The semi colon approach has been a method in use for many years now, but it's
generally avoided. Unfortunately we don't have database normalisation with our
tagging system. The Keys must be unique. Previous version of the API allowed
keys that were not unique, however nothing used it as the
So it the general consensus to use name = first name, name_1 =
second_name, name_2 = third name instead of name=first name;second name;
third name? I've be adding names to motorway_junctions and I've see the
semicolon format, so I started do the same myself.
Richard
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Richard Shank wrote:
So it the general consensus to use name = first name, name_1 =
second_name, name_2 = third name instead of name=first name;second
name; third name? I've be adding names to motorway_junctions and I've
see the semicolon format, so I started do the same myself.
The
At 2009-11-13 01:58, Stellan Lagerstrom wrote:
Richard Shank wrote:
So it the general consensus to use name = first name, name_1 =
second_name, name_2 = third name instead of name=first name;second
name; third name? I've be adding names to motorway_junctions and I've
see the semicolon
Going back to the original question, each shop should be it's own node or area,
thus the problem of multiple names isn't an issue any more. You place the nodes
of the shops roughly where they are within the shopping centre.
If you do have something that has multiple names, you are better
If you do have something that has multiple names, you are better stating what
the name is. For example if a bridge has a name, you could use name= for the
street name that runs on top of the bridge, and name:bridge for the name of
the bridge itself. I'm sure there are better examples.
I didn't
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm very sorry for the long delay. I've moved the meeting minutes to
Google Docs:
My apologies. This is the published version.
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcschwqz_9cjck4cc7
I'm still getting used to Google Docs.
-
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
Going back to the original question, each shop should be it's own node or
area, thus the problem of multiple names isn't an issue any more. You place
the nodes of the shops roughly where they are within the
I've tried to clean up our chapter pages a bit. Information was spread
across multiple pages. That's no longer the case. Everything is value
is at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States
That means the meeting information for the next meeting, as well as
the
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Kate maps2w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
Going back to the original question, each shop should be it's own node or
area, thus the problem of multiple names isn't an issue any more. You
On 13 Nov 2009, at 14:23, Ian Dees wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Kate maps2w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Shaun McDonald
sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk wrote:
Going back to the original question, each shop should be it's own node or
area, thus the problem of
For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the
stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually there.
If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the super
walmart as well? Or the bank ect. As for the walmart services
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:19 -0500, Mike N. wrote:
FYI - I applied the experimental script which creates address
interpolation ways at -
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
The results are at
Paul Johnson wrote:
Randy wrote:
Dale Puch wrote:
Personally I do not think the signs should be put in OSM, just the actual
POI's are tagged.
There may be reasons to put in signs, I just do not think this is one of
them.
Dale
--
Dale Puch
Don't forget the intent of the requester's original
Alex S. wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
return-to-where-you-came-from [sign] (at
state lines to send you back out of Oregon), etc).
U-Turn Route - there are quite a few signed u-turn routes in
Washington state, too. I have questioned (myself) whether these should
be explicitly defined in OSM. On
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
Cool stuff! I've been looking at doing the same thing. Which osgeo
python code are you using?
I'm using the default lib for Fedora - GDAL 1.6.0; release 8.fc11 .
Someone else (in Georgia?) created all
Dale Puch wrote:
For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the
stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually
there.
If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the super
walmart as well? Or the bank ect. As for the walmart
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Owlman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a timming
Owlman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a timming restriction,
not a navigation one.
Navigation is not the only purpose of OSM
Alan Mintz wrote:
California being one of those more permissive states, I agree with the
annoyance at those who don't know it's legal to turn right on red (or the
other cases) unless specifically prohibited.
Because it is rare to see this prohibition, I believe it is important to
tag and
Alex S. wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
return-to-where-you-came-from [sign] (at
state lines to send you back out of Oregon), etc).
U-Turn Route - there are quite a few signed u-turn routes in
Washington state, too. I have questioned (myself) whether these should
be explicitly defined in
So, just like the original TIGER import, I'm now grossly stealing
someone else's code:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
and I now have made some .osm files with Karlruhe Scheme addressing
ways. I'm not going to post them publicly. I did
Can I have SF county, CA please and Arapahoe County, CO...?
Yours c.
Steve
On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
So, just like the original TIGER import, I'm now grossly stealing
someone else's code:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 17:14 -0700, SteveC wrote:
Can I have SF county, CA please and Arapahoe County, CO...?
http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/secret/stevec-345/
-- Dave
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
We'll work on making sure that these data look good and I think some
people have some plans on how to get these integrated a bit at a time.
Thanks to those who worked on the namefinder - it worked GREAT
Hi Dave,
can you provide SC (Santa Clara County) California?
btw any ideas how the break it into smaller pieces? I definitely don't
want to upload a whole county at once and deal with the big mess
afterwards.
As I understand it address ways don't connect to other ways so it
shouldn't be
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/import/tiger2osm/shape_to_osm-Tiger.py
We'll work on making sure that these data look good and I think some
people have some plans on how to get these integrated a bit at a time.
Paul Johnson wrote:
(such as only one other state allowing left
turn on red from a two way street, contra to the national default).
And that would be?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Nakor wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
(such as only one other state allowing left
turn on red from a two way street, contra to the national default).
And that would be?
Sorry I realized after posting that can sound aggressive. I am just
being curious that's all.
Thanks,
N.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Nakor nakor...@gmail.com wrote:
Nakor wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
(such as only one other state allowing left
turn on red from a two way street, contra to the national default).
And that would be?
Sorry I realized after posting that can sound aggressive. I
Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Nakor nakor...@gmail.com wrote:
Nakor wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
(such as only one other state allowing left
turn on red from a two way street, contra to the national default).
And that would be?
Sorry I
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
We'll work on making sure that these data look good and I think some
people have some plans on how to get these integrated a bit at a time.
And hopefully in some
Anthony writes:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
We'll work on making sure that these data look good and I think some
people have some plans on how to get these integrated a bit at a time.
Nakor wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Five other states, namely Alaska, Idaho, Michigan, Oregon and
Washington, allow left turns on red even from a two-way street.
Thanks. I had always wondered if this is allowed here in MI as only a
few people do it at the one intersection like that I know near
On 11/13/09 10:43 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
O
TIGER is an incredibly huge data set. It comes from what may be the
most diverse set of primary sources of anything in the world short of
OSM itself.
It shouldn't be trusted explicitly (no single map should). Do you have
some more constructive
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Seth Fitzsimmons s...@mojodna.net wrote:
That looks likely. Quabbin Reservoir (Western MA) is also rendering
similarly:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.3749lon=-72.2847zoom=12layers=0B00FTF
Last I checked, landuse=reservoir is being rendered like
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Dale Puch wrote:
For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the
stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually
there.
If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the super
walmart as
Alex S. wrote:
Nakor wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Five other states, namely Alaska, Idaho, Michigan, Oregon and
Washington, allow left turns on red even from a two-way street.
Thanks. I had always wondered if this is allowed here in MI as only a
few people do it at the one intersection like
Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Owlman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have to side with not tagging them. This is a
Dave
I've looked at the two you sent me and they're both basically fine but for two
things.
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just search
for all the ways that make up the addressing on
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:11 PM, SteveC wrote:
Dave
I've looked at the two you sent me and they're both basically fine but for
two things.
In Denver the houses are all set back a lot further, so some way to say 'on
north-south roads, set back X feet' might help a lot. Or, in JOSM just
it got killed after consensus from people
On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Sarah Manley wrote:
Hello All,
Did someone delete the talk-us-bayarea list? From the last email discussion
on talk-us there was never a full or agreed upon decision. I just tried to
announce an upcoming event and got
Hi,
If the only reason to have a local talk-list is to host mapping
parties, then meetup.com is better designed for that (it will find
newbie mappers easier). ( itoworld, you can find everyone around)
Otherwise, keeping the discussion 'more open' is best. imo.
Ie. If your talking about importing
TIGER is an incredibly huge data set. It comes from what may be the
most diverse set of primary sources of anything in the world short of
OSM itself.
It shouldn't be trusted explicitly (no single map should). Do you
have
some more constructive information about places where you've
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I think the
inaccuracies will be far easier to fix than to put the addressing in
from scratch. I've done a lot of mapping in my area, but haven't
been willing to start doing addresses, even before I knew that the
TIGER import was
Matthias Julius wrote:
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Dale Puch wrote:
For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the
stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually
there.
If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm highly in favor of doing the import, regardless. I think the
inaccuracies will be far easier to fix than to put the addressing in from
scratch. I've done a lot of mapping in my area, but haven't been willing to
47 matches
Mail list logo
