Re: [Talk-it] Il nuovo portale cartografico nazionale è online #opendatafail

2017-03-29 19:40 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > I metadati della pagina "Numeri Civici - Aggiornamento 2012" [1] Questo dataset c'era anche nel precedente portale e con licenza cc-by-sa. > [...] > > Non vedo la clausola "NC". Forse non è il dataset completo? non hanno

Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon source tags preferred method

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:06 AM, nwastra wrote: > Putting the sources on the objects has been deprecated for a while. The > source should be put on the changeset only. If you are doing edits that > involve several different sources, it is best to split the changes up > into

[Talk-at] Verwendung von Multipolygonen

Bei der (wieder einmal) intensiven Beschäftigung mit Multipolygonen sind mir - abseits der Geometrie - einige fragwürdige Verwendungen aufgefallen. Dazu ein paar hoffentlich hilfreiche Fragen und Beispiele (aus Österreich). Grundsätzlich: eine Multipolygon-Relation [1] (MPR) statt eines

Re: [Talk-it] Il nuovo portale cartografico nazionale è online #opendatafail

2017-03-30 16:50 GMT+02:00 Cascafico Giovanni : > in ogni caso la cosa più utile, i numeri civici, appaiono come: > > - Servizi - Numeri civici - Aggiornamento 2012 > - Dataset - Numeri civici - Aggiornamento 2012 > > ma entrambi i link non fanno che fornire lo stesso

Re: [Talk-it] Il nuovo portale cartografico nazionale è online #opendatafail

in ogni caso la cosa più utile, i numeri civici, appaiono come: - Servizi - Numeri civici - Aggiornamento 2012 - Dataset - Numeri civici - Aggiornamento 2012 ma entrambi i link non fanno che fornire lo stesso indirizzo del WMS. ho provato a caricarlo come sfonfo in JOSM, ma francamente avere un

Re: [OSM-talk] it may be useful

On 30/03/17 18:38, Lester Caine wrote: > Kind regards, Lester Caine *I* did not sent that email! Which is why it has another email address since forging my own would fall fowl of my spf record! -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact

[Talk-it] [administrivia][osmveneto] Creazione nuova lista regionale del Veneto

Ciao a tutti, fino a poco meno di un mesetto fa la ML osmveneto utilizzata come lista regionale per il Veneto era ospitata sul mio server personale. Un brutto tiro dell'hoster, una mia disattenzione e una serie di sfighe conseguenti ha fatto si che perdessi buona parte di quello che avevo su quel

Re: [Talk-it] [administrivia][osmveneto] Creazione nuova lista regionale del Veneto

Il giorno gio, 30/03/2017 alle 20.48 +0200, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto ha scritto: > Ciao a tutti, > > fino a poco meno di un mesetto fa la ML osmveneto utilizzata come > lista regionale per il Veneto era ospitata sul mio server personale. > Un brutto tiro dell'hoster, una mia disattenzione e una

Re: [Talk-it] [civici Torino] Offset generale

Il 29/03/2017 18:36, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: Cari amici, ho paura che questo è solo l'ennesima manifestazione dello stesso errore sistematico con tutti gli import fatti finora in Veneto.(edifici e landuse). Beh sarebbe anche normale,... se il dato di partenza è in Roma 40 va da se che

Re: [Talk-it] [civici Torino] Offset generale

... e suppongo per questo motivo è stato scritto nello istruzioni per import che ogni pezzo deve essere allineato a PCN2006 primo dell'import definitivo. On 30 Mar 2017 19:20, "Paolo Monegato" wrote: > Il 29/03/2017 18:36, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: > >> Cari amici, >>

Re: [Talk-it] [civici Torino] Offset generale

Il comune di Torino ha pubblicato direttamente in coordinate geodetiche, suppongo WGS84. Il giorno 30 marzo 2017 19:19, Paolo Monegato ha scritto: > Il 29/03/2017 18:36, Volker Schmidt ha scritto: > >> Cari amici, >> >> ho paura che questo è solo l'ennesima

Re: [OSM-talk] it may be useful

On 30/03/17 19:47, Lester Caine wrote: > On 30/03/17 18:38, Lester Caine wrote: >> Kind regards, Lester Caine > > *I* did not sent that email! Which is why it has another email address > since forging my own would fall fowl of my spf record! OK anybody know who to report 'The Brit Method'

Re: [Talk-at] Verwendung von Multipolygonen

On 2017-03-30 15:43, jdz5...@gmx.at wrote: Bei der (wieder einmal) intensiven Beschäftigung mit Multipolygonen sind mir - abseits der Geometrie - einige fragwürdige Verwendungen aufgefallen. Dazu ein paar hoffentlich hilfreiche Fragen und Beispiele (aus Österreich). Grundsätzlich: eine

[OSM-talk] Fwd: [HOT] Call for Logos for State of the Map Asia 2017

FYI, State of the Map Asia 2017 will happen in Kathmandu Sept-Oct 2017 (dates TBD). Please help us design the logo. -- Forwarded message -- From: kshitiz khanal Date: Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:23 AM Subject: [HOT] Call for Logos for State of the Map Asia 2017

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

Per me è ok. Aggiorniamo pure la pagina wiki. Ciao, Paolo Il 30/mar/2017 19:12, "girarsi_liste" ha scritto: > Il 29/03/2017 22:38, Alberto ha scritto: > >> Oggi ho messo mano al disegnino, metto in allegato, e come sempre per > >> chi vuole mando il sorgente SVG per

Re: [Talk-it] Attacco di mandata per autopompa

Il 29/03/2017 22:38, Alberto ha scritto: >> Oggi ho messo mano al disegnino, metto in allegato, e come sempre per >> chi vuole mando il sorgente SVG per modificarselo e licenza sempre CC-BY > > Si più o meno una cosa del genere. Ridimensionandolo a 20x20 la scritta però > non si capisce più (tra

[OSM-talk] Disputed border between Greece and Turkey near Imia/Kardak in the Aegean Sea (was: Re: [Geocoding] Boundries of Kardak Islands)

Dear İlhami Özer, These borders are disputed and the island is claimed by both Greece and Turkey. There was a recent incident near the island in January: "A Turkish navy missile boat accompanied with two special-forces speedboats entered the area around the islets on 29 January 2017. According

Re: [Talk-at] Vorsicht Falle in: fire_hydrant:flow_capacity

Hi Charly zu deiner Frage kann ich relativ wenig sagen (haben die Kollegen ja bereist erledigt) nur schau mal hierhin: https://wambachers-osm.website/emergency ist eine Alternative zur OpenFireMap. Gruss walter ps: Ja, das ist mein Baby. ___

Re: [Talk-at] Vorsicht Falle in: fire_hydrant:flow_capacity

Hallo Walter! Wenn ich etwas dazu sagen darf... Eigentlich hast ausgerechnet Du, ohne es zu wissen, diese aktuelle Feuerwehr-Diskussion durch Deine EmergencyMap ausgelöst und kannst stolz darauf sein :) - In der Wochennotiz 347 wurde davon berichtet und ich habe diese Information durch private

Re: [Talk-at] Vorsicht Falle in: fire_hydrant:flow_capacity

Hi Borut, Am 30.03.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Borut Maricic: In meinen Augen ist das absolute Vorteil Deiner Anwendung deren Aktualität. Falls es Dir möglich wäre, in ein paar Sätzen die Architektur hier zu beschreiben (ich bin halt neugierig, will aber lieber nicht in die Source eintauchen) - vor

Re: [OSM-talk] Disputed border between Greece and Turkey near Imia/Kardak in the Aegean Sea (was: Re: [Geocoding] Boundries of Kardak Islands)

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:39 AM, David Marchal wrote: > If I correctly remember, in such cases, both point of views should be used; > in this case, two boundary segments should be dragged: one including the > islets with Greece, and the other one including them with Turkey. The

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [OSM-talk] Disputed border between Greece and Turkey near Imia/Kardak in the Aegean Sea (was: Re: [Geocoding] Boundries of Kardak Islands)

If I correctly remember, in such cases, both point of views should be used; in this case, two boundary segments should be dragged: one including the islets with Greece, and the other one including them with Turkey. It has already been the case: for instance, the matter of the France-Italia

Re: [Talk-de] Drei Tage mit dem Plug-In Hybrid

bzw. noch besser: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4214500413 ist laut http://www.lemnet.org/map/ auf der anderen Straßeseite von "An der Quelle"... ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[Talk-de] Mechanisches Umtaggen, Vorschlag zur vereinheitlichung von 30er Zonen tagging

Es gibt mehrere Standards und ein paar weitere Alternativen, um 30er Zonen zu taggen. Dazu hier im wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed Aktuelle Zahlen von heute: maxspeed=30 and zone:maxspeed=DE:30 - 32952 uses maxspeed=30 and source:maxspeed=DE:zone30 - 32018 uses

Re: [Talk-de] Drei Tage mit dem Plug-In Hybrid

Am 30.03.2017 um 09:17 schrieb Uwe Sennewald: > Habt ihr schon mal was von LEMnet ( http://www.lemnet.org/de ) gehört ? > Die nutzen OSM , müllen es aber mit den Informationen zu den > Ladestationen nicht voll. Hmm, und in wie weit nutzen die OSM? Also die ersten Stickpunkte die ich so gemacht

[Talk-se] OSM som underlag för att producera CC0/CC BY-material i rasterform?

Hej, har följt listan ett tag och nu har vi en aktuell fråga. Jag jobbar på en statlig myndighet, Havs- och vattenmyndigheten, och OSM är en intressant datamängd för oss. Bland annat efter påtryckning från OSM mfl att bli tydligare i villkor på våra myndighetsdata så har vi anammat den tidigare

Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků a fotografií nefunguje

Ahoj, driv to tak bylo ale v praxi mi prislo vhodnejsi vedet, jake fotky v okoli jsou i kdyz to nejsou ty spravne. Jednak pro prehled a i kvuli tomu, ze tagovani muze byt chybne, dost casto takto nejake tagy u fotek opravuju. Pripadne je tam situace kde na miste rozcestniku existuje fotka konce

Re: [Talk-de] Mechanisches Umtaggen, Vorschlag zur vereinheitlichung von 30er Zonen tagging

Ja, nach meinem Blog "maxspeed .. eine Perle des Wikis" [1], bin ich ganz klar sofort dafür, da mal ein bisschen aufzuräumen :) Trotzdem sollte denke ich mal weiterhin die Möglichkeit geprüft werden, in diversen QA-Tools die Prüfung source:maxspeed=: ungleich maxspeed= unterzubringen. [1]

Re: [talk-ph] Missing Road

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Jim Morgan wrote: > Also, you used to be able to right click on the map to load the image. > Seems like OSM has hijacked the right click menu. > This was announced here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mcld/diary/40503 And debated

Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků a fotografií nefunguje

Zrusil jsem v OSM i fotce 'a' na konci ref, posun a dalsi jsi asi udelal ty, kazdopadne vyreseno. Mej se. Dne 29. března 2017 20:48 Tom Ka napsal(a): > ahoj, zitra na to mrknu bliz, ale do ref to pismenko nepatri. ozvu se ti. > > bye > > On Mar 29, 2017 18:27, "Zdeněk

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] landuse=farm bientôt retiré du rendu standard

> JOSM est votre ami : j'ai regardé par chez moi et je suppose qu'ailleurs > c'est pareil : il n'y avait pas de découpe entre la partie corps de ferme et > la partie champ (logique : on ne distinguait pas les deux). Donc il va > falloir découper. Les tags étaient là mais ils étaient mal compris,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] landuse=farm bientôt retiré du rendu standard

2017-03-30 1:24 GMT+02:00 Jérôme Amagat : > les landuse=farm de plus de 2m² donc 2 hectares aussi grand c'est que ça > a été créer pour représenter des champs et pas un corps de ferme. > il peut il y avoir des bâtiments au milieu mais c'est en majorité des champs >

Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků a fotografií nefunguje

díky za opravu - ale mám ještě dotaz - proč jsou na stránce http://osm.fit.vutbr.cz/OsmHiCheck/gp/?cor uvedeny fotky s tagy nečitelné, cyklo, mapa atd Tyto by snad měly být ignorovány Pražák Dne 30. března 2017 9:57 Tom Ka napsal(a): > Zrusil jsem v OSM i fotce 'a' na

[OSM-talk-fr] Relation type=route étrange

Bonjour, J'ai remarqué des relations d'itinéraire cyclable qui me paraissent inadapté aux modèles acceptés ; exemples : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6605742 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6486383 On dirait que l'objectif est plus d'avoir un rendu des pistes cyclables

Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:12:36AM +0100, Adam Snape wrote: > As bicycles are vehicles (and not all other vehicles are motorised) that > can be tagged as vehicle=no hgv=yes. Given that the exclusion likely > includes more than just vehicles (eg. horses) , access=no foot=yes hgv=yes > is maybe a

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Arrêts de bus sans nom dans MAPS.ME

J'utilise aussi Maps.me depuis quelques années. Simple et suffisante pour mes besoins. Manque juste quelques trucs comme la possibilité de prendre une photo pour illustrer un POI. Les modifications apportées aux POIs importés via le KML sont envoyées sur les serveurs de Maps.me : il n'est donc

Re: [Talk-se] OSM som underlag för att producera CC0/CC BY-material i rasterform?

On 2017-03-30 15:36, Bernt Rane wrote: [...] Frågan: om man skapar a) kartbilder eller b) karttjänster (i form av rastertjänster av typen WMS eller slippy map/xyz-maps) och det ingår OSM som del i underlagen är det enligt villkoren att släppa dessa kartbilder resp rasterkarttjänster för

Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků a fotografií nefunguje

no může být, přesto bych ale byl pro ignoraci fotek s tagem nečitelné -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Tom Ka Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 30. 3. 2017 13:44:15 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků a

Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:00:15AM +0100, David Woolley wrote: > On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote: > > and, for good measure, hgv=permissive. > > Permissive sounds wrong to me. Permissive basically reflects the rights of > the land owner, and for users is the same as yes. Well, yes, but looking

[OSM-talk-fr] Nomino en panne ?

Bonjour, Quand je cherche un toponyme avec Nomino : https://nomino.openstreetmap.fr/ et que je clique sur un élément de ce qui est retourné, j’obtiens "invalid object ». Une solution en vue ? Christian R.___

Re: [Talk-se] OSM som underlag för att producera CC0/CC BY-material i rasterform?

> On 30 Mar 2017, at 15:36, Bernt Rane wrote: Hej Bernt, > ODbL är ju till sin natur lite mer restriktiv då den kräver samma licensform > för bearbetningar av data om vi förstått rätt. Dvs mer lik CC BY-SA. Det stämmer, ODbL är mycket lik CC-BY-SA. > Åtminstone

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Bonjour Martijn Le problème de navigation que tu mentionnes ne s'explique pas par les données OSM. Vous tentatives de régler ces problèmes des logiciels de navigation alourdissent inutilement la base OSM. Les cles turn peuvent souvent etre utilisées et sont moins complexes que les relations de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nomino en panne ?

http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org Je ne connaissais pas Nomino, mais Nominatim fait à peu près la même chose, non ? Le 30/03/2017 à 17:31, Christian Rogel - christian.ro...@club-internet.fr a écrit : Bonjour, Quand je cherche un toponyme avec Nomino : https://nomino.openstreetmap.fr/ et

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Relation type=route étrange

Déjà le nom avec des "underscores" au lieu des espaces, comme si le but était de ne pas confondre avec le nom de la commune alors que c'est bel et bien une indication des pistes cyclables présentes sur la commune, mais pas un réseau en tant que tel (la commune n'a pas en charge elle-même toutes

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Relation type=route étrange

Bonsoir, 1 - Pour la Roche/Yon - La Rochelle -J'ai jeté un oeil et il s'agit effectivement d'une "collection" des infrastructures vélo du coin. Rien à voir avec la moindre notion d'itinéraire, encore moins de vélo route. Typiquement un mapping erroné pour faire ressortir les infrastructures en

Re: [Talk-de] Drei Tage mit dem Plug-In Hybrid

Am 30. März 2017 um 14:14 schrieb Harald Hartmann : > Am 30.03.2017 um 09:17 schrieb Uwe Sennewald: >> Habt ihr schon mal was von LEMnet ( http://www.lemnet.org/de ) gehört ? >> Die nutzen OSM , müllen es aber mit den Informationen zu den >> Ladestationen nicht voll.

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Hi Andrew (and let me reply to Pierre's comments too, sorry Pierre, I am a little slow parsing French). First off thanks for your additional comments, they are really useful. I realize that I should have shared more detail about what we are planning to do and will do a better job in the future

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] landuse=farm bientôt retiré du rendu standard

Attention, ne pas oublier que le RGP c'est du déclaratif. A combiner avec de l'orthophoto et/ou les bases d'occupation du sol des collectivités (SIGLR, CIGAL et compagnie) quand la licence permet. Denis -Message d'origine- De : Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr] Envoyé :

Re: [Talk-us] Building Footprints in CA

Brian M Hamlin maplabs at light42.com writes: I have been working with 2D building footprints from LA and other counties here in Berkeley on a research project, using a PostGIS/GDAL stack and a libosimum tool, among others.. The project is broadly named "California OpenData ECN" .. I am

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] landuse=farm bientôt retiré du rendu standard

On peut aussi profiter de l'arrivée du RPG (Registre Parcellaire Graphique) dispo en version 2013 (mais la 2014 arrive en principe d'ici quelques jours, la 2015 devrait être dispo en mai et en juillet on aurait la 2016) pour avoir des géométrie plus précises que CLC et faire d'une pierre deux

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] landuse=farm bientôt retiré du rendu standard

Effectivement, je n'avais pas pensé qu'il y a avait des relations farm. Même si le RGP est du déclaratif, c'est mieux que du CLC de 2006 (la Bretagne est particulièrement concernée par les terres agricoles mangées par les lotissements et autres zones industrielles). Alors un peu de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nomino en panne ?

Le 2017 Meur. 30 à 21:06, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > > http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org > Je ne connaissais pas Nomino, mais Nominatim fait à peu près la même chose, > non ? > > Le 30/03/2017 à 17:31, Christian Rogel -

Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků

no jo omlouvám se že mne to nenapadlo Pražák -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Tom Ka Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 29. 3. 2017 20:40:57 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] kontrola spárovanosti rozcestníků " Ahoj, to tam je

Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

As bicycles are vehicles (and not all other vehicles are motorised) that can be tagged as vehicle=no hgv=yes. Given that the exclusion likely includes more than just vehicles (eg. horses) , access=no foot=yes hgv=yes is maybe a better option. Adam On 30 Mar 2017 7:29 a.m., "Warin"

Re: [Talk-de] Drei Tage mit dem Plug-In Hybrid

Habt ihr schon mal was von LEMnet ( http://www.lemnet.org/de ) gehört ? Die nutzen OSM , müllen es aber mit den Informationen zu den Ladestationen nicht voll. Senni Am 28.03.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Max: > Herzlichen Dank für die übersichtliche Zusammenstellung zum Thema. Hat > mich bislang als

[talk-ph] Missing Road

This is odd. The end of Polaris street and the whole of Orion street are missing. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=14.56256=121.03101#map=19/14.56256/121.03101 I deleted and recreated Orion street, but that still didn't prompt it to re-appear. Any ideas? Also, you used to be able

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Martijn, Can I ask what is possibly a really dumb question? As stated earlier I'm not a lawyer, and really in truth I'm no cartographer either. I generally stick to adding POIs for stores in local stripmalls, because that's not too dangerous to the map. ;-) Not being an expert in mapping, I

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Hey Ian, The main purpose is to stop silly or dangerous things from happening. If a user misses their turn and the engine reroutes them to turn right where they shouldn't (or U-turn) the consequences could be catastrophic. When people are following a computer's instructions they'll follow them

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Kevin, That does make sense, but in the example Martijn gave, the starting point is well before the turning lane, so I'm picturing the car being there and the software still having time to make a choice which road to send it down. Why did OSRM pick to ignore the turning road given there is all

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Well, if distances are similar but peed limits are different, the router may prefer to go with the similar length route because it has a higher speed limit. Another case could be if the algorithm prefers the more major road classification over the lower classified road in the hierarchy, it could

Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

On 30-Mar-17 05:00 PM, David Woolley wrote: On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote: and, for good measure, hgv=permissive. Permissive sounds wrong to me. Permissive basically reflects the rights of the land owner, and for users is the same as yes. ___

Re: [Talk-GB] Layby restricted to abnormal loads

On 29/03/17 21:32, ael wrote: and, for good measure, hgv=permissive. Permissive sounds wrong to me. Permissive basically reflects the rights of the land owner, and for users is the same as yes. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-TW] Fwd: Last chance! Submit a talk proposal for SotM 2017!

給有興趣參加的人! 4月2日是裁稿日喔! Dongpo -- Forwarded message - From: State of the Map Team Date: Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:34 AM Subject: Last chance! Submit a talk proposal for SotM 2017! To:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] landuse=farm bientôt retiré du rendu standard

Le 30 mars 2017 à 22:40, a écrit : > Effectivement, je n'avais pas pensé qu'il y a avait des relations farm. > > Même si le RGP est du déclaratif, c'est mieux que du CLC de 2006 (la > Bretagne est particulièrement concernée par les terres agricoles mangées > par

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-us] Need Your Help!

Hi Moira, For understanding OSM and the editors, there is a ton of information available online. The Missing Maps website links to some tutorial videos: http://www.missingmaps.org/contribute/#learn And LearnOSM has details for everyone from beginners to advanced: http://learnosm.org/en/ The

[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

semanárioOSM Nº 349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 349, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado *em português*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/8905/ Aproveite! semanarioOSM? Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Onde?:

semanárioOSM Nº 349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 349, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado *em português*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/8905/ Aproveite! semanarioOSM? Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Onde?:

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #349 21/03/2017-27/03/2017

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 349, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8905/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages