al Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT Double
Standard
No Lance, I wouldn't acknowledge this to be the
case because
icizing the'deceived' as you put it, Judy. The difficulty is that some
who are, in reality deceived, believe themselves to be 'in the truth' do
they not?
From: Judy
Taylor
Meaning that all evangelism and preaching the
gospel should
truth.You are forever denigrating persons both on and
off TT. You call it speaking the truth when so doing.
From: Judy Taylor
Oh, here is one I missed,
1. Yes most of the time I find your writings to be
unclear rather than plain Lance
2. No I don't imply anything, I fi
the latter.
From: Judy Taylor
How ironic Lance; you are constantly asking me
these kinds of questions.
So why are they suspect when they come your
way?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:10:33 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Is this a trick que
it contain a 'spiritual component'? I opt for
the latter.
From: Judy Taylor
How ironic Lance; you are constantly asking me
these kinds of questions.
So why are they suspect when they come your
way?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:10:33 -0500 "Lance Muir&qu
Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An evil accusation you say, Judy? Why don't you
research your comments on Polanyi, Torrance, Barth et al?
From: Judy Taylor
You are reading with the help of the powers of
darkness Lance. I do not denigrate people. This is an
Who is trying to kill you, Blaine, or anyone else JD.
Don't make this into something it's not. The men Jesus was
speaking to were going to stone the adultress to death
but noone said a word about the man and the Law said they
were both to be stoned. As for TT. Mormon
handshakes and sacred
Dec 2005 16:00:15 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. . . but noone said a word about the man and the
Law said they were both to be stoned.
It is not I who speculates, Judy.
Bill
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No that's not it at all Bill
Woul
True believers hear the voice of the Spirit when they
miss it and they go to the throne of grace
to make things right. God doesn't use Nathans
anymore and David only missed it in a big way
once, maybe twice. It is all going to be "shouted
from the housetops" anyway and God knows.
so we don't
Might as well admit it Blaine - you Mormon boys
have been sprung. You've got yourselves in a mess over this
one.
This is exactly what happened with my little
friend in Newfoundland Canada. Two good looking Mormon Missionaries had
her and her friend snowed. They said
they were born again
According to your scale of measure Terry - and assuming
you know everything there is to know about the one you are judging. However,
only God actually sees and knows the heart and you are judging by how it appears
outwardly ... Jesus himself would not have appeared too humble on the day He
and
wonderfully
made.
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:14:35 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Could you explain what you mean by self rejection?Judy Taylor
wrote:
Hi Terry,
I don't know that any of us would say that they are
"self satisfied" in fact not
nd
evil?Judy Taylor wrote:
God's wisdom is a tree of life JD
AE rejected it in favor of the tree of
death
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:38:42 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, you decided to ignore my comment about the Tree of
Life?Adam an
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:44:56 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would expect Satan to teach his people to shun the cross...it is the
very instrument of his defeat.DAVEH: Really? As
I see it, the cross was the most successful tool Satan could devise to torture
and kill
be 'Spirit-Inspired' (Does Scripture have ONE MEANING? Are
both you and David always in possession of that ONE MEANING?)
From:
Judy
Taylor
My, my Lance, you've just run right off here into
another subject entirely - Let's stick with the one at hand and see
what
rily yours.
No but, peoplewill
continue to do so. Yes
unequivocally!
From: Judy Taylor
How many meanings do you think it has
Lance?
Do you think it should be chameleon like for ppl to
form it into whatever shape fits their doctrinal demands?
Or should we seek the Lor
Are both you and David always in possession of that ONE
MEANING?)
From: Judy Taylor
My, my Lance,
you've just run right off here into another subject entirely - Let's stick
with the one at hand and see what God has to say about it ... Those
prophets are messing with
e you JD, I'd go back to Barth. He is the one
with all the answers, along with TFT, Polyani,
etc... Why
go back when I am doing so good with the biblical text ??!!
I will await your answers. Still
waiting.
jd
-Original Mess
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:05:10 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, you didn't answer the question.
The gentile in Romans 2 IS NOT a
regeneratedindividual.
How do we know this?This is a person who
has never heard the preaching of the law of God
(Paul contrasts hearing with doing in
Is this fellow talking to himself or
what? Maybe he and Gary are in cahoots.
He asks the question and then he answers
himself ... only Gary doesn't stop at one answer
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:59:14 +1100 "Andrew C. Bain" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Question : "Who can declare what are
Why is it necessary to understand what Barth is about
JD?
Because simple folk like you are busy
misunderstanding what Barth is about, JT.
OK JD, I should have known better; since Barth
is your forte - I leave him to you. I don't care what
he
was about or what he said or didn't say;
Blaine
writes: The Book of Mormon is the word of
God
I'm sure you
know already that I don't buy that Blaine; God's Words never contradict
themselves, he is not confused.
Thanks for your
concern but to the contraryI am content, I enjoy my life, God has always
been faithful so I'm not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Judy
Taylor
I don't see His parables as every day
stuff - especially not when he told His disciples
that
he spoke in parables so that some
would not see - rather than to make it easy for the
regular
run o
My, my Lance, you've just run right off here into
another subject entirely - Let's stick with the one at hand and see
what
God has to say about it ... Those prophets are
messing with your head.
1 Cor2:14 Juxtaposes the two kinds of
wisdom - which are natural/worldly and spiritual or
I am not of Barth and neither am I of Dakes
jt
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:59:50 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what I want to know is what Jesus is
saying (present tense)
Read Barth (instead of Dakes)
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is it necessary
How amazing - This situation completely reverses
everything
Woe until them that call evil
goodandgoodevil; that put darkness for light, and light for
darkness
that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!! (Isa
5:20)
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:34:04 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL
are cultish in your doctrine and
blind to any possibility of
change. That is NOT the
leadership of the Spirit.
If I were you JD, I'd go back to Barth. He is the one
with all the answers, along with TFT, Polyani, etc...
I will await your answers.
jd
] writes:
God hasn't redeemed the whole world
. ??
!-Original
Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun,
11 Dec 2005 03:59:04 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] CSL comparable
Who is it (I believe JD and Blaine) who are constantly
telling me to lighten up - or accusing me
of having no joy. Look at this bunch - God's
people and I'd say they had some joy .. but it didn't
help them any. I guess God must not believe in
'once saved, always saved'
"therefore my
Interesting comments from CSL's stepson - contradicting
the voice of scripture which says loving the brethren
is how we know we are "in Him" and His Spirit is in
us. The professing church may not be as it should at any
given time but where else
does one go to findbrethren?
Did anyone see
Perry in this case obtuse would probably be an
improvement
I for one find the "abstruseness" since he likes that
wordto be quite wearying.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:15:00 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: I believe you mean to use the word ABSTRUSE instead of OBTUSE do
you not,
wouldn't, Judy. You are in deep doodoo without anyone,
including Canadians, keeping 'tabs', as you put
it.
From: Judy
.
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:44:07 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You speak as if the Holy Sprit
indwelling and the "..law written on
their hearts" are two different things.
What exactly do you mean when you, Judy Taylor, speak of the law
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:26:28 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Me again.JD
writes: You speak as if the Holy Sprit indwelling and the "..law written on
their hearts" are two different things. What exactly do you mean
when you, Judy Taylor, speak of the law writt
I have it and have yet to figure out what it is
excellent for I'd put it on the same level as "Dead Sea
Scrolls"
and "Dead Sea Scroll Bibles"
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:17:04 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I SELL this book. It's excellent!
- Original Message
MuirNo you wouldn't, Judy. You are in
deep doodoo without anyone, including Canadians, keeping 'tabs', as you put
it.
From: Judy
Taylor
Sure glad you are keeping up with
our economy Lance. Don't know what we
would do if we didn't have
Why do you call them "the secular allegory of His day?"
Iz
Wasn't He born under the Law into a
theocracy?
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:37:29 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jesus used the
secular allegory of His day; called parables. iz
From:
[EMAIL
od spoke through him and, said exactly
that. You may be surprised to know just how
dependent your country is on Canada. It is NOT JUST the
other way 'round. Most yanks are sufficiently
insular to know nothing of the rest of the world
(including their neighbour)
From: Judy T
amily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I use the word
secular to denote everyday stuff vs. religious stuff.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Judy
Taylor
Why do you call them "the secular
allegory of His day?" Iz
Interpretation please... Gary is speaking in
tongues - Or could it be Dylanspeak??
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:57:02 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..'bout a 50
megaton blast, baby
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:47:33 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thewestern sun
setnearhiroshima
JD your dylexia has kicked in again. We who are
born through procreation are created in the "image" of the
first Adam. They were here first already and
the tree of life is what they were encouraged toeat from. to
say they were walking in death right then is pure
unwarranted speculation;
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:45:44 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
being over protective through fear is one
thingDAVEH: That seems to be a tactic of some
Christians. For instance, the whole commonly believed scenario about
hell being a literal punitive torturous form of
what you believe
about it. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Let me get this straight - you are saying that the
Christians have all been deceived about why the fall happened
and you Mormons are the only ones who know the facts
of the matter?? Am I hearing correctly??Judy Taylor
What is the evidence?
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 04:20:21 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, there is evidence that Adam and Eve were created just like
us -- which includes the fact that they were created
"mortal,"
ial to die
in the absence of the sustenance supplied by the tree of life: "'And
now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and
live forever' -- so the LORD God banished him from the Garden . .
."
Bill
From: Judy Taylor
JD you
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:01:44 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Judy Taylor
So they were created one of two ways. They
were either eternal with the ability to fall through disobedience -
OR they were created like us which is mortal
Blaine do you read the Bible?
It was not a coveted sister Cain was jealous of - why
not go back and refresh .[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think Eve had a passal of children, they just didn't make headlines
like Cain. Cain married his sister, according to one
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:57:00 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Judy Taylor
So they
were created one of two ways. They were either eternal with the
ability to fall through disobedience - OR they were
created lik
Yeah! Innocence turned to lust and caring
and love turned into pride, selfishness, and shame.
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:52:03 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 12/8/2005 10:34:55 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, there is evidence that
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:33:40 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, there is evidence that Adam and Eve were created just like us -- which includes the fact that
they were created
"mortal," hence, the The Tree of Life , in the
garden. jd
Above is the strawman that needs
I thought the same thing - this looks like what we used
to call in Australia a golliwog. jt
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:53:46 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
temple stone!I had kinda pictured God in my mind as having a little different
hair do.
When a woman wears leather clothing, . A man's
heart beats quicker, his throat gets dry, he goes weak in the knees,
and he begins to think irrationally. Ever wonder why? Because she
smells like a new truck.
D]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:57:00 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] New
Subject-AE
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
. What do you suppose would
be the result of eating from such fruit? I say "continued
life." jd From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:33:40 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Also, there is evidence that Adam and Eve were created ju
uot; is the need for community than you can
for "holy and eternal" jd
Oh I know JD - here we
go again with the "procession and the perichoresis - and the trinity all
dancing with each other" Some things never change.
From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@ju
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:44:07 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You speak as if the Holy Sprit indwelling and the "..law written on their
hearts" are two different things.
What exactly do you mean when you, Judy Taylor, speak of the law
written on
I sure don't wonder at this Christine,
Whenever you post JD makes allusions to your age, like
he is the old man full of wisdom and you are
just the novice who still has to learn; do you
sometimes feel like you are being diss'd?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:11:05 -0800 (PST) Christine Miller [EMAIL
rather than for Him. judyt
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:36:28 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To test them
DaveHDAVEH: ??? Do you not think God
knew their faith, Judy? Why do you think God would need to test them,
since he created themknowing they would transgress?Judy Taylor
Lance my goodness, this looks more like a morning rant
than morning musings ... sigh!
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:30:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forever rail against the graciousness of this selfsame
God?
Who is railing? Taking His Own Words seriously
is hardly
Lance why don't you trying employing the "words of God"
with the WORD OF GOD
sometime and give us an example of the "real thing" IYO
of course. jt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:41:25 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IFF one (mis)cites Scripture with the intention
of speaking for
ngely) she will
then be spoken to more frequently as Christine and, not David's daughter. (I'd
mention you mom's name but, don't know it).
fn:Christine: Are you at the University of
Florida? Do you know of Andrea Sterk? (professor)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Yes Lance, I do appreciate your concern
But I have yet to consign the first person to hell -
it's all in your too vivid imagination.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:19:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your DISCERNMENT ON THIS MATTER (who knows, maybe
a few other matters also) is
ea Sterk? (professor)
From: Judy
Taylor
I sure don't wonder at this
Christine,
Whenever you post JD makes allusions to your
age, like he is the old man full of wisdom and you are
just the novice who still has to learn; do yo
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:44:00 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy said'For the record, I don't believe that C. S. Lewis
actually knew the Lord'
Lance, having made an incorrect leap in logic,due to a
belief that Judy believed that persons who die while not knowing the
s to what I personally believe.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:11:05 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WATCH BELOW AS JUDY ASSISTS LANCE IN THE ART OF INTERPRETATION
OK Judy! Having painted yourself in a corner,
just make yourself comfortable. I'll watch your posts in future for use o
Are you up to being able to separate the holy from the
profane yourself Lance?
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:17:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Judy Taylor: He (God) says that only
those who know how to separate the holy from the profane can be his
m
Now, back to the matter at hand; IFF you are
wrong concerning JRRT CSL (according to some on TT) then, what are we to
think concerning that which we read of you hereafter?
From: Judy Taylor
Are you up to being able to separate the holy from
the profane your
OK - You go first
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:32:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are the PERSONS on TT suggesting that that which
they say is not embodied truth? J
ust say so so that we may factor that in when
reading you.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and
elves from his
Promises. The ones who make it are those who do His will and
who
speak as the "oracles of God"
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December
Dec 2005 07:45:18 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy: You made it YOUR problem when you stated
that he did not know the Lord.
(I don't think you even employed an IMO). Why
not, at the very least, give us an "IMO'?
From: Judy Taylor
That is
...
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:03:56 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lance I don't make your opinions my problem so why is
what I write your problem?
You won't ever have to answer to anyone for it.
I am responsible for what I speak/write.
Why arn't you just as concerned about
Are Kevin and Judy chasing them down to behead them or
burn them at the stake taking away their
opportunity to repent, Lord willing? The latter
(as you call them) do not argue with orthodoxy as they
are part of it but neither do they sanctify the Lord in
their hearts which is apparent by the
and
Kevin have this down to an art form !!
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK - You go first
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:32:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Are the PERSONS on TT suggesting that that
which they say is not embo
going to Heaven?
How is this different from OT days
Yes we now have God's Law written on our hearts ???
jd
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05
And of course me too!! judyt
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:26:21 -0800 (PST) Christine Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD wrote:You have allies on this forum but no real
brethren I consider Kevin a dear brother and a man of God. You do not
speak for me on this, JD. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Traditions have replaced the Word of God
...
People whose hearts are set on the flesh nature need a
physical tangible God ...
Today this need is fulfilled through a form of
godliness manifested by many religious organizations and doctrinal structures
...
These like the golden calf, have
Amen Christine!! Agreed ...
Back in the 1960's misguided soul that I was, I
waslooking for truth in all the wrong places and as a mother
of
two young daughters found myself with a friend in her
rcc church on Sundays (while living in the Bible Belt no less).
Betty Friedan's book The Feminine
If you want to look like Lewis Tolkien read them -
If you want to look like Jesus - Selah!! Let them "humanize" you or trust
Jesus to send the Promise and make you part of a "New Creation" in
Him.
C.S. Lewis, the Sneaky PaganThe author of A Field Guide to Narnia says
Lewis wove
Forget it Lance, I've been there and it's a one way
street to nowhere big waste of time.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:27:01 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have either of you examined the role of your
churches vis a vis that horrid 'feminism'?
Let me hear from either of
The difference is in the way we read. You do not
respect/revere me in the way you do your
favorite theologians and authors and that makes all the
difference. They are your teachers...
and they are who you will become like
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:55:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't recall pronouncing anything at all having to do
with evangelism...
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:57:12 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy pronounces relational evangelism with feminists A WASTE OF TIME!
Want to add anyone else to the list?
judyt
He that says "I know
Don't hold her in less esteem because of her age.
Timothy was a pastor wasn't he? I see it the same
way she does and I have children who are older than 20
something. You don't understand her POV JD
Kevin is for the Truth. How can you argue with
that???
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:03:03 -0500
You are at least being honest about this JD - Excellent
trait .
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:13:33 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forget it Lance, I've been there and it's a one way
street to nowhere
big waste of time. = "I haven't a clue."
jdFrom: Judy Tay
To test them DaveH. Faith is ALWAYS
tested.
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:24:10 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He did not plan for them to fall.DAVEH: If that is
so, then why do you think he placed the tree of knowledge of good and evil in
the Garden of Eden, Terry? Rather than
So where are the grounds for your accusation - where
does itcome from?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:24:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sure you don't!
From: Judy Taylor
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance not
having anything to contribute is back
-0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With great ease and conviction of heart.Christine is a
kid . Timothy was discipled by Paul.
:-) jdFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't hold her in less esteem because of her
age. Timothy was a pastor wasn't he? I see it the
same
D]
writes:
I'm sure you don't!
From: Judy Taylor
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance not
having anything to contribute is back to his old word games
I don't recall pronouncing anything at all having
to do with evangelism...
On Wed, 7 Dec
befriended, listened to and,
prayed with. (Please, no signs!)
From: Judy Taylor
So where are the grounds for your accusation -
where does itcome from?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:24:30 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I'm sure you do
You got the subject like right this time Lance.
Put down has become your forte
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:49:35 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed Judy!! Anyone old enough to recall Edgar Bergen
Charley McCarthy?
From: Judy Taylor
Christine
I didn't see Christine putting anyone down. Who
exactly do you reference?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:23:43 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why go to all that bother when you can just join
Christine in 'putting them down'? Duh!
From: Judy Taylor
will find
herself stunted. I know of many who , after coming to the
Lord, have refused their own experienceswith retardation as a their
finale. Thank God we don't have to be right. jdFrom: Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christine is mature spiritually whatever her age
, the confusion of
gender roles, the rise of moral relativism and humanism, the rise of sexual
promescuity, etc.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:38:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Feminists! Don't you read what she
writes?
From: Judy Taylor
I didn't see Christine putting a
Here is one review from Amazon:
Every Christian I've ever heard or read has condemned
Judas to hell...until Anderson. Anderson's examination of both the
Biblical story of Judas and Jesus' teaching on forgiveness demonstrate two
things. Christians should have undying hope for everyone, even
The more I read about this fellow
the more alarming it becomes. Of course none of it would matter to
Lance,
but there is much more mixture
than I had previously suspected.
C. S. Lewis SuperstarHow a reserved British intellectual with a checkered pedigree
became a rock star for
for Christianity?
Christians get so EXCITED about a Movie, do they get so excited about
Jesus?
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The more I read about this
fellow the more alarming it becomes. Of course none of it would matter to
Lance,
but there is much more
that they would definitely transgress, or do you
think there was a possibility that they would not transgress?Judy
Taylor wrote:
You have brought this up in the past on TT DaveH
but it didn't last long because there is no place to go with
it.
By definition all anyone could
So, is Anderson's thesis that because Jesus put up with
a false disciple that the wheat should be chummy
with all the tares which would be contradictory to
Kevin's scriptural evidence for separation/sanctification.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:00:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh now that makes a bit more sense - since so much
other nonsense comes out of that place.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 04:01:45 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Consider the source.
Fuller Theo.Lance Muir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two excellent books
Yes, Jesus was longsuffering with him all along because
He knew but let him hold the purse anyway.
Now that's faith.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 04:06:58 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jesus Loved him but He did not win
him.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Judy says 'SINCE SO MUCH OTHER NONSENSE COMES OUT OF
THAT PLACE (FULLER SEMINARY)
I don't read novels; we are cautioned to guard our
hearts with all diligence - As for Fuller, part of their teaching
staff
did not believe in the inerrance of scripture - also
this is where Wagner gave the
801 - 900 of 4567 matches
Mail list logo
