Thanks Don
For all the nuts that want the analysis with math and fancy papers on how
(or why) the TPLL works.
They will find the whole thing on one line on page 4-21 of that paper.
(page 110)
That's about it and all that is needed, if one also understands how to do
integration by oversampling
In message 8f43d37e769b4caab3309830e40dd...@warcon28gz, WarrenS writes:
That is really all there is to it, if one starts with Frequency differences,
like the TPLL, and not Phase, like most other methods, to get the raw data
to use with an ADEV program like PLOTTER.
While it is absolutely true
So now we, those that want a little more than faith, are nuts. Some day
when you learn how to speak to people with respect, you too may get some
respect of your own.
Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not know the difference.
Never wrestle with a pig, you will only get dirty, and the pig
Careful, I would never renounce my nuttiness, lest something awful happen to
me list-wise :)
Ed
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Robert Benward
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 12:36 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and
Poul-Henning posted:
While it is absolutely true that you can calculate ADEV from frequency
measurements,
No disagreement there,
you have a very tough row to hoe when it comes to proving
that your frequency samples represent the same signal as a sequence
of zero deadtime period measurements
In message 0c4f750835264e13ab61d4b8c8448...@warcon28gz, WarrenS writes:
you have a very tough row to hoe when it comes to proving
that your frequency samples represent the same signal as a sequence
of zero deadtime period measurements would do.
Sorry, I though that was obvious.
Yes, you
Poul-Henning posted
Yes, you probably did. (Think it was obvious)
TRUE, it is obvious to me, but then I've had the advantage of being able to
test the TPLL to find the answers to things that I did not understand at
first.
So is there some part that is not obvious to you?
Maybe someone
After reading the content in some of your private emails to me, and hearing
you call others derogatory names, it is obvious you tend speak to others
with disdain and disrespect.
I'm not convinced you were refering to us as in an endearing manner.
Bob
- Original Message -
From:
In message 415e11efec7b46ffb05a790f4f4a4...@warcon28gz, WarrenS writes:
Poul-Henning posted
So is there some part that is not obvious to you?
Yes, it is painfully obvious to me, that you are so in love with
your idea, that no argument will ever penetrate your defensive
shield.
Please look up
On 23 June 2010 04:36, Robert Benward rbenw...@verizon.net wrote:
So now we, those that want a little more than faith, are nuts. Some day
when you learn how to speak to people with respect, you too may get some
respect of your own.
You have subscribed to a Yahoo group called time-nuts so I
On 23 June 2010 03:29, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message 8f43d37e769b4caab3309830e40dd...@warcon28gz, WarrenS writes:
That is really all there is to it, if one starts with Frequency differences,
like the TPLL, and not Phase, like most other methods, to get the raw data
to
Poul,
On 23 June 2010 06:55, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message 0c4f750835264e13ab61d4b8c8448...@warcon28gz, WarrenS writes:
you have a very tough row to hoe when it comes to proving
that your frequency samples represent the same signal as a sequence
of zero deadtime
Poul,
I can see that you are somewhat frustrated with all of this but let's
please try to understand what is going on with the design and not get
bogged down with interpersonal issues.
On 23 June 2010 09:35, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message
Steve,
It is admirable that you stick up for Warren. Part of Warren's problem is
his disrespect for some of the other commenters of his work. The name
calling and put downs just does not endear him to anyone. Saying to someone
that they made a dumb mistake, and if they can't see the obvious
Um, This group/list/reflector is NOT related to Yahoo, but is hosted on febo.com
thanks to John Ackerman, N8UR. Thanks, John
John Allen K1AE
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf
Of Steve Rooke
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:19
At the local flea market, I picked up what appears to be an Efratom
FRS-C. It is marked TTL internally. It has the passive connector
board, but not the active board with the 15 MHz synthesizer on it.
Mine is marked TTL internally. The service manual has a chart showing
the differences
Leigh, I have the same FRS-C TTL unit. I do not have a manual.
Would you be so kind as to send the conversation info to me?
Thanks,
Dave W6TE
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L. Klotz, Jr WA5ZNUmailto:le...@wa5znu.org
To: time nutsmailto:time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, June
What load do you have it running into? It maybe that you need to load
it into 50 ohms.
Steve
On 23 June 2010 16:54, Leigh L. Klotz, Jr WA5ZNU le...@wa5znu.org wrote:
At the local flea market, I picked up what appears to be an Efratom FRS-C.
It is marked TTL internally. It has the passive
18 matches
Mail list logo
