Re: ports.7

2010-03-04 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:46:18PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: Boolean variables should be set to Yes instead of simply being defined, for uniformity and future compatibility. This takes time to finish changing. 1.) The majority of the scripts in ports/infrastructure do not bother

[no subject]

2010-03-04 Thread betty . happy
We must protect our planet. Turn off your computer! Nous devons protC)ger notre planC(te. C teignez votre ordinateur! Debemos proteger nuestro planeta. Apague su ordenador! Musimy chroniD naszD planetD. WyEDcz komputer! PQ P4PP;P6P=Q P7P0Q P8QP8QQ P=P0QQ P?P;P0P=P5QQ. PQ

Re: Mdnsd project

2010-03-04 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
Ooops forgot to mention. Use it only for one interface, I've not tested with multiple interfaces: example: ./mdnsd -d em0 too lookup a hostname: ./mdnscltl lookup hostname.local I've just commited two diffs that would case an infinite loop while parsing SRV records. Any feedback would be nice

LCD 21.5 Philips (Full 1080p), CALIDAD y PRECIO en NEW TREE

2010-03-04 Thread NewTree
New Tree - Mail de Novedades Los das Jueves entregamos Gratis en la ciudad de La Plata pedidos cuyo monto superen los U$S 300. Para montos inferiores a U$S 300, se debern abonar $ 25. Los das Martes y Viernes entregamos Gratis en Galera Jardn !--

Re: ports.7

2010-03-04 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:14:52AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:38:12 +0100 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:46:18PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: Boolean variables should be set to Yes instead of simply being defined, for uniformity and

Re: ports.7

2010-03-04 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:38:12 +0100 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:46:18PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: Boolean variables should be set to Yes instead of simply being defined, for uniformity and future compatibility. This takes time to finish changing. 1.)

Re: uvm_map improvements

2010-03-04 Thread Anton Maksimenkov
Since I not found any support of that idea I think it is better to keep things simple. So I introduce implementation of the ReScan idea. The diff must be almost the same as in the first message in thread. I added some logic into uvm_map_findspace(). If it can't found reasonable gap using hint it

Re: uvm_map improvements

2010-03-04 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Anton Maksimenkov anton...@gmail.com wrote: Since I not found any support of that idea I think it is better to keep things simple. So I introduce implementation of the ReScan idea. Independent of any technical merits, I think this has more to do with release

Re: ports.7

2010-03-04 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:21:34 +0100 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:14:52AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:38:12 +0100 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:46:18PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: Boolean

/arch/i386/stand/Makefile

2010-03-04 Thread J.C. Roberts
There is no '-r' flag for disklabel. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u Makefile --- Makefile25 Nov 2007 18:25:31 - 1.15 +++ Makefile4 Mar 2010

Solicitud de Informacion

2010-03-04 Thread El Genuino
PACK E-MAIL PREMIUM La Mayor Base de Datos de E-Mails jamas Recopilada Actualizada al 30 de Septiembre de 2009!!! Pedidos: (011)(15) 6263-7899 www.elgenuino.zobyhost.com Transmita su idea, haga conocer su oferta, su negocio o envme su Curriculum a nada mas y nada menos que a

installboot.8

2010-03-04 Thread J.C. Roberts
The deleted statement is not true for i386 (probably no longer true) and similar statements are in the BUGS section (rather than the main body) of the installboot.8 man pages for other archs. The statements about securelevel requirements in the other archs are often somewhat different than i386.

Re: installboot.8

2010-03-04 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:56:30PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: The deleted statement is not true for i386 (probably no longer true) and similar statements are in the BUGS section (rather than the main body) of the installboot.8 man pages for other archs. The statements about securelevel