Personally I do not think the signs should be put in OSM, just the actual
POI's are tagged.
There may be reasons to put in signs, I just do not think this is one of
them.
Dale
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag the first node of the offramp as
I just tried with 2439 and can't seem to reproduce this.
-- Dave
The issue I was having is gone with 2439svn.
I see a lingering problem in 2439 - apparently overlapping downloads +
edits cause a large mass of downloads to be marked as changed for upload.
Ian Dees wrote:
* Ok, not impossible, but the import size would triple and the CPU
time to compute the new addressing-only ways might make it hard for
the regular mapper to do.
But for no added code and editor complexity.
If it's just an issue of CPU time, I would be happy to set up a box
Don Lambert wrote:
The problem seems to be with the color relief tiles between 106.6 long
and 107.3 long at the approx 1:34,285 and 1:17,142 scale levels.
Indeed. I've started rendering the missing tiles, so they should be up
within a few days.
- Lars
--
Lars Ahlzen
l...@ahlzen.com
On 12 Nov 2009, at 8:28 , Ian Dees wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12 Nov 2009, at 6:14 , Andy Allan wrote:
I disagree there. It's much better to put the effort in during the
initial import, than to import things badly and try
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 10:28 -0600, Ian Dees wrote:
Give everyone a chance to work in a constructive way and don't expect
others to clean the mess bad import left behind.
No wonder there are only few motivated mappers in US. In Canada they
do a much
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 Nov 2009, at 6:14 , Andy Allan wrote:
I disagree there. It's much better to put the effort in during the
initial import, than to import things badly and try to fix it up
later. We've been working on lots
On 12 Nov 2009, at 6:14 , Andy Allan wrote:
I disagree there. It's much better to put the effort in during the
initial import, than to import things badly and try to fix it up
later. We've been working on lots of post-import fixups in the last 6
months and it's much harder than everyone
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Apollinaris Schoell
ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
It probably has to be a relation. Include a start node, an end node,
and a list of one or more ways (which are connected to form one
logical way).
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On the other hand, putting the information directly on the way would
be
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a fairly well established convention that in OSM it's the
houses/plots, not the road centrelines, that are addressed.
But that doesn't always reflect reality. The reality, at least in
many parts of the world, is
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:29 , Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a fairly well established convention that in OSM it's the
houses/plots, not the road centrelines, that are addressed.
But that doesn't always reflect reality. The
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 11:40 -0800, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:29 , Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's a fairly well established convention that in OSM it's the
houses/plots, not the road centrelines, that
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't know any place except in US where this has been done.
Even if it weren't done anywhere else (which it is, see below), there
are a lot of houses in the US.
how is that easier than the Karlsruhe scheme?
It's
Dale Puch wrote:
Personally I do not think the signs should be put in OSM, just the actual
POI's are tagged.
There may be reasons to put in signs, I just do not think this is one of
them.
Dale
--
Dale Puch
Don't forget the intent of the requester's original question, i.e., how to
tag an
follow the OSM principle.
map what's on the ground no matter where you are
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:56 , Dave Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 11:40 -0800, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
On 12 Nov 2009, at 11:29 , Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
Chris Hunter wrote:
Tag the first node of the offramp as highway=motorway_junction. As far as
the sign itself goes, there's a proposed relationship for signs in the UK
and EU at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign that
may be of some help.
Note that destination
Dale Puch wrote:
Personally I do not think the signs should be put in OSM, just the actual
POI's are tagged.
Agreed. Another factor is that the US MUTCD only defines a very small
number of specific services nationwide (food, lodging, camping,
telephone, gasoline, diesel), while other states
If we're going to go into detail, no type of interpolation reflects
reality, it's just interpolation.
I disagree. An approximation of reality reflects reality.
Physical street surveys will almost never get 100% reality due to missing
house numbers, etc. Are you proposing to discourage
FYI - I applied the experimental script which creates address interpolation
ways at -
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
The results are at
Hi,
I have a random question... does anyone have suggestions for how I would
correctly tag a Super Wal-Mart? I read through the wiki but there didn't appear
to be a tag that fit.
The store in question has a 1.) a full grocery store with
bakery/deli/produce/dry goods, 2.) a full service hair
How should one tag a no-right-turn-on-red-light restriction? Like other
turn restrictions, with restriction=no_right_turn_on_red?
--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:43 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Every single country has different addressing rules, it's not like
this particular scheme is special. That's why someone came up with a
tagging scheme that can express all or most of these rules
They did? What
Thea Clay wrote:
Hi,
I have a random question... does anyone have suggestions for how I would
correctly tag a Super Wal-Mart? I read through the wiki but there didn't
appear to be a tag that fit.
The store in question has a 1.) a full grocery store with
bakery/deli/produce/dry goods,
Randy wrote:
Dale Puch wrote:
Personally I do not think the signs should be put in OSM, just the actual
POI's are tagged.
There may be reasons to put in signs, I just do not think this is one of
them.
Dale
--
Dale Puch
Don't forget the intent of the requester's original question, i.e.,
Alan Mintz wrote:
How should one tag a no-right-turn-on-red-light restriction? Like other
turn restrictions, with restriction=no_right_turn_on_red?
I think this is going too far into depth for any real navigation
purpose, I'd say skip it as the restriction lasts for only seconds at a
time,
We kinda have this problem all over the place: anywhere you have
multiple places of business where you enter into the building at the
same location for all of them. This could be a mall, or a Wal-Mart,
or a two-story building with a store on each level.
We currently have no markup for accurately
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian hasn't (yet) mentioned whether this data he deals with contains
potential address ranges or actual ranges, so I assumed actual.
The fact that it's tagged on the line segments representing the road
centerline pretty
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
There are cases with Karlruhe Scheme that need addditional tags like
Czech addresses but I haven't heard of such cases from US or other
mappers.
I recently started using a new modifier tag addr:inclusion to help in
accurately
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:43 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Every single country has different addressing rules, it's not like
this particular scheme is special. That's why someone came up with a
tagging scheme that can express all or most of these rules
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Thea Clay t...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a random question... does anyone have suggestions for how I would
correctly tag a Super Wal-Mart? I read through the wiki but there didn’t
appear to be a tag that fit.
The store in question has a 1.) a full
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I would also strongly encourage you to use one such line on each side of the
road, instead of putting tags on the road itself. This makes it very clear
which side an address is on, better than any tags you can put on the
I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a timming restriction,
not a navigation one. The only time you need that information is when your
at that red light. Your not checking the map or routing software to decide
if you should turn or not, your checking the intersection for traffic,
Kate's suggestion echoed my thought as well. Many of those are actually
seprate businesses/services and should be tagged separately anyhow.
Dale
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Kate maps2w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Thea Clay t...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Hi,
I have
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I would also strongly encourage you to use one such line on each side of the
road, instead of putting tags on the road itself. This makes it very clear
which side an address is on, better than any
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a timming restriction,
not a navigation one.
Navigation is not the only purpose of OSM data :).
I see no piratical use for the information on the map.
If you could build
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I consider interpolation ways to be an abstract thing also. To convey the
information, they need to be on each side of the road
The thing is, they don't.
As long as there is no doubt (for the
person viewing the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a timming restriction,
not a navigation one.
Navigation is not the only purpose of OSM data :).
I think
Hello All,
Did someone delete the talk-us-bayarea list? From the last email discussion
on talk-us there was never a full or agreed upon decision. I just tried to
announce an upcoming event and got the following error message. I understand
it's not an active mailing list, but it is used for
I'm very sorry for the long delay. I've moved the meeting minutes to
Google Docs:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AdR8Q-fn7LjLZGNzY2h3cXpfOWNqY2s0Y2M3hl=en
If you'd like to edit them, or edit the next meeting minutes (or
agenda, which is forthcoming), please send me your Google username so
I
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
I'm very sorry for the long delay. I've moved the meeting minutes to
Google Docs:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AdR8Q-fn7LjLZGNzY2h3cXpfOWNqY2s0Y2M3hl=en
Hello,
Is there a reason to put this @ Google instead of on the wiki?
Thanks,
N.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Nakor nakor...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason to put this @ Google instead of on the wiki?
Several people wanted it on Google Docs so it could be edited by
multiple members in real time.
- Serge
___
Talk-us
That's what database normalization addresses. BTW, this is the first time
I've heard of the semicolon approach.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. The tags must be unique on the name
side. That's why you see name, name_1,
43 matches
Mail list logo
