ely (pop ~15,000) with my bike
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/index.html?lat=52.399834lon=0.263128zoom=11)
and survey as much of it as I can (there's a small amount already done in
the middle but not much else).
Would anyone like to join me? It's a bit
So what you are really saying here is we would concentrate on the natural
rather than the built environment. That seems logical to me for
the reasons
you give.
Places (place names) were my starting point, definitely the built
environment! So we get a full gazetteer.
David
Thanks, Nick, this looks very useful.
A couple of things:
- the tag editor pane pops up on top of the map, so it often covers up the
thing I'm trying to read off the map. I wonder if you could (a) make the
text smaller and closer together and then make the pane smaller, maybe use
width more than
further west, I get
several near Fishguard, some of which were my additions yesterday.
I'm using Firefox on Windows.
David
-Original Message-
From: Nick Whitelegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 May 2007 10:44
To: David Earl
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB
I have been wondering about postcodes. We have a postal_code tag which can
be applied to streets and it would be nice to collect these. However it is
not something like name plates that you find in the street by observation.
There are about 2 million postcodes in the UK, so gathering them manually
Nick,
There seems to be a problem whereby the POI editor gets 500 errors from the
server whenever a place name (and presumably other tag values as well) has a
single quote in the name:
name=Bishop's Castle always fails
name=Bishops Castle works
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Williams
Sent: 29 May 2007 16:14
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Online POI editor
forplacemappingparty-usabilityenhancements
On Monday 28 May 2007 19:30, David Earl wrote
On 08/08/2007 14:37, Dave_A_F wrote:
The rendering problem is fixed by adding the appropriate osmarender tags
to instruct it not to render Name or Ref for the bridge.
I am fixing this and other similar where ref or name are on roundabouts
in any places I go.
These tags are also useful
On 17/12/2007 10:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Andy R., Andy A.,
And map features is not a voted-on only list. Anyone can add what
they like
and others can change what they like. It's a wiki page. I just added
landuse=military btw. If someone doesn't like that one then they
are free to
On 17/12/2007 11:16, Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
David Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
But if people use random tags to describe objects for which consensus
already exists, then we have anarchy and the map will be completely
unusable.
This is why I think deriving the list
On 09/02/2008 18:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Seems that I have got Camden and Cambridge mixed up in my previous mail.
Does anyone know who is involved in the Camden one?
Yes, it's George Coulouris: george at coulouris dot net
We (I say 'we' with my Cambridge Cycling Campaign hat on, though I'm
On 30/03/2008 16:51, Steve Chilton wrote:
Anyone interested in canals in UK, and river detail in their own area, might
like to check out
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~steve8/canal.html
Use it to find gaps or errors in the data, and if possible corect or add to
it.
Someone changed the River
A couple of us will be starting on Royston, Herts this coming Friday.
It's only 15,000+ people, so it will take a couple of sessions - unless
that is, someone else wants to join us, in which case we can get it done
in one day.
If anyone's interested, do get in touch directly. I'm expecting to
I'd probably take part, again if the starting point is on the rail
network (Boston is).
Boston is 55,000+ people. So that's 55 person hours of on the ground
surveying, so quite a challenge for a weekend if you want to do rural
roads too, unless there's a big crowd of volunteers.
Spalding is a
Just a reminder that the Bury St Edmunds mapping party is this weekend,
16/17 August.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/BuryStEdmunds/MappingParty2008-08
I'll send out a press release about it today.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 24/09/2008 09:56, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Dave Stubbs wrote:
whether you can just cycle the wrong way down
the road avoiding any on coming cars.
I _think_ that is illegal in the UK anyway isn't it?
On 24/09/2008 11:46, Dave Stubbs wrote:
cycleway=opposite_lane you mean?
Yes, sorry.
Or we start a guerilla campaign to fix the tagging at source... a few
fake oneway signs, a hammer, and some cable ties should do the trick.
Now there's an interesting thought: instead of changing the map to
On 04/12/2008 12:59, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
in Germany we have yellow signs
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ortstafel) that tell you when you're
legally entering a city/town/village traffic area. In such a traffic
area (geschlossene Ortschaft), reduced default speed limits apply.
On 23/12/2008 14:48, Peter Miller wrote:
I am pleased to be able to announce that after discussions between
various OSM contributors and the DfT / Traveline over the past months we
are now able to make this announcement just in time for Xmas :)
---
The UK Department for Transport,
On 10/02/2009 20:32, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
In Birmingham we have A B Row, which while not being perhaps the shortest
street (though it is exceedingly short) it is the shortest name. ...
Blaenavon in Gwent also has a set of streets named A Row, B Row etc.
David
On 24/02/2009 16:51, Axel Jacobs wrote:
I ran a little script against the data base of planning applications
of Islington Council and ended up with around 16,500 address. ...
So I was wondering if others have done the same for their area, and
how to best share this data. Has anybody
On 25/02/2009 09:53, Dave Stubbs wrote:
2009/2/24 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk:
Clennam Street is not on OSM, which is shame if the street has
this
dubious honour of being the shortest.
Not living anywhere near, I wonder if someone nearer might like
to pop
round to get London's Shortest
On 09/03/2009 12:04, Peter Miller wrote:
We are planning to give the UK administrative wiki pages a bit of a
spring clean which are all a bit random, not very well linked and
contain quite a lot of duplicated content and some very out-of-date
content.
Quite a lot of the Cambs/West
On 18/03/2009 11:21, Ed Loach wrote:
one in Bury St Edmunds is tagged landuse=industrial (with a
visitor
centre attraction).
That was me. It really is a factory, so I felt industrial was
appropriate.
No, I agree. I've seen the place and it is very industrial. But
landuse to me seems more
On 03/04/2009 12:42, Richard Mann wrote:
*** I would like feedback/discussion on this particular point - whether
urban made-up and rural unmade footpaths should be tagged distinctively ***
Given we already have a separate tag for surface, I don't see the
distinction.
In highway engineering
On 03/04/2009 14:11, Steve Hill wrote:
However, mistake or not, we have what we have and making fundamental
changes doesn't seem especially likely (I have in the past made
suggestions regarding the fundamental data structure and have been met
with nothing but sarcastic replies and put-downs
On 18/05/2009 16:28, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
Tom Hughes wrote:
I normally just use tertiary for roads which are not A/B but are
significant through roads of some sort.
+1
+1 also
The C classification is just not available on the ground, and is in
practice only of use to highway
New Scietists covered this more than a month ago, and has another
article this week:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227085.700-ageing-satellites-put-gps-at-risk.html
which references the original report on which this story has been based
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09325.pdf
David
On
For those not subscribed to talk-gb-midanglia who may be interested: I'm
organising a mapping party for King's Lynn, West Norfolk on June 27th.
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norfolk/King's_Lynn_and_West_Norfolk/MappingParty2009-06
David
On 03/06/2009 11:42, Bob Kerr wrote:
The maps are copyright free and can be used in their magazine
Err... they aren't copyright free.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
There is no right answer. If you tag things 40mph (which is what I do,
like most of the other people who've replied) then you may well find
that someone else goes round systematically changing them to km/h and
puts in maxspeed:mph - that's what's happened to most of the ones I've
done. I think
On 04/06/2009 12:48, WessexMario wrote:
Isn't all this already specified?
The trouble is tag specifications count for very little in OSM, as
people ignore them because they think they have a better way of doing
it, or when they make a mistake, or just on a whim. They're conventions
not
On 08/06/2009 13:06, Ed Loach wrote:
Jonathan asked:
Do we have an existing tagging scheme for these?
Yes
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_National_Cycle_Network#Tagging_information
That seems to be just mile posts. What about tagging the artwork?
What
http://realcycling.blogspot.com/2009/05/thames-crossings-21-and-32-dartford.html
(and you can also see in the photos that the signs change colour as you
approach the toll booths, where the motorway gives way to being a trunk
road just to go through the tunnel).
David
On 12/06/2009 11:46, Andy
Jack Stringer wrote:
As I have mentioned before I am interested in improving the data on
Amenities such as Pubs, Fast Food places. Most of this data can be
found openly on the companies own website so I doubt they will have
issues with us including the data as they want to be found on the
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/07/09 18:21, Chris Fleming wrote:
I find that the print in firefox works very well. The print stylesheet
ensures that only the required parts of the page get printed. The only
caveat, is that if I switch from portrait to landscape mode then the
attribution is printed
Tom Hughes wrote:
That's entirely a browser thing though, so different browsers may not do
exactly the same thing.
Curiously, IE8 produces 3 (!) pages in landscape, but all map - the area
you were seeing plus 1.5 pages worth to the south - BUT omits the
attribution completely.
David
Chris Hill wrote:
Since this is a Freedom of Information Act request, and they have
refused to supply me the requested information I'll ask the Office of
the Information Commissioner for a ruling. Not expecting much, but you
never know.
Even if they did or do supply it, doesn't mean you
Dave Stubbs wrote:
I really hope that this
central working group doesn't get distracted by every clown in the
world who messes with an area for a few hours after an evening in
the pub!
Most disappear quite happily without further interaction. The community
can handle the
Nicholas Barnes wrote:
Please could somebody give me some ideas about what (if anything) is
wrong with this whole roundabout/bus route/highway junction and what
should be done to sort it all out.
I was doing some bus routes for the first time recently too, and I think
there's a fundamental
Jack Stringer wrote:
St Neots, are there any locals that can tell me the area they want
GPSed as a priority?
Users Hook and Laverock have been going great guns recently in St Neots
and neighbouring Eynesbury and Eaton Ford.
David
___
Talk-GB
liam123 has been active again this morning - the first changeset for a
while:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2043351
I have no idea whether this represents valid data or rubbish. It seems
to be related to the high speed rail line through Kent.
David
David Earl wrote:
David Earl wrote:
liam123 has been active again this morning - the first changeset for a
while:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2043351
I have no idea whether this represents valid data or rubbish. It seems
to be related to the high speed rail line through
This time he's invented a fictitious railway line into Great Yarmouth
This needs reverting:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2063848
added to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=GB_revert_request_log
David
___
Talk-GB mailing
Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:21 PM, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
3 more changesets today from Liam123 for reversion.
I have added them to the revert page and have copied this email the
Andy.
Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I see little justification for not removing every edit done
by Liam123 until he talks to us or clearly starts to make good useful
contributions that we can verify. Can I ask you to reconsider you
decision and remove the changeset where he has made small
David Earl wrote:
I'll wrote to him/her.
Doh, my typing. 'write', of course. I've also added a feed on their
edits so I can keep an eye on them.
Fortunately these were largely isolated nodes, and no one had touched
them in the meantime.
Ito OSM Mapper has reported no changes in Cambridge
On 17/08/2009 13:28, Glenn Proctor wrote:
Following on from this, am I correct in assuming that the only
definitive source of mapping information about public rights of way is
the OS? It seems ludicrous that *public* rights of way are effectively
copyrighted in this manner. I suppose it's
I put a proposal on the wiki page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/Proposed_Chapters
for a central England OSM local chapter.
Peter disagrees with the (too small) scale of this and wants to discuss
it here.
I have no huge feelings about this. I just felt that we have
On 18/08/2009 12:42, Chris Hill wrote:
What is the point of local chapters in England? We don't have language
conversion issues, currency issues or time zone issues.
The main reason is one of the reasons behind the idea of local chapters
in the first place - to give an official point of
On 27/08/2009 10:31, Peter Childs wrote:
I mean if you look at the A2 it looks and feels like a Motor Way (Hard
Shoulder, Slipways, 70MPH) all the way till Wilmington it just happens
that Tractors and Learners are aloud to use it (I would not advise it
however).
and cyclists (ditto)
which
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4356960/history
No: I just did a search for a journey on the national rail website and
it gives me trains between the two stations either side, with
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows it
as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward vandalism
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5215590
Yes, looking at the Yahoo images, I agree completely.
I'm
On 03/09/2009 18:18, David Earl wrote:
I'm going to revert these two changesets now.
2359068 was OK, but the later one, 2359116 already has a conflict.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
I have now reverted this changeset - it went through cleanly and easily.
BTW for reverts I do I'm using a different user id from my usual -
GuardianAngel is me with a different hat on.
I wonder whether you could contact him again Peter and find out what he
did that led him to believe he wasn't
On 14/09/2009 22:30, Someoneelse wrote:
I notice that liam123's been editing in SE London again tonight. Seems
to consist of lots of oneway=yes changed to oneway=no, among others.
Unfortunately, I can't use the revert script to rever this. Though the
edits are all his, the same way appears
On 15/09/2009 00:59, Lennard wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't use the revert script to rever this. Though the
edits are all his, the same way appears twice in the same changeset
and this seems to upset Frederick's script. I don't know whether it is
a bug or not.
He
Two changesets:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510163 reverted cleanly
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510485 failed to revert
410 gone - I suspect there was a node/way changed in the second
changeset that was also in the first.
The automatic reversion is
On 17/09/2009 14:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Who would join a 'talk-counter_vandalism' list or support its creation?
Yes. But can we call it something less judgemental: not all incorrect
changes are vandalism, and people seeing their account names on such a
list would be most depressing.
On 17/09/2009 14:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Possibly a different name would be clearer
talk-Counter_vandalism_tools, but that is getting a bit long. Any other
ideas or feedback?
talk-reversion-tools?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 18/09/2009 11:17, Lennard wrote:
And about removal/deactivation/hiding of Potlatch's live editing mode:
yes, please. We've had a case in Belgium as well, recently, of someone
dicking about in live mode, apparently unaware of the destructive nature
of their actions.
+1
But I don't think
Well done, and congratulations! I saw the feed come through earlier on
this morning and have been working through reviewing the changes in my area.
In my so far futile attempts to reload the namefinder index, I've found
the same thing - the time to reload seems to be exponential with the
size.
On 18/09/2009 12:13, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Brian Prangle bpran...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I may be being a simpleton but can't we just disable write privileges for
this user to the database? Then he can continue editing but it all has no
effect
If somebody
On 19/09/2009 07:30, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have reverted the remaining edits so that, to my knowledge as per now,
not as single object should be in the state last modified by liam123.
Thank you very much for doing this.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing
As those of you paying attention will know, CycleStreets
(www.cyclestreets.net) is a routing and photo-map application for
cyclists based on OSM data.
It's primary developer is Simon Nuttall and he has been nominated for
TalkTalk's digital hero award, which offers a much needed £5K to help
I notice that we now have this area
name = Cambridge
public_transport = pay_scale_area
ref = CAMBDGE
source = naptan_import
which looks like it delimits the area within which the Cambridge
megarider bus tickets are valid (Pay scale area is not a term in
public parlance).
Problem is,
NPE maps have always had major alignment problems which have seemed to
me to be worse in the eastern side of the country. There's also a new
problem, but I don't know whether it is in the JOSM WMS plugin, the tile
server or what.
Consider three JOSM screenshots:
I'm planning a mapping party for the weekend of 14/15 November to map
Wisbech, Cambridgeshire and environs. Anyone fancy a weekend in the Fens?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fenland/WisbechMappingParty2009-11
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 15/10/2009 11:02, Ed Avis wrote:
Ed Loach e...@... writes:
As only Sealand recognise Sealand and no
UN member does (from the wiki article you quote), I can't see the
claim that the sea boundary of England is wrong can be justified.
Who would have expected an edit war in the English
it on, and take it off if they complain.
Richard
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/11/2009 13:21, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Nov 2009, at 12:41, Ed Avis wrote:
Are we legally permitted
On 10/11/2009 15:02, Richard Mann wrote:
But simply reproducing their name or logo to represent them is just free
advertising, and they'd be laughed out of court.
Rubbish. It's their property and they can decide who uses it and where.
They may well not have any objection, but if they did,
On 10/11/2009 19:35, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Nov 2009, at 19:05, Tom Chance wrote:
We get permission from TfL, or we seek costly legal advice.
I agree that the cautious approach would be to ask. I was wondering if
we could use the argument that it is in the background (as is a photo of
On 11/11/2009 10:39, Richard Mann wrote:
I found this a useful summary of the UK copyright position:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
That's about the general concept.
This was the reason for my comment that our use on a street map would be
akin to news reporting
to show their store locations on the map
were we to ask them, as essentially free advertising, and I do hope TfL
might be able to take that position also.
Many thanks,
David Earl
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
On 11/11/2009 12:40, Peter Miller wrote:
I do also agree with Richard in that there are numerous possible map
styles emphasising many different sorts of features in a lot of
different languages
Sure, but there are some that are so iconic they are the expectation.
And as others said and
On 11/11/2009 12:44, Peter Childs wrote:
OSM also has the advantage that you can render your map your self, If
you want Yellow Primary Roads, London Transport Symbol for train
stations etc etc then go ahead, If you infridge copy right on your own
rendering its not in the OSM data so OSM can't
There was an item on this lunchtime's You and Yours on BBC Radio 4 (a
consumer magazine programme) about mapping, Ordnance Survey and satnav,
which also mentioned OSM.
It's 35:30 minutes in at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/b00p4l7x
David
On 14/01/2010 18:27, Dave F. wrote:
Andy, The taxpayers have already paid for it, many times over. I resent
having to pay £7.50 for a map I've already financed to construct.
As I've paid for it, I think it should be given to me free of charge.
For a paper map, I think not. You've helped pay
Does anyone know what happens to ncn11 south of Stansted Mountfitchet?
I mapped it through to there a few months ago and then went back to
take it further but couldn't find it on the ground. I'd assumed it
followed the Lea valley maybe via Bishops Stortford and Harlow, but
the signs just
On 09/03/2010 11:29, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I'm currently trying to form a sort of consensus as to the best way of
defining the classes of highway in the US, and a bit of information
about the UK would help. I know about the definitions used
(trunk=primary route network, primary=A roads,
might be able to take
that position also. Many thanks, David Earl
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 25/03/2010 13:36, Thomas Wood wrote:
Wow, good work. I suppose this will start a flood of localisation
requests for other metro systems, this will probably be a good thing -
it'll force our mapnik localisation to be made better! (maybe I could
target it as a GSoC project for myself...)
As
I thought it was very interesting to look at the OS and OSM overlaid on
each other on the WMS link someone posted.
1. I was very impressed with how really accurate OSM is compared to OS
where I know it has been done systematically
2. I was disappointed to see how out of date the OS data is -
On 06/04/2010 17:51, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
A lot of stuff nowadays is done from aerial imagery, but they can still drop
back to traditional surveying methods if required.
It was a strange coincidence that I met an OS surveyor, theodolite in
hand, doing just that when I was
This reached me via a roundabout route about an event on Thursday late
afternoon. Is anyone from OSM involved? Is anyone going? Is someone in
the London area able to go? Looks light up our street, so to speak.
http://www.mappingforchange.org.uk
and in particular:
On Monday, November 1, 2010, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 29/10/2010 22:22, thomas van der veen wrote:
You might like to take note that nothing is implicit in OSM. There are no
defaults as renderers or
On Sunday, 26 December 2010, Richard r...@f2s.com wrote:
My personal opinion is that Signed on the ground should always take
precedence.
+1
But you can always use alt_ name where there is another variant (or
even completely different name).
David
On 21/01/2011 10:02, Kevin Peat wrote:
So I should delete the various admin boundaries in the db then as they
cannot be viewed on the ground?
Well said. I absolutely agree admin boundaries have the same kind of
status as postcodes.
I think there is value in visualising postcodes, and while
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
