yep--you should
receive the bat from Minnesota soon--as soon as it's turned--let me know when it
arrives what you think, etc.,and i'll cash the check
thank
you!
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:48:27 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
g, did you get my check?
jd
--
Cash the check before it is too late !!!
King of sounds like "save yourself," doesn't it?
Seriously, go ahead and put it in the bank.
yf jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yep--you should receive the bat from Minnesota soon--as soon as it's
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 8:50:58 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the Root and the Offspring of David
yep--you should receive the bat from Minnesota soon--as soon as it's turned--let me know when it arrives what you think,
why
didGodinvestpplwith two ears one
mouth?
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:08:33 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||..you can do that for money [,]
why can't you do it for God:-)
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 9:23:09 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the Root and the Offspring of David
why didGodinvestpplwith two ears one mouth?
cd: Because if we used our mouth correctly we only need one-and hearing
to listen two times
more thantalk
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 21:49:41 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 2/1/2006 9:23:09 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ,
the Root and
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 8:51:36 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the Root and the Offspring of David
I have explained this numerous times, Judy. Reread my post of a few days ago pertaining to the intrinsic vs
cd: Don't let you thoughts drop to the gutters guys-take them into captivity-resist!
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/31/2006 12:00:40 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the Root and the Offspring of David
ifyou're thinkin' of askin' JCs
Judy wrote:
If we can be adopted as sons into the
household of God - why can't God the
Word be adopted into humanity as the
son of man?
The only foundation for our adoption is that Christ became flesh. Without
that, nobody can be adopted into the household of God.
David Miller.
Bill wrote: I believe he was the fruit of
David's genitals according to the flesh, Judy. Do you believe the
same?
Judy replied: No . .
.
Bill then replied: This should clarify any confusion Dean may have had
about being in agreement with [Judy] in regards to Christ being a
Bill you have a Greek gospel because your faith rests
in Gk words .. I wonder, are allGreeks saved??
Jesus Christ is who His Own Word says he is whether or
not orthodoxy agrees and whether you see it or not. Right nowyou are
attempting to validate the pronouncements oforthodoxy which is the
The seed to whom the promises were made is SPIRITUAL SEED Bill and the second Adam is
spiritual also (see 1 Cor 15:45,46). Please don't try to make it something it is
not. Abraham BELIEVED God and it was counted to him for
righteousness. His sperma who thought they all
had it made in the
Oh, yeah, blame it on the Word.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:03
AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the
Root and the Offspring of David
One smiles, not, I trust in derision, Judy. Look
Judy, DM has a 'Geek gospel' but, it is certainly not the case that all 'Geeks'
are saved. So then, just to put your fertile imagination to rest, Judy,
..NO!
'who His Own Word say He is'...MEANING:As I, Judy
Taylor (and, as I David Miller)
He does not have a human father Bill; he was fathered
by the Holy Spirit and the family he was born into is that
of Abraham/David. Why are you so adamant about
what you can not possibly know. He was born holy. David was
not
(see Psalm 51:5) "Behold I was shapen in iniquity and
in sin did my
I believe he was fruit of David's genitals according to the
flesh, Judy. Do you believe the same?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:26
AM
Subject: Re:
No; my belief is that Jesus was fathered in the womb of
Mary by the Holy Spirit
Why is the flesh connection so important to you
Bill?
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:47:02 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe he was fruit of David's genitals according to the
flesh, Judy. Do you
Either Jesus is the Christ of God through the blood line of David or He is nothing at all. You "spiritualize" all references to the genealogy of Christ, making the Old Testament record of no purpose when it comes to the positioning of the Messiah.
It is a shame that you make Him to be something
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal 3:29 which says "And if you belong to Christ, THEN YOU ARE ABRAHAM'S OFFSPRING, heirs according to promise" and ignore the words of 3:16 "Now the promises were spoken to
I hasten to add a word of thanks to Bill for making this a clearly stated fact of scripture.
jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal
If we can be adopted as sons into the household of God
- why can't God the Word be
adopted into humanity as the "son of man?" You
are locked into a position you can not
prove either way JD. How so, when the flesh
profits nothing and the Spirit is what gives life?
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:12:34 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or
worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal 3:29 which
says "And if you belong to Christ, THEN YOU ARE ABRAHAM'S OFFSPRING,
heirs according
Completely bogus, Judy. For starters, you are now arguing that Jesus is the adopted Son of Man. Months ago, I charged that your doctrine would lead to the notion that Jesus is an adopted Son. I was referring to HisEternal Sonship -- little did I know that my prediction would be true as applied to
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:12:34 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal 3:29 which says "And
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:35:08 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Completely bogus, Judy. For starters, you are now
arguing that Jesus is the adopted Son of Man. Months
ago, I charged that your doctrine would lead to the notion that Jesus is
an adopted Son. I was referring to
I have explained this numerous times, Judy. Reread my post of
a few days ago pertaining to the intrinsic vs extrinsic nature of the Atonement
for starters. By the way, thanks for being honest. This should clarify any
confusion Dean may have had about being in agreement with you in regards to
I don't think Dean is as hung up on David's genitals as
you are Bill.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:02:41 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have explained this numerous times, Judy. Reread my post
of a few days ago pertaining to the intrinsic vs extrinsic nature of the
Atonement
DAVEH: H.I wonder if there are any new TT subscribers
today? And if so, I wonder what they might be thinking after reading
some of our posts! :-[
Judy Taylor wrote:
I don't think Dean is as hung up on
David's genitals as you are Bill.
--
~~~
Dave
I don't think Dean is as hung up on David's genitals as
you are Bill.
It's not my hang up, Judy, but yours. I am simply thrusting
home the meaningLuke's words in regards to Christ's humanity.
osphuos
[UBS] reproductive organs (descendant Ac 2.30).
[Friberg] (2) Hebraistically,
myth(Joseph's
wife'sparents are alsoJCs human
grandparents)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:42:54 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Jesus was fathered in the womb of Mary
..[but] He does not have
a human father
ifyou're
thinkin' of askin' JCs Momma,pray shedoesn't ask himto handle
it for her
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:15:54 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..I wonder what[ppl] might be thinking after reading ..
I don't think Dean is as hung up on David's genitals
as you are Bill.
g, did you get my check?
jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ifyou're thinkin' of askin' JCs Momma,pray shedoesn't ask himto handle it for her
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:15:54 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..I wonder what[ppl] might be
:-)
-- Original message -- From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] DAVEH: H.I wonder if there are any new TT subscribers today? And if so, I wonder what they might be thinking after reading some of our posts! :-[ Judy Taylor wrote:
I don't think Dean is
"I am theRhiza
('Root' or 'Life-source')and the
Genos (from which we get'gene' and 'genome,'hence
'Offspring') of David."
Indeed, Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man -- he
isboth the Maker and the receiver of David's "genetic" material. Likewise,
"Before Abraham was I AM," and "Now
34 matches
Mail list logo
