Your free to contribute ideas or code that should be integrated.
It's implemented in C using gtk, glib, libcurl, libnpng libwebkit.
It would be nice to have a separate source tarball and binaries.
You said 'for linux', but I'd hope that this would run on any reasonable
mostly-posix system.
In my part of Australia, we have a speed limit that applies to every
non-rural street that is not specifically signed as being another
speed - basically case (b) below. The wording used in the law is
built up area. (In practice, the test for a built up area seems
to be does it have
I find this talk of overlapping polygons a bit boggling. Things seem
far simpler:
roads with an explicit speed tag use that tag. This represents the
situation where the road has a sign and that's been entered.
roads in a city center polygon that don't have a tag inherit from
the
Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk writes:
So as long as exception roads have speed tags, what's the
problem?
None as far as I can see, but by the time you've checked every road
in the zone to see whether it is an exception, and presumably tagged
it as checked so other mappers know it has been
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area
So is there any objection to
Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
(But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
I suppose it is, except that really it's highway=motorcycle.
My real point was that the whole 'highway'
My main concern is should I import data as is or optimize this data as
they are quite detailed? Also each region border is one separate
polygon. Should I merge neighbour region nodes and import seperate
border lines or again should I leave data as is?
While out riding just now I crossed
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/21 Milo van der Linden m...@opengeo.nl:
May I suggest looking at what people at the CORINE landcover dataset
have defined?
http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover/at_download/file
they have a nomenclature describing a
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Greg Troxelg...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
yes, land_use=forestry perhaps implies land_cover=trees,
Not when they've all just been chopped down :-)
land_use=forestry
land_cover = mud_treestumps_and_woodchips
But seriously, there's a difference between an
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Stephen Hopeslh...@gmail.com wrote:
No, you're wrong here. Maxheight is an element of the way that goes
under the bridge. It is caused by the bridge, but it is not part of
the bridge.
You're saying that the
If the highway-tag was the only tag on a road, I would agree with this
approach, but as we are meanwhile tagging physical attributes as
supplementory tags (e.g. lanes, surface, traffic-lights), as we do for
administrative classification (ref), I am in favour of changing the
definition
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
secondary is typically used for travel at least 25km (between
multiple towns)
tertiary is used to get to secondary roads (to get to the 'real
road' in the next town)
this is working well for out-of-town situations. Inside
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com writes:
--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it's a different meaning in urban areas as in rural areas.
Many of
what you tag as primary and secondary in rural areas
(especially low
density ones) has 2 (1+1) lanes, while
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
- residential roads (just in residential areas, no
connecting
function, you will not take this if you don't live in the
David Lynch djly...@gmail.com writes:
Motorway: More than one grade-separated intersection in a row, high
speed, oncoming traffic separated.
A Motorway should meet the physical standards of what the best national
Motorway/Interstate/etc. roads are. Generally entirely divided and
limited
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I just see it as a hierarchical line:
residential
unclassified
tert
sec
prim
trunk
motorway
it's simple as
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
So probably the renderers need a way to show unclassified as less
important than tertiary.
they (t...@h, mapnik, cyclemap) are already doing this.
Sorry, I meant 'lower than tertiary and more
Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com writes:
David's summary is imho a good one. There are subtle but not hard-and-fast
distinctions between 'sheltered accommodation' for those who can manage in
their own place but need a warden around (and perhaps a community room or a
public kitchen) and
Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:20 PM, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
sidewalks in villages - what to do?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.172898lon=-0.524788zoom=18
are they footpaths or are they road attributes?
Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com writes:
2009/8/11 Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de:
Hi!
Lauri Kytömaa schrieb:
_When not signed for anyone_ but where local legislation allows cyclists
on such routes, people used local judgement to decide whether the way
was built as being suitable for the common
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com writes:
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
Going the other way and not having highway=footway imply
any value for
bicycle would mean that people like me could tag something
as a
footway and say that I don't know whether it's
Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk writes:
here, whatever the local council decides to put up
often reflective silverish background, black letters
may be black on yellow
may be white on blue
may be green on white
Where's here?
The UK seems to be rather variable, black on white is most
shop=vacant; empty stores should be marked vacant, not removed from map.
I think this is fine. shop=foo disused=yes doesn't work because often
the idenity of a shop is removed as the landlord gets ready to re-lease,
and it's just an empty room.
shop=supplements; specialty food and dietary
sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org writes:
Hi there,
For those interested, please have a look at this proposition :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Military_base
It's intended use is to permit the same area to be for example a forest and a
military restricted
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Hydrography_Dataset
http://www.mail-archive.com/newb...@openstreetmap.org/msg03521.html
It sems 'obvious' :-) that this should be
waterway=stream
stream=intermittent
pgpvyQUE20BJu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Sorry if this is on the wiki - I've tried to read the relevant parts.
I live in a semi-rural area where there are a lot of long driveways.
Some of these show up on the map, mostly due to MassGIS bulk imports.
For commercial places, and other places where the public might go, I've
set a few to
For government/bulk imports -where we know that updates are available;
how is it dealt with?
I was just thinking about this; there is a lot of MassGIS data now, and
some of it is wrong (wrong location, streets that don't actually exist),
although 99.8% of it seems very good. I've edited
First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database,
unless you have made certain by your own eye that the object in
question is an error and not existing in reality! Even than take care
not to remove anything marked as abandoned or alike, that marks this
object was once
Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com writes:
On Jan 25, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
So I think this is really 3-way merge
process, and there needs to be something that looks at each item in
the
new dump, finds any previous import, and checks if it has been
modified.
Bulk imports
Example 'unicvs' log (where name is actually GPS seconds):
--
lat,long,alt,name
49.66167756437,-114.59122054052,1434.1903,584656.000
I share the discomfort of others about truly non-editable imported data.
I have found a number of errors in MassGIS data, although the vast
majority of it seems very good.
Two approaches come to mind:
1.
a. Have a way to have a separate database with such data.
b. Have a way to have
Someone added amenity=food_outlets to the map features and even after
reading the comment An area with several food outlets I'm quite unsure
what this could be.
Is this a collection of several amenity=fast_food or a kind of
vending_machine or ...?
In the US we have a thing called
As you can see there is a roundabout, but there is also a dual
carriageway through the middle with the flow controlled by traffic
lights. If you are in the lanes which go through as the dual
carriageway you can't turn onto the roundabout, and if you are in
the lanes that lead onto the
There has been some discussion about what might be a similar problem on
talk-us, where different states have different signs on Interstate
highways.
I have a few questions; it might be good to explain the answers on the
tag proposal page. (I'm sure in .es the answers are obvious but I think
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es writes:
In the US, the essence of the issue is that we have Interstate highways,
which have a standard sign, but some states, especially California, have
variants, and people want maps to show the local variants so they match
what's on the ground.
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es writes:
As an example, near me in the US you can be on a road which is both I-95
S and Massachusetts state route 128 south. Then there is an
intersection where I-95 splits off. After the interchange you are on
128S and I-93N.
Hm, sounds a little
What currently comes closest to what I want is an area with a
place= tag, but the meaning of that is not clearly defined,
and you can't do everything with that.
I think what you really want is an implicit relation, where the road
ways inherit maxspeed from the relation, and you define the
David Lynch djly...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:45, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Is it ok to use barrier=toll_booth for portals over the road with
cameras for automated toll collection, like the ones used for LKW
Maut (HGV toll) in Germany? To me, toll_booth
I just mapped a CVS, which is a store that sells lots of personal
hygiene stuff and has a real pharmacy (with a licensed pharmacist, who
can fill prescriptions signed by doctors). I used amenity=pharmacy
dispensing=yes, but find the description on the tag page confusing. I
put my confusion on
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 09.05.2009 um 08:59 schrieb Paul Johnson:
Yes, but here in the US you wouldn't call anything where you couldn't
get a prescription filled a pharmacy so the dispensing tag is
redundant. I think that's what he's getting at.
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation and call it
route=greenway and dont have it render on the cyclemap. Just map the
sections as appropriate.
Greenway is the US/Canadianism for cycleway.
I don't follow
In other words, stop the edit war, discuss pros and cons on the talk
page, and be open to include more rather than remove. If it is
concluded as not a religion than find alternative tagging.
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion
[2]
We were discussing what exactly a straight line was. There is no such
thing as a straight line in the database, because, as you correctly
state, the database only stores the end points of a line. If you draw a
line from point lat=10;lon=10 to lat=30;lon=30, then it is unclear
Frank Lahrmann frala1...@gmail.com writes:
Am 26.01.2010 15:43, schrieb Nakor:
Anybody knows where I can find a North America extract (at least US and
Canada)? I used to get it from geofabrik but I cannot find it there.
Have look here: http://downloads.cloudmade.com/north_america
That
I have been noticing this. My theory, not yet confirmed by actually
looking at the data, is that this is due to tags on polygons from the
massgis open space or similar import. I think there are parcels that
have tags like landuse=reservoir, and this means that those parcels are
used for
Has someone done a bot edit to fix the duplicate nodes in Massachusetts
resulting from the MassGIS import being segmented at town boundaries.
There are a lot of dups still, but they look like neighboring open space
polygons mostly.
pgpN6F1HDSmmJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I would like to put the lat long data right into the JPEG images though.
I don't know how to use gpsbabel or any other program to integrate the
lat lon in the EXIF part of the photos. I can use the commandline if it
is required or if there are a few simple commands.
Maybe a command
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 February 2010 06:10, Jochen Plumeyer joc...@plumeyer.org wrote:
Be aware of your time zone (and daylight savings timezone as well) of your
camera, as GPX times are all in lon=0°/ Greenwich/ UTC/ Zulu time.
Actually they are in GPS time, and
Yesterday I ordered my first camera(Nikon Coolpix L19). Mostly with the
purpose of taking photos while I have a gps along with me, to later
geotag photos with josm and later use the pictures as sources for street
names or Points of Interest.
Does anyone have that camera? I was a bit
Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.edu writes:
I have a related question, which I've let sit for several months
hoping to find an answer for. There is a park here
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=27.8394lon=-82.5924zoom=14layers=B000FTF
that includes wetland islands, wetland mainland, and
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Stefano Pallicca palli...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ice_cream
Use amenity=* for useful and important facilities.
Use shop=* for a place selling a retail product or
So would be the best solution to fix this issue ? I see different options:
- do nothing (with the risk that a bot will fix it incorrectly in the
future)
- remove arbitrarily one of the survey points but we loose some information
- merge the points into one node and merge the tags using
Christian Rogel christian.ro...@club-internet.fr writes:
I found a bit unsensitive Frederik Ramm's assumption that folks
willfully chained to their Hardware/OS supplier and that supplier is
unwilling to release Java6 for your platform, it may be time to finally
ditch that supplier (he
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this
location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged as
residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent compacted
gravel road, almost 2-car wide primarily for agricultural use, although
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net writes:
Nick Black wrote:
The current mechanism by which Mapzen and Mapzen POI Collector
users authenticate against OSM is horrible for users.
At the risk of being really hand-wavy and imprecise, I'd just say: Twitter's
OAuth UI is really exemplary.
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Ian ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI: Most of the information present on USGS Topo Maps should already be
present on the map due to an import of the GNIS dataset a couple years ago.
And fixing that import so that the GNIS
On that matter -- I've been working on an idea for a GNIS microtasking
platform. What it would do is:
* Show a random non-improved GNIS point in your neighborhood - name +
map
* Allow you to 1) drag the point to the correct location, 2) flag it
as no longer existing or 3) flag
A common method of photo surveying in OSM is to take a picture of the
GPS while it displays the GPS Satellite time. On the eTrex 30, I can
only display the time to the nearest minute. Has anyone found a
screen to display the seconds? If not, it is useless as a reference
time
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi,
On 01/28/2012 05:59 AM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Keeping in
mind that I am in support of the license switch, I think it's
completely reasonable to expect a technical plan for a switch just 60
days in the future.
You talk about reasonable - I
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-120401.osm.bz2.md5
Is that going to be torrented? I would think many people want a copy...
pgpIVnbkpUs0J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
To be honest, if a road has no classification, and is made of mud
and gravel, it's a track...
The ones I reclassified typically had two wheel-tracks of soil-colour
and grass
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Since you[1] are trying to revise guidelines that are found to be
acceptable across the community
Could you provide evidences about this ? Since the vast majority of
the community
I noticed this morning a map on boston.com (which is part of the Globe,
it seems):
http://www.boston.com/news/weather/specials/hurricane_sandy_reports_mapped/
The map data looked like it was from nOSM, but there was no attribution
(only that it used leaflet), so I wondered. I sent a note to
Robin Paulson ro...@bumblepuppy.org writes:
i've done some quite detailed editing near where i live, i'd
appreciate anyone who is interested taking a look and responding.
i'm not sure what to make of the result. for one, my partner, a
non-mapper, has told me she finds it very confusing,
Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com writes:
Hi All,
So I met with a group looking to link OSM data to other data. Meaning
have a link that says this village in OSM is equivalent to this
village in these 3 other datasets. Part of this process involves
having metadata for everything.
The people
Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr writes:
2013/1/5 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
I suppose the obvious question is: what was -your- source for the building
outlines? It is a fair assumption that google is simply using the same.
It is even more obvious that it is not a plain copy of OSM
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/1/6 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 06/01/2013 16:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
The problem is with the mapper mixing up linear and polygon features on
the same osm object.
I completely disagree with this. He mapped it accurately
Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm writes:
Hi Julien,
Could it be possible to integrate the user classification visible
here ( http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc) by example by adding the
same coloured man icon on the right of OSM User link. IMHO it could
be very usefull to know if an edit
Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com writes:
Why do you want to see outlines autogenerated from aerial imagery, you
could just look at the aerial imagery?
That's not true. For example, when converting to garmin format,
buildings render with very few bits, and let you know developed vs
Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com writes:
On 08/01/2013 21:31, Rovastar wrote:
My idea is simple can someone add modern social media networks logos/links
to the home page.
As a member of the OSMF Communications Working Group (CWG), I have
perhaps the greatest level of involvement in
Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com writes:
I would also add that the section on PDOP is rather technical for a
newbie. Perhaps this could be moved to a separate wiki page and the
answer to the question changed to be more general. If your GPS has a
display then this is more likely to be
Andreas Reuleaux reule...@web.de writes:
I am about to get a newer Garmin nvi model for car navigation,
and want to use OSM maps with it.
I found several web pages, which suggest that in general
OSM maps on a nvi should not be any problem, but the models
listed on
Andreas Reuleaux reule...@web.de writes:
OK, thanks a lot. I am beginning to understand. But does that mean, the
nüvi 40, although it is the cheapest model, is the newest one?
I believe the 40/50 are the newest.
LM stands for lifetime maps, T for traffic - right?
Yes.
...which would
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/3/30 Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
Define long-term.
I think you can't define this on a global level, it depends heavily on the
local activity whether it makes sense to enter a mid-term interruption into
OSM or ignore it.
Agreed that
colliar colliar4e...@aol.com writes:
On 09.06.2013 20:33, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I agree that it should be possible to update notes after the fact.
malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote:
On 08.06.2013 22:22, James Mast wrote:
I'm curious, but does anybody think that notes should
I'd like to see two things different; both of these are regressions from
the old way and I think easy to address
add the shortlink link in the lower right, so you can more easily use
it to get to a URL for the current view, so you can shift-reload to
see what yfou just edited. (Moving the
John Firebaugh john.fireba...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I'd like to see two things different; both of these are regressions from
the old way and I think easy to address
I believe that persisting the location and zoom in the URL
Question 1 : is culvert commonly used by native english speakers ? Is that
a term mainly used by civil engineers ?
I understand it to be a passage under a road that isn't big enough for a
vehicle - maybe a 0.5m pipe for water, or maybe just big enough for some
animals, but a human going
Mike N. nice...@att.net writes:
FYI - I saw this post and it has some interesting possibilities for
community building. Mappers like gadgets and Ham radio people are
interested in ways to apply their hobby...
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9747
Indeed. There are about 6
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
what i see a bit right now in the US are places where we have
a central node from one import and a boundary with the same
name from another, and as a result two names showing up.
it's mildly annoying.
That may be true but Kurt is right.For
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
On 1/3/11 9:51 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.net writes:
That may be true but Kurt is right.For most towns in New England
there is a polygon for the boundary, and then a specific place, often an
intersection
I would think the intent of original taggers is that highway=unsurfaced
was that they were real roads that aren't paved vs tracks.
So I'd map
highway=unsurfaced
to
highway=unclassified
surface=unpaved
note=review:was-highway-unsurfaced
or something like that.
Have you looked at a
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Alex Mauer wrote:
Which one were you thinking of? I count two road types in your list:
highway=track and highway=unclassified. And it could be other highway=*
types too.
Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com writes:
Pieren writes:
Are we forced to read every two months the same thread, the same
approximations, the same lies, the same trolls on this list ?
The strength of OSM is its community, not its license. If relicensing
hurts the community (which it
are the following tags rendering on the main openstreetmap renderers?
If so, can designation=public_footpath appear without highway=footway.
If so, that does then bring up the issue of good rendering, and
I think you are conflating two things:
in tagging, it makes sense to describe both
Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com writes:
Does someone know if there is some sort of relationship between OSM and
Garmin?
The reason I'm asking is that
1) as you may know OSM is the only good enough map (data) for Haiti that
e.g. makes routing possible -- now or in the
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
Switching focus to iD: there would be list of post edit notification
plugins one could drag into place.
Facebook, Twitter and G+ would be among those, along with whatever open
source version you happen to track down or create.
Anyone not wanting to
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com writes:
Track is used more and more for unpaved roads. Mapnik and other renderers
are probably a big reason, because they don't render
Surfacehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Surfaceand
Smoothness http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness tags. I
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW osrm.at is helping in this campaign, because it doesn't route through
tracks
BTW I just discover that some people are tagging for routing (after
tagging for the renderer). They add
John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com writes:
So, how would you classify a one-lane road leading through a former
field, now overgrown with 30 years or so of bushes and saplings,
leading to a billboard adjoining a motorway? The only improvements the
road receives is to be mowed periodically
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk writes:
Lester Caine wrote:
Basically - does anybody have a smartphone option that correctly and safely
handles UK motorways and trunk roads?
Well I'm seeing some feedback off-list, and there have been a few
steps forward, but The one thing I have finally
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi Same but different for the Kettleman Station node, this has been
imported 5 years ago from a GNIS data set and deserves no more respect
than the rest - if there's nobody living there then it's likely not a
hamlet.
It's true that it's not hamlet.
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
there is some bad data in the GNIS import. when i encounter obviously
bogus objects from the GNIS import, i just delete them. just the other
day i deleted a GNIS object which suggested someone had a heliport in
their back yard a little south of
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I think this is a good example of where notes are the way to go. A badly
positioned node is only likely to be spotted by a mapper who is
specifically interested in bike
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Also, if a tag isn't rendered in the default mapnik view, then those
elements are unlikely to be cleaned up (absent a special render for a
community of interest, which the cyclemap
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 25/02/2015 05:00, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Any fixme in wide use I'm not interested in deleting.
I'd strongly oppose the mechanical deletion of low volume fixme values.
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
6) Lazy Requests to do cleanup that the note writer did not want to do
themselves.
That's unnecessarily perjorative. I've seen a number of notes around me
that could be characterized that way, and I've entered a number myself.
I view it as a public
Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure I get your point about hint for router versus aid for
navigation. I suspect this may stem from the don't tag for the renderer
rule. If we look at the end use case the aim is to get a routing engine
that provides an optimal route
Simon Poole si...@poole.ch writes:
I've produced an updated version of the OSM privacy policy:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Updated_Privacy_Policy (the original
resides here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy).
I have a few big-picture comments so I'm sending them to
Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com writes:
Do you think it is necessary, for the general user, to visually
distinguish unsealed (unpaved/poor surface) footways/cycleways/paths
from those that are sealed? This has been raised in an issue related
to unsealed roads (with focus on
1 - 100 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
