Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On Wednesday, May 24, 2023, 21:59:21, Marck Pearlstone wrote: > The situation is that the processes are already under close scrutiny (using > System Explorer and procexp) and the sole TB process is hanging on startup > with no other TB processes in the system. ProcExp has shown none of the TB

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 24/05/2023 20:50, Stuart Cuddy wrote: Hello Marck, Wednesday, May 24, 2023, 2:22:08 PM, you wrote: Weird. If you download Process Explorer > , run it and The Bat, > double-click thebat.exe in Process Explorer and check the Threads tab > – it

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

Hello Marck, Wednesday, May 24, 2023, 2:22:08 PM, you wrote: >> Weird. If you download Process Explorer > >> , run it and The Bat, > >> double-click thebat.exe in Process Explorer and check the Threads tab > – it >> should show you where it hung. >

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 24/05/2023 19:28, Jernej Simončič wrote: Weird. If you download Process Explorer , run it and The Bat, double-click thebat.exe in Process Explorer and check the Threads tab – it should show you where it hung. It's not showing a hung thread, but

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On Wednesday, May 24, 2023, 20:22:36, Marck Pearlstone wrote: > Sadly, prayers unanswered and stability not maintained. I just found TB > completely unresponsive in the tooltray, terminated, re-ran and I'm back to > locked out. Weird. If you download Process Explorer

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 23/05/2023 12:55, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, 12:38:49, Marck Pearlstone wrote: Then I ran 10.3.3.16 and here I am again. I've taken the opportunity to toggle the option and will now pray for stability. I hope it helps. Sadly, prayers unanswered and stability not

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 23/05/2023 12:55, Jernej Simončič wrote: Then I ran 10.3.3.16 and here I am again. I've taken the opportunity to toggle the option and will now pray for stability. I hope it helps. Cheers -- Marck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user OpenPGP_0x39E424AB929DCDA0.asc

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

>> Hello George,  >>> AFAIR, running CEF in single kills showing attached documents inside TB! Am >>> I wrong?  >> Not exactly, it affects PDF viewer (documents are still being rendered in >> the latest version, but functionality is reduced) and Web browser in RSS >> feeds (pages could be

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

Hello George,  AFAIR, running CEF in single kills showing attached documents inside TB! Am I wrong?  Not exactly, it affects PDF viewer (documents are still being rendered in the latest version, but functionality is reduced) and Web browser in RSS feeds (pages could be rendered incorrectly

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 23 May 2023 at 15:02 Георгий, Белрус wrote and made these points >>> Setting the single process option (and restarting TB) should work around >>> that. GS> AFAIR, running CEF in single kills showing attached documents inside TB! Am I wrong? The switch says that it "could be unstable on

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

Howdy! > Вы писали 23 мая 2023 г., 15:44:45: >> On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, 13:57:11, Marck Pearlstone wrote: Preferences → General → Run CEF browser in single process >>> I have exactly the same issue with LibreOffice here. >> Setting the single process option (and restarting TB) should

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, 13:57:11, Marck Pearlstone wrote: > I have exactly the same issue with LibreOffice here. Setting the single process option (and restarting TB) should work around that. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< https://eternallybored.org/ > In specifications, Murphy's Law

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 23 May 2023 at 12:55 Jernej Simončič wrote and made these points >> Then I ran 10.3.3.16 and here I am again. I've taken the opportunity to >> toggle the option and will now pray for stability. JS> I hope it helps. There is something weird with TB's CEF – unless I have that option enabled,

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On Tuesday, May 23, 2023, 12:38:49, Marck Pearlstone wrote: > Then I ran 10.3.3.16 and here I am again. I've taken the opportunity to > toggle the option and will now pray for stability. I hope it helps. There is something weird with TB's CEF – unless I have that option enabled, certain

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 22 May 2023 at 14:59 Jernej Simončič wrote and made these points JS> I've been thinking about this for the last several days – can you maybe run an older version of The Bat, and change the setting there, then update? So - I installed 10.1, which didn't run, downloaded and installed the v103

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On Monday, May 22, 2023, 13:52:46, Marck Pearlstone wrote: > (sent again because of white font used in reply - Thunderbird - sheesh). I never even noticed with your previous message :) I've been thinking about this for the last several days – can you maybe run an older version of The Bat, and

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 19/05/2023 10:55, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Friday, May 19, 2023, 10:07:12, Marck Pearlstone wrote: I am completely locked out of TB. Every update that has come since 10.3.3.3 runs for about 3 days but always grinds to a halt, has to be terminated with Taskman and it won't work again. It

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

Hi Jernej, On 19/05/2023 10:55, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Friday, May 19, 2023, 10:07:12, Marck Pearlstone wrote: I am completely locked out of TB. Every update that has come since 10.3.3.3 runs for about 3 days but always grinds to a halt, has to be terminated with Taskman and it won't

Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On Friday, May 19, 2023, 10:07:12, Marck Pearlstone wrote: > I am completely locked out of TB. Every update that has come since 10.3.3.3 > runs for about 3 days but always grinds to a halt, has to be terminated with > Taskman and it won't work again. It just hangs trying to draw the main

Re: Fwd: Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

Howdy! > Вы писали 19 мая 2023 г., 11:07:12: >> On 18/05/2023 09:58, Георгий, Белрус wrote: >>>     [-] The "Access Violation" and "A component named FolderEditor >>>     already exists" error messages on opening folder properties have >>>     been fixed >>> - I do have installed 3-3-3-16 two

Re: Fwd: Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

On 18/05/2023 09:58, Георгий, Белрус wrote: [-] The "Access Violation" and "A component named FolderEditor already exists" error messages on opening folder properties have been fixed - I do have installed 3-3-3-16 two days already, it's better than previous. But I still have it

Re: Fwd: Re: 10.3.3.16 Access Violation

Howdy! Вы писали 16 мая 2023 г., 18:09:26: Tuesday, May 16, 2023, 4:30:05 PM, you wrote: > Hello, > The Bat! v10.3.3.16 is with further improvements: > Versions with the auto-update feature: > 64-bit  > https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/v10/thebat_64_10-3-3-16.msi > [-] The