Hi Luigi,
you are perfectly right with the stem directions. I am still in a phase
of prototyping where I try to catch as much information as possible from
the XML Format.
The same is true for beams. For example in the Telemann Flute Fantasy
every beam is explicitely described in the XML
Dieter wrote:
...when I discard
the beam information, PMX and MusixTex produce 99 % of the beaming as
desired. Only one beam with a 16th rest in the middle has to be manually
inserted.
It's true that PMX will not automatically insert a beam across e.g. g1 r g g
. Do you think it should? It
WIth Tenor clef it looks much better.
Regards, DIeter
Am 03.12.2014 17:09, schrieb Don Simons:
When you set (npages,nsystems) to (0,20) you are asking PMX to squeeze
20 bars on average into each system. PMX seemed OK with that but
MusiXTeX was not. I tried (0,5), and it went through just
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:01:49 +0100
Dieter d.gloet...@web.de wrote:
WIth Tenor clef it looks much better.
Regards, DIeter
Dear Dieter,
tenor clef is the right choice, but I think that the problem comes with the
fact that every note has own stem direction inserted in the code, like, I
4 matches
Mail list logo
