Sent: March 24, 2006 16:35
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
So you prefer that untruth be taught in schools. That's all that's left.
Pathetic IMO. izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, March
on
Creationism
Fortunately we
comprehend the truth since we believe Gods Word.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:30
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
Depending, certainly, upon who stated it.
iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 6:43
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
on Creationism
Less is more
You didnt answer the question.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:41 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Linda, I believe that de
And you accused Kevin of making
smart-assed replies???
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:51
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Who wouldn't
]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:13
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Public education was first offered as an alternaive to Christian
education.
jd
-- Original message
him. izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:01 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
What do I believe about Genesis? Did you read any o
chool aged child might need to learn I think. izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 11:04 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Are you t
Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:25 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Still no.- Original Message - From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG> Sent: March 2
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David you are like so right, man! familiaritycontempt...were those the
words? Probably got it comin'.
Actually Lady Iz, I prefer that untruth NOT be taught in schools (i.e.
creationism)
- Original Message -
From
: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Are you aware (seriously) that for a lengthy period people
believed God's Word AND believe in a geocentric universe?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 24, 2006
16:36
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
The history of public education is a little more complicated than
this. I think the more forceful argument was making education available
to those who were not wealthy. The non-sectarian nature of it came in
because
Until him the Bible was the basic textbook. izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David MillerSent: Friday, March 24, 2006 9:56 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
The history of public education is a little m
It ain't true. It's a hyperbolic hypothetical, Iz.
.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 24, 2006 17:16
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
That wasn't the question; I asked whether IF you believe
: March 22, 2006 15:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Well what are you about Lance Muir
Are you doing what God has called someone else to
do?
Are you criticizing what you think someone else is
doing that God didn't tell them to do?
Are you hearing God
Or, as on TT, theologically unknowing while
spiritually alive. This is much more the case.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 18:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw
HIGH Five[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:"Believe in God's word" is fundy code for "believe as I do." When we have been dispersed, take with you the knowledge that not one single Rad Fundy has given any of us a clue as to what "doctrine" they are talking about. You must obey the commandments
What is the point in pursuing dead letters when one
can
feast on a "living Word"
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:04:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or, as on TT, theologically unknowing while
spiritually alive. This is much more the case.
From: Judy Taylor
So
Spoken like a true studen of RJR.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 21:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ;
)[EMAIL PROTECTED
Why advocate teaching what you don't know JD? As
has already been noted "Only when we prove
evolution do we need to concern ourselves with
"harmonizing" evolutionism with theism. Evidence that
this level of proof has not been achieved includes the
long list of scientists and others who have
PROTECTED] wrote: Spoken like a true studen of RJR.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 22, 2006 21:05 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ; )[EMAIL PROTECTED
-
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 07:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
AGAIN you show your Short Comprehension
I am NOT a REFORMED CATHOLIC.
wrong slot Lance, better take it to your friends for a consensus
I am talking about what we teach in school and Judy comes back with something about"the secret things" and then Kevin, bless his little heart, comes back with something about reading the Bible --- NEW FLASH !!! ObviouslyTT as a DISCUSSION GROUP died some time ago !!
Over here , guys !! I am the
What in the hell do you think I have been talking about? You are so far off course here, as to be just plain silly. I am not a "big banger" nor do I believe that a lung fish is ancient family. In fact, I am with the growing opinion that there has not been enough time for evolution to have worked
Oh, I guess he does KNOW, Judy.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 08:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
What in the hell do you think I have
(he needsto be absolute
onwhat he's 'high-fiving', Bro:)
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
jd/*g:
"Believe in God's word" is * [typical techno legalistic..] code
for * " * [we're all damned
goin' t'hell fer not] believe[ing]
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:29:33 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What in the hell do you think I have been talking about? You
are so far off course here, as to be just plain silly. I am not a "big
banger" nor do I believe that a lung fish is ancient family. In
fact, I am with the
nglory.org ;
truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 08:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
on Creationism
What in the hell do you think I have been talking about?
You are so far off course here, as to be just plain silly. I am not a
"big banger&qu
John wrote:
Believe in God's word is fundy
code for believe as I do.
After all this time, you still don't understand. If it is code for
anything, it is: line up with my understanding of God's Word here, or show
me what the true understanding of God's Word is and help me to line up with
it.
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:29
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
So which fundamentalist version of creation do you support.
That A E were spirit people. A 6000 year
: March 23, 2006 14:29
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
John wrote:
Believe in God's word is fundy
code for believe as I do.
After all this time, you still don't understand. If it is code for
anything, it is: line up with my understanding of God's Word here, or
show
me
"I don't understand your point." = "Are you mocking
the concept I do understand?"
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
-
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:47
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articlesaction="">
Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for Their For
Thanks for that compliment (?), David. BTW, I'm not
embarrassed to read them either.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Actually
, it infects the whole group. So I prefer the concept of
believing in fundamental Christianity but not believing in fundamentalism.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 14:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
To believe fundamental Christianity means to accept fundamental tenets of
Christianity. To believe fundamentalism means to embrace a sect of
Christianity which hammers on the fundamentals. What if that ism
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
I will give it a read, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David Miller wrote:
Have you
22, 2006 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his position. DOUBLE
YIKES!! I know that you will continue to do so. You are truly trapped,
David. You've bound yourself with your own theology (not, as you believe
: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
The CNN report: Asked if creationism should be taught in schools,
Williams
said: I don't think it should, actually. No, no.
So how have I mischaracterized him?
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED
d to come into being? I don't understand your point.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
So which fundament
You have risen to new heights, soon to be appointed
ARCHbishop, John.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 16:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006 16:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David !! Honestly, this is one of the sorriest posts you have ever written. First, an atheist mocks God and I am no atheist.
: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:Is that all you were meaning to say concerning RW? If that's it then,
I'm with RW on this one. I don't think it should be taught in schools
either.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 4:36
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
David !! Honestly, this is one of the sorriest posts you have
ever written. First, an atheist mocks God and I am no atheist.
Secondly
d-east and, elsewhere.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 23, 2006 07:50 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismAGAIN you show your Short Comprehension I am NOT a REFORMED CATHOLIC. wrong slot Lance, better take it to
WE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto CesearUnless of course you are swayed by the Reconstructionists.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:What in the hell do you think I have been talking about? You are so far
http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/a/r/aruwashd.htm Have you been to Jesus for the cleansing power?Are you washed in the blood of the Lamb?Are you fully trusting in His grace this hour?Are you washed in the blood of the Lamb? Refrain Are you washed in the blood,In the soul cleansing blood of the
So I prefer the concept of believing in fundamental Christianity but not believing in fundamentalism.And that is whileI prefer to believe the Special Revelation of God himself, I do not have a POPE or Potentate or Presbytery. I simply believe the revelation in the Book. JN 17:17 "Thy word IS
Weee, yeaahh. And your point?
-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB
Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto Cesear
Unless of course you are swayed by the
: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
The CNN report: Asked if creationism should be taught in schools,
Williams
said: I don't think it should, actually. No, no.
So how have I mischaracterized him?
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED
My goodness, jd. What DO you believe
about Genesis??? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006
3:36 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams
on Creationism
You have risen to new heights, soon to be appointed
ARCHbishop, John.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 23, 2006
16:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Fw: Williams
roots of our public education system (before the
lefties took over?) izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006
5:39 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
WE DON'T
ea about the Christian roots of our public education system (before the
lefties took over?) izzyFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:39 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creatio
l Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:32 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism David:Is that all you were meaning to say concerning RW? If that's it then, I'm wi
s??? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:36 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David !! Honestly, this is one of the sorriest posts you
23, 2006 5:39 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
WE DON'T NEED TO BE IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM IF WE ARE DOING OUR JOB
Our Job is NOT the school system or Politics, render unto Cesear
Unless of course you are swayed by the Reconstructioni
Anyone who has a problem with it. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 9:21
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Whom do you ask the guys who think DM
, March 21, 2006 9:21 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on CreationismWhom do you ask the guys who think DM Judy are Fundies?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? iz-Original
Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Yup is right, but how does he get from this thought to the idea that
creationism should not be considered in schools? I hate it when
theologians
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 21, 2006 15:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
John wrote:
The world in which we live would reject
any mention of God in the evolutionary process,
IMO. But creationism in the schools?
Could
this or that you
would defend this Bishop. Deception is the only word for it.
David Miller
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:27
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw
Iz:Fundamental Christianity is that which John believes. FundamentalISM
ought not be believed by anyone.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 21, 2006 21:48
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
There is room for us to have different perspectives about how God
created, but none of us should disagree with the notion that God is the
Creator. To suggest that schools not teach even the possibility that God
is the Creator is so
non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG>Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Yup is right, but how does he get from th
David Miller wrote:
I hate it when theologians are embarrassed
of giving glory to the Creator in school.
Lance wrote:
You do KNOW, do you not David, that
that's NOT the source of his embarrassment?
Rowan Williams is not embarrassed concerning
our Lord ANYWHERE. He, not unlike many,
are
22, 2006 08:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David Miller wrote:
I hate it when theologians are embarrassed
of giving glory to the Creator in school.
Lance wrote:
You do KNOW, do you not David, that
that's NOT the source of his embarrassment?
Rowan Williams
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David:
I'll take a pass on the ad-homs in your post as they simply illustrate what
I've said concerning you
and his teaching on both science theology? How is it that one
could not appreciate your scholarship on this?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 09:45
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Lance wrote:
If Williams is a 'liberal loonie' then
you are a 'sectarian loonie' , David.
I'm sectarian only in the sense that the holy and the profane ought to be
separate. I am not sectarian within the group of those who have submitted
unto Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
Lance
and, what you now do to others.Yikes! Yikes! Yikes (that'd be triple yikes)
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 10:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Lance wrote:
If Williams is a 'liberal
Lance wrote:
Fundamental Christianity is [fine]...
FundamentalISM ought not be
believed by anyone.
FWIW: I can appreciate this distinction Lance makes.
David Miller
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.
Lance wrote:
One's time would be better spent reading
some noteworthy novelists than noteworthy
creationists. Lift up Jesus and, creationISM,
will fall away as it should.
I can't say that I agree with you here. Have you read Creation's Tiny
Mystery, by Robert Gentry?
David Miller
No, I've not but, what would I learn were I to do so, David?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 10:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Lance wrote:
One's time would be better spent
David Miller wrote:
Have you read Creation's Tiny
Mystery, by Robert Gentry?
Lance wrote:
No, I've not but, what would I learn
were I to do so, David?
I'm glad you asked.
There are several things you would learn:
1. You would learn about the evidence for polonium halos indicating that
It is a shame we will not be able to finish this thread, I suppose, but I must say something here -- the conflict (speaking for myself) is not between science and religion. It is between religion and fundamentalism (radical fundamentalism, if you will.) Knowing that the first step will not be
Only in your hair-splitting mentality. iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:03 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Iz:Fundamental Christianity
So?
There isn't a single fiew of the whole church that is
agreed upon
by the whole church either. What does that
prove? judyt
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:27:56 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I do. I know
this --
there isn't a single view of
Let me get this straight JD.
By Rad Fundies you are talking about people who believe
Genesis as it is
written - Right??
PS What is wrong with the Carroll Dean's and the Pat
Robertsons of this
world? You may have to eat those words one day because
both are busy
about what they believe God
The problem is when any belief held by a fundamental Christian is labeled
Fundamentalism. izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:28 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw
: Williams on Creationism
No, I've not but, what would I learn were I to do so, David?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 10:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
Lance wrote:
One's time would
But its so much easier to sit on
ones tuffet and criticize the work of others. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006
1:25 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams
Operative _expression_ 'what they believe God has
called them to do'?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 14:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on
Creationism
Let me get this straight JD
About as much as your husband's patients have learned from his care, Iz.
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 14:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
What would anyone learn from all
Iz:You slipped! David agreed with this 'hair-splitting' as you call it. Do
you wish to apologize to your mentor?
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 14:21
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
I will give it a read, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism
David Miller wrote:
Have you read Creation's Tiny
Mystery, by Robert Gentry
Do you even know what this thread is about, Judy? WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GETS INTO THE CIRRICULUM -- HUH ???
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So?
There isn't a single fiew of the whole church that is agreed upon
by the whole church either.
Do you even know what this thread is about, Judy? WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GOES INTO THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM -- HUH ??!! Be sure to answer with "the right one, John -- duh !!" or will that be Linda's piece of intellectual contribuation for the day?
jd
-- Original message
Paul opposed the intolerant legalists in the church and so will I while, at the same time, writing the words of Romans 14. He is one of my mentors -- I will do the same.
A Rad Fundy is not defined by the words she reads but by the froth of mouth as she "evangelizes" the lost.
If the shoe
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But its so much easier to sit on ones tuffet and criticize the work of others. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy TaylorSent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 1:25 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw
t;To: <TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG>Sent: March 21, 2006 21:48Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism If fundamental Christianity is a problem for you, of what spirit are you? iz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan Sent: Tue
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG> Sent: March 22, 2006 13:44 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism David Miller wrote: Have you read Creation's Tiny Mystery, by Robert Gentry? Lance wrote: No, I've not but, what would I learn were
Well what are you about Lance Muir
Are you doing what God has called someone else to
do?
Are you criticizing what you think someone else is
doing that God didn't tell them to do?
Are you hearing God as to what he wants you to
do?
How do you know you are hearing God since noone can
know
many, are embarrassed over believers turning non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG>Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Yup is
There is something funny about a man that thinks he has such a direct line with God that he is able to discern God's will for another man!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well what are you about Lance Muir Are you doing what God has called someone else to do? Are you criticizing
many, are embarrassed over believers turning non-issues into 'issues'. (i.e. creationISM)- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG>Sent: March 21, 2006 13:12Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Yup is
so that you might see just howwrong you are. (Bonus name: Thomas Weinandy).Go to it guys!- Original Message - From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
<TRUTHTALK@MAIL.INNGLORY.ORG>Sent: March 22, 2006 08:39Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism Da
And what do his other "works" say about him, to you?How do you feel about his taking part in a DRUID worship service?David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lance wrote: If Williams is a 'liberal loonie' then you are a 'sectarian loonie' , David.I'm sectarian only in the sense that the holy and
Then maybe you can flesh it out for the rest of us. I am sure Lance can not/will notI am sure we can see the difference, but just what are the symptoms of that particular ISM? David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lance wrote: Fundamental Christianity is [fine]... FundamentalISM ought not
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articlesaction=""> Polonium Radiohalos: The Model for Their Formation Tested and Verified http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articlesaction="">But being that it is ICR research you may be too embarrassed to read it. ; )
101 - 200 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
