N.B. The Filter mapping code looks broken to me. It looks like if I have a
mapping for a url-pattern '*.jsp' that has dispatcherINCLUDE/dispatcher,
then it will incorrectly match a jsp:include page=header.jspf /.
However, I haven't actually tested it. :).
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
:
Bill Barker wrote:
N.B. The Filter mapping code looks broken to me. It looks like if I
have a
mapping for a url-pattern '*.jsp' that has
dispatcherINCLUDE/dispatcher,
then it will incorrectly match a jsp:include page=header.jspf /.
However, I haven't actually tested it. :).
I
You could try asking on the users list for more info. TC 3.2.x has been
unsupported for a very long time. The only advice I can offer is to upgrade
to a supported version of Tomcat (e.g. 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x).
- Original Message -
From: Katalin Fónagy (IJ/ETH) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
RealmBase.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this looks like it changed between pfd3 to fr :(. Security-constraints
now work like 'grants' instead of 'constraints'. IMHO, this make the 2.4
security model all but useless.
whine
It would be natural to configure something like:
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
to change
to only pass back the 'best-match' constraints. At least this isn't an
interface change. The decision on whether to change the Realm interface, or
move the header processing to AuthenticatorBase is still open.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
jfarcand2003/12/01 12:44:14
Modified:
The secureCookie attribute was added to 3.3.2 only to allow backwards
compatibility with 3.3.1. Like Tomcat 4 and higher, the default is 'true'.
It's a pretty small patch:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/mod
ules/session/SessionId.java.diff?r1=1.20r2=1.21
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I got a support question about LB with mod_jk 2 (and I saw posts about
that on tomcat-user).
Either there's something I don't understand, or the
jk2_get_most_suitable_worker method in jk_worker_lb will always
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Remy,
Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread,
I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the
new behavior:
Unless there is some
+1
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:19 PM
Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Mark Thomas
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Mark Thomas as a Tomcat committer. He has
contibuted a significant
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Response.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker
LocalStrings.properties
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm -1 on this. It gives the Servlet no indication that anything is
wrong,
and leaves junk in the input stream for the next keep-alive request. I
think that it would be better to handle this in the Adaptor's
postParseRequest method.
I disagree
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 1:45 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteConnector.java CoyoteRequest.java LocalStrings.properties
remm2003/11/15
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:10 AM
Subject: [5.0] content-type and charset issues
Hi,
Tomcat 5.0 always adds a charset=ISO-8859-1 to the content type. While
this is I think
See inline.
- Original Message -
From: Tony LaPaso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 8:15 PM
Subject: TC 5.0.14 Breaks UTF-8 Content via HTTP Header
Hi everyone,
It seems a change to TC v5.0.14 may have broken the serving of
Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ApacheCon 2003 will be held in Las Vegas this November 16-19. Who is
going
to be there from Tomcat Dev? Maybe we can coordinate Tomcat get
together...
:-)
I have way too much work to stay for the conference :(. But I could
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Connector ObjectName includes address
Jan Luehe wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
Currently, connector objectname includes address in this format:
domain:type
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Connector ObjectName includes address
Bill Barker wrote:
Currently, connector objectname includes address in this format
AFAIK, IPlanet is still supported. However, there hasn't been an active
developer on the project for a very long time, and so there hasn't been
anyone to generate the binaries. I would suggest getting the source distro,
and compiling yourself. And, unless you plan to offer the binaries back,
- Original Message -
From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:01 PM
Subject: Connector ObjectName includes address
Currently, connector objectname includes address in this format:
Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy,
I agree we should help users come up with reasonable config values,
but I'm just afraid rejecting any maxThreads 10 or 20 will send the
wrong message, as if there was a bug in the way we dispatch incoming
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remy has been packaging Jasper in the j-t-4.1.x-src tarball (as jasper).
- Original Message -
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/
Hi,
I am playing
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: Coyote Connector logging
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
The Coyote docs state the following regarding
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: jk2 evolution plan
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
+1
I can help out.
This is a significant change for a minor revision to 2.0.4,
- Original Message -
From: Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: How to make CLIENT-CERT protection work?
Consider the following scenario:
1. Client sends POST request (with content type other than
+
+// Optimize on a common case.
+// If the source is going to fill up all the space in buffer,
may
+// as well write it directly to the output, and avoid an extra
copy
+if ( len == limit end == 0) {
+out.realWriteChars( src, off, len
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)
Henri Gomez wrote:
Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as
You will probably get more traction by posting to commons-dev. While
tomcat-dev still has a couple of commons committers (and, no, I'm not one of
them) that hang out here, its not like the old days :(.
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was:
Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?
Bill Barker a écrit
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:28 AM
Subject: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib
In TC 4.1.x and 5.0.x there is support for endorsed lib but
nothing like this in tc 3.3.2-dev.
Since
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib
Bill Barker a écrit :
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED
+/*
+ * Remove the charset param (if any) from the Content-Type, and
use it
+ * to set the response encoding.
+ * The most recent response encoding setting will be appended
to the
+ * response Content-Type (as its charset param) by
@@ -510,14 +509,19 @@
}
this.contentType = contentType.substring(0, beginCharsetParam);
-String tail = contentType.substring(beginCharsetParam + 1);
+// Trim the semicolon preceding the charset
+int charsetSemi =
Try http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/v4.1.28-alpha/. The 'alpha'
is just because it is still in it's evaluation stage. It's likely to
graduate to at least beta (if not 'stable'). However, your ability to test
it on an os/390 system makes you particularly valuable to the developers,
- Original Message -
From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: Committing binaries in CVS [Was] RE: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe
Remy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 2:00 PM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteConnector.java
luehe 2003/10/05 14:00:38
Modified:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
remm2003/10/04 11:05:29
Modified:
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
- Original Message
By the way, is there any plan to certify Tomcat 5? As everyone knows, Sun
controls the RI now. While it's rumored to be based on Tomcat code, that's
not the same thing. Also, as everyone knows, Geronimo is planning to test
the Sun/Apache agreement by getting the test-suite under the Sun/Apache
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0] Schedule change
Bill Barker wrote:
By the way, is there any plan to certify Tomcat 5? As everyone knows,
Sun
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?
Henri Gomez wrote:
Do you agree to use Coyote2 as the default HTTP connector for
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a
The only reason I know of not to use the MAIN branch is that it has JMX
dependencies.
- Original Message -
From: Larry Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:08 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?
I
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: [5.0] Schedule change
Hi,
The signals I'm getting from Sun about the schedule of the
specifications is highly confusing. Since
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 2:55 AM
Subject: TC 3.3.2
Hi to all,
I commited the last part of clean imports and started to take a look
at bugzilla where many reports seems still
Remy has already patched the HTTP Connector for this one (both Tomcat 45).
I believe that the patch still needs to be ported to the JK2 Connector.
- Original Message -
From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003
- Original Message -
From: David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Jakarta Tomcat 4.1 XSS vulnerability
On Mon, September 29, 2003 1at 2:32 pm, Bill Barker sent the following
Remy has already
I'm a bit confused by the scope for authentication. For purposes of
discussion, assume that there is a sub-section of my web-app that is
protected via:
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameProtected Area/web-resource-name
For me, doing a cvs log doesn't mention a 1.2.5 tag.
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: jk 1.2.5 release : Was: mod_jk does not detect a hung Tomcat
Did the jk 1.2.5
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Narrow down the list of JARs to be scanned for TLDs
Jan Luehe wrote:
Currently, any JARs in the classloader
It doesn't look like you got the servletapi-4 project (or it is in the wrong
place). Try doing:
ant download
to make certain that you've got all of the jars you need to build Tomcat.
If you are behind a firewall, you'll need to set the values of 'proxy.host'
and 'proxy.port' in your
Sorry, they were small, and I missed them.
Checked in now. Thanks again!
- Original Message -
From: Kazuhiro Kazama [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update Tomcat version to 5 in documents
From: Bill Barker
I've gone ahead and re-set the previously Resolved bugs back to Resolved.
My apologies to the very many people that I've spammed tonight doing this
:(.
I didn't reset the Assigned field on the grounds that most of the bugs are
ancient.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.12 stability rating
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[x] Beta
/ballot
I've lost the original
+1 From me as well.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Wannamaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: [patch] wrong rx to invalid url
Yes it can be, good catch.
Keith
| -Original Message-
|
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:58 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net
PoolTcpEndpoint.java
On 12 Sep 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
remm2003/09/08 02:31:38
Modified:.build.properties.default
Log:
- New PureTLS version.
- I'll be including PureTLS support in 5.0.11+.
While I'm +1, this may cause problems since at the moment Tomcat
Being as lazy as anyone else ;-), we prefer diff files. However, you're
script are very nice. I'd prefer that a little more attention was paid to
W9x support (since you've got several statements that will bomb on W9x).
- Original Message -
From: R. W. Stavros, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
It works fine for me. I just did an update on j-t-c, and a clean build of
Tomcat 5, and it worked fine (well, up until it got to the docs, but I've
still got an old version of xalan in ant :).
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
I'd go for 2) personally. If you force the POST parameters to UTF-8 (which
I understand is what '3' does), you break almost every web-app out there.
Granted, the request line (including the query-string) should be UTF-8, but
I haven't tested how many browsers actually enforce this. The POST
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/etc bootstrap.MF
remm2003/09/06 10:19:36
Modified:catalina/etc bootstrap.MF
Log:
- Modify the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native CHANGES.txt
glenn 2003/09/06 20:49:40
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Update changes
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:37 PM
Subject: jakarta-tomcat-connector release cleanup
I have promised to setup the tomcat connector releases so that they
can be mirrored when I perform the next
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0.10] Tag tomorrow
Bill Barker wrote:
I can post new binaries for procrun tomorrow (PST) to BZ (now that
Daemon
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: in_addr_t and Linux 2.2
FYI, in_addr_t is not defined on Redhat 6.2 which use kernel 2.2
and glibc 2.1.
And I thought myself a
- Original Message -
From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 22715
Resending. I seem to be having e-mail problems...
The patches below (TC5 and TC4) fix bug 22715 in that they ensure that xml
entities
I can post new binaries for procrun tomorrow (PST) to BZ (now that Daemon is
in commons-proper, I can't check-in directly :-(). This includes a patch
from JFC for W9x (that I missed in the last build), and a patch from Mladin
to limit memory usage in the console. Neither is particularly
I know that patches are always welcome, but a variant of this has been in
3.3.2-dev (aka nightly) for a very long time.
- Original Message -
From: Kubo Hiroshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:13 AM
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 22905 - set secure
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:58 AM
Subject: [5.0.10] New build ?
I think releasing a new build at the end of this week would be a good
idea, given that most issues with
Patch committed. Thanks much!
Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry. Only just noticed the attachment was removed somewhere along the
way.
Contents of patch below.
Index: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java
I'll put this one in in the interest of time, but Marc should be given karma
(like any other Tomcat committer) to j-t-c, if he doesn't have it already.
Marc Saegesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G, the attachment got stripped from my last message. Here's the
- Original Message -
From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/connector
connector.jsp
The AJP connector still lies,
Can you tell me what the
- Original Message -
From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:46 AM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common
jk_uri_worker_map.h jk_uri_worker_map.c
-Original Message-
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:40 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/connector
connector.jsp
amyroh 2003/08/28 19:40:52
Modified:
- Original Message -
From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:15 PM
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating]
resend again. my email's been getting lost for some reason.
Well, at least SOBIG is only around
- Original Message -
From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Amy Roh wrote:
I'll update the
Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Tim Funk wrote:
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Bill Barker wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED
- Original Message -
From: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k)
1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
/ballot
1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties.
2)
The easiest solution would be to change the map_uri_to_worker contract to be
that the uri parameter is modifiable. Then Apache can dup it using the
request's pool, it looks like IIS is doing this most of the time anyway, and
Netscape isn't using map_uri_to_worker at all. That leave Domino, which
Client-certs don't work with JkCoyote on 4.1.24. You need to use 4.1.27
(or, at least the tomcat-jk2.jar).
- Original Message -
From: Ben Sifuentes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: JkCoyoteHandler with SSL
While using Apache2.0.47
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues
which would need to be resolved by then ?
A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new
Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone
If you want to re-post your question on tomcat-user, I'd be more than happy
to answer your question. However, it is off-topic on this list.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 3:45 AM
Subject: which
- Original Message -
From: Torsten Fohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Q] Different handling tagfiles and normal tags classes
What about a seperate TAGFILE_SCOPE?
Not something that is under
Just make certain to close bug #19610 after the commit.
- Original Message -
From: Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 10:38 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Add keystoreAlias property to CoyoteConnector
I would like to add
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 4.1.27 Stable released
NAIK,ROSHAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Hi Remy,
Are these security bugs existing
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [5] Jasper currently requires a 1.4 JVM
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
o.a.j.compiler.JspUtil.makeJavaPackage currently is calling
o.a.j.compiler.JspUtil.makeJavaPackage currently is calling String.split.
This means that you currently can't use Jasper (at least for compiling) with
a 1.3.x JVM. Since Tomcat isn't a J2EE 1.4 container I can't see any
justification in the spec for not supporting 1.3.x JVMs. However, since I
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:13 PM
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteResponse.java
luehe 2003/08/12 17:13:43
Modified:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: Bug 19867
I have been looking into
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19867
and have a couple of questions.
The error seen in this
I'm going to assume that you're using 4.1.x. In this case, you are using
the wrong Factory. You want something like:
Connector httpsConnector = embeddedTomcat.createConnector(null,
configuration.getHttpsPort(), true);
CoyoteServerSocketFactory serverSocketFactory =
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday
Bill Barker wrote:
All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220,
21279
501 - 600 of 1050 matches
Mail list logo
