Charlene,
On 13-10-2004 23:06, you [CF] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CF People are different, and a product such as TB is should match each
CF and every user's needs.
(Snip)
CF Not to upset you, just to let you know: the 1.6x could handle such
CF XXL-things perfectly, the stable releases of
Hello Charlene!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 at 11:30:04 PM you wrote:
You need not to zip the file(s), TB does for you. In my case the
format is RAR, don't know if it is the TB-standard or not since I
use RAR.
I'd rather suggest to compress nonetheless; there's solutions out
there that do
Hi Dierk Haasis,
Thursday, October 14, 2004
you put on your sharpest glasses and informed me -us-:
I'd rather suggest to compress nonetheless; there's solutions out
there that do compress very large files into a number of smaller ones
with the user specifying the upper limit, like classical
Hello Bill,
You failed to include the new help file :-( I've been
watching each of the RAR files released - it has never
been included.
As far as I know, RAR files never include anything but the thebat.exe
file.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
Hi MAU,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
you lifted one eyebrow and looked me very severe into my eyes and
whispered:
Am I understanding you correctly? Are you talking about a 70 MB e-mail
message?
This is correct, but it is no single mail since TB can automatically
split and send on the one end
Hello Charlene,
you lifted one eyebrow and looked me very severe into my eyes and
whispered:
No, I didn't do that. ;-)
I just _typed_ or _wrote_:
Am I understanding you correctly? Are you talking about a 70 MB e-mail
message?
And you replied:
This is correct, but it is no single mail
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 2:40 PM, you wrote:
M A 70MB email! Oh dear!
I am sending you a star for common-sense, Miguel, even though I
cherish Charlene's meticulous testing and her dedication.
In fact, I offer you 2 stars--no 5 stars--for all your marvelous
testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello MAU,
On 13 October 2004 at 21:40:32GMT +0200 (which was 20:40 where I live)
MAU wrote and made these points on the subject of fix for the panel
bug:
M I'd kill anyone who sent me a 70MB email, whether multi-part or not. I
M have my own server
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
you made me smile when just_typing_or_writing:
I'd kill anyone who sent me a 70MB email, whether multi-part or not. I
have my own server for most accounts I use, with no limitation on
mailbox sizes, but I'd kill him anyway.
People are different, and a
Hi Maria Cristina Ramos,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
you decided to contribute to our discussion by typing:
M I'd kill anyone who sent me a 70MB email, whether multi-part or not. I
M have my own server for most accounts I use, with no limitation on
M mailbox sizes, but I'd kill him anyway.
Charlene Ferrara, [CF] wrote:
People are different, and a product such as TB is should match each and
every user's needs.
E-mail was not intended for that type of transmission and I hope when
it's being done, it is only over a local LAN and via the LAN
mailserver, right? These are not mails
Hello Mary,
I am sending you a star
I'd prefer a cup of your delicious coffee :)
In fact, I offer you 2 stars--no 5 stars--for all your marvelous
testing contributions, also.
You're so sweet Mary. When you send me the cup of coffee don't put any
sugar in it, just stirring it with your
Hello Maria,
You live far away and you don't travel much, right?
Well, El Escorial is next to Madrid and that is not so far from Lisbon.
About travelling, in the past couple of weeks I've been to UK and Italy
and I should travel to Lisbon before the end of month (and this is
true). But you
Hello Charlene,
People are different,
Certainly and thanks God. This world would be quite boring otherwise.
and a product such as TB is should match each and every user's needs.
Great idea, because I need a new carpet for my living room ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hello MAU,
But you should be afraid...
NOT ^
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Winamp Playing: Ben Tankard - Piano Prophet. (Smoothjazz.Com - The
worlds best Smooth Jazz - Live From Monterey Bay)
Hello Tbbeta,
We've uploaded the EXE file that contains the fix for the panel bug to
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_rc10.rar
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
Could you please test it and confirm that the panel bug box has been really fixed,
and the AV
On 2004-10-12 at 21:36:43 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
Confirmed.
Could you please test it and confirm that the panel bug box has
been really fixed, and the AV bug never appear?
Haven't yet seen any AV, and I've tried hard, but couldn't reproduce
Hello Maxim!
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 2:36 PM, you wrote:
MM We've uploaded the EXE file that contains the fix for the
MM panel bug to
MM www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_rc10.rar
Downloaded and installed.
MM It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
It does
Hi Maxim Masiutin,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
you delighted us with the announcement:
We've uploaded the EXE file that contains the fix for the panel
bug to www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_rc10.rar
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
It does, and in support
Hello Maxim,
Could you please test it and confirm that the panel bug box has been really fixed,
and
the AV bug never appear?
Preview panel fine here and no AVs so far. But please let us test for
another couple of minutes, OK? 30 seconds? ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial
Hello Maxim Masiutin everyone else
12-Okt-2004 21:36, you wrote:
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
It does.
Could you please test it and confirm that the panel bug box has been
really fixed, and the AV bug never appear?
No AV's (but then again, I hadn't had any with the
Maxim Masiutin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev / wrote:
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
It does!
Could you please test it and confirm that the panel bug box has been
really fixed, and the AV bug never appear?
No AV's and not bug that I have seen so far!
Looks like a stable
Hi Kian Andersen,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Maxim Masiutin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) skrev / wrote:
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
It does!
Could you please test it and confirm that the panel bug box has been
really fixed, and the AV bug
Hi Maxim and list,
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 at 22:36:43 GMT +0300 (which was 21:36
where I live) Maxim Masiutin wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of fix for the panel bug:
It should display 3.0.1.33 in the About box.
OK
Could you please test
Hi C.Ferrara,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
I myself wrote obviously under the heavy load of a good cabernet:
Slowly, no time to hurry!
Meant no need to hurry
Can someone implement a syntax-checker? Maybe in 3.02?
--
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Charlene!
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 4:02 PM, you wrote:
CF Slowly, no time to hurry!
CF Meant no need to hurry
Is the same--it's called leaving part of the main clause to inference,
has a a technical name I can't get up in my head at the moment.
Anyway, would be diagrammed as [This
Hello Charlene,
Slowly, no time to hurry! The assembly of a big multipart message still
fails in .33 and the CPU load as well as the memory consumption is at a
inacceptable high level while assembly is in progress. Anyways, out of
memory box shows up (mailsize overall some 70 megs)...
Am I
On Tue 12-Oct-04 2:36pm -0400, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
We've uploaded the EXE file that contains the fix for
the panel bug to
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_rc10.rar
I just copied that over my RC5 EXE. It still contains
the virutal folder count bug reported in:
mid
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:04:59 +0200, Charlene Ferrara wrote:
[Frenzied bugfixing activity at RitLabs]
Thank you
Thank you?! What do you think RitLabs is? Some kind of
TB! User Welfare Organisation?
and have a good sleep, you really have earned it.
And what about those poor lost souls aka The
29 matches
Mail list logo
