On 30 Apr 2010, at 11:48, Andy Allan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-
chase.org.uk wrote:
But it
would be worth checking what strings are attached to the data by the
licensing.
Well, the licensing is pretty clear - it's been given to us under the
ODbL.
Hi,
I agree that the surrey air survey will be an amazing resource. But it
would be worth checking what strings are attached to the data by the
licensing. And also we need to consider the implications with our
CC-BY-SA and ODbL situation. I have added a wiki page as a place holder.
We need to
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:23 AM, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
But it
would be worth checking what strings are attached to the data by the
licensing.
Well, the licensing is pretty clear - it's been given to us under the
ODbL. Anyone feel qualified enough to suggest what that
On 30/04/2010 11:48, Andy Allan wrote:
However, the new owners of the imagery gave us it to use for tracing,
so I'm pretty sure any licensing issues are solvable technicalities,
so I'd say crack on with using it.
That's exactly what I've been doing. However, I've noticed a varying
amount of
By the looks of the imagery edges, it's made up out a of a huge number
of small images that seem to have very odd alignments.
I would guess form my experiance that the imagery has a general error
where there is an offset that covers the whole set, or large swathes
of it, caused by GPS drift, or
Anyone know where we are with this?
http://opengeodata.org/surrey-county-air-survey
http://opengeodata.org/surrey-county-air-surveyCheers,
Wilf.
m...@home
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 29/04/2010 09:10, Graeme Wilford wrote:
Anyone know where we are with this?
http://opengeodata.org/surrey-county-air-survey
Graeme,
Sorry -- I've been meaning to write this up on the wiki. Gravitystorm
has created a set of tiles for z19 using the imagery. The tiles are
available at:
7 matches
Mail list logo
