On 2/10/24 11:11 AM, Greg Troxel via Tiff wrote:
OK, but it seems that "hylafax.org" is not maintained. Does ~everybody
think that hylafax.org is no longer relevant to anything?
The Debian (and therefore Ubutnu) HylaFAX package maintainer is still
using it, for whatever reason. Of course,
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024, Greg Troxel via Tiff wrote:
and the change in project libtiff-> 4.6.0 is fatal for the tiff
tools used in HylaFAX+.
OK, but it seems that "hylafax.org" is not maintained. Does ~everybody
think that hylafax.org is no longer relevant to anything?
Is "HylaFAX+" a
Holger Bruenjes via Tiff writes:
> Hello
>
> Am 10/02/2024 um 15.10 schrieb Greg Troxel via Tiff:
>> Greg Troxel writes (in *September 2023*):
>>
>>> I am really unclear on whether there will be fallout from tools removal.
>>> Again not a complaint; I just don't like surprises. My expectation
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024, Greg Troxel via Tiff wrote:
I am inclined to take the position:
hylafax is unmaintained and it's just aging out of working. While
that's unfortunate, it needs to be fixed upstream and it's not
reasonable to expect packaging systems to work around problems in
software
Hello
Am 10/02/2024 um 15.10 schrieb Greg Troxel via Tiff:
Greg Troxel writes (in *September 2023*):
I am really unclear on whether there will be fallout from tools removal.
Again not a complaint; I just don't like surprises. My expectation is
very little to maybe none, and that if so it
Greg Troxel writes (in *September 2023*):
> I am really unclear on whether there will be fallout from tools removal.
> Again not a complaint; I just don't like surprises. My expectation is
> very little to maybe none, and that if so it will be run time not
> build/install/package time. So if
> William – are you (and others) still working with a PS-based workflow? Why
> not move to something more modern (aka PDF)?
I have a print publishing system that is a few million lines of code with a
composition engine with comments that go back to 1982. It does all of the work
in eps, and
> > I am really unclear on whether there will be fallout from tools removal.
> I have scripts that use tiff2ps. ImageMagick can convert tiffs to ps, but
some versions of ImageMagick shift or scale the image. tiff2ps works.
> I think that with a ps-based workflow, tiff2ps is the best tools to
>> William - are you (and others) still working with a PS-based workflow?
Why not move ot something more modern (aka PDF)?
I may even agree with that somewhat, but tiff2pdf was also deprecated. And
don't point me to ImageMagick and such like, it's not the same thing, some
of the
reg Troxel
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2023 3:26 PM
To: Even Rouault
Cc: tiff@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4.6.0 is released
Even Rouault writes:
> I've promoted rc2 as the final 4.6.0 release.
Thanks for all your efforts on tiff.
> Read about this release a
iff@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Tiff] libtiff 4.6.0 is released
Even Rouault writes:
> I've promoted rc2 as the final 4.6.0 release.
Thanks for all your efforts on tiff.
> Read about this release at
> https://libtiff.gitlab.io/libtiff/releases/v4.6.0.html
>
> Pay attention to the
Even Rouault writes:
> I've promoted rc2 as the final 4.6.0 release.
Thanks for all your efforts on tiff.
> Read about this release at
> https://libtiff.gitlab.io/libtiff/releases/v4.6.0.html
>
> Pay attention to the following warning:
>
> This version removes a big number of utilities
12 matches
Mail list logo
