[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2360.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Changes committed at r665992. Changed wire build so that autowire doesn't
Dear root,
Please create an id for Scott Kurz on the Tuscany project
Preferred userid:scottkurz
Full name: Scott Kurz
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
Votes:
tuscany-private, June 9,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2242:
Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam
Incorrent port name in wsdlElement leads
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2368:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Seaprate the Policy calculation phase from the Wire build phase in
Hi Ant,
Thanks for your investigation on this.
I m getting exception with WebSphere JMS client with a Sun JDK...
below is the stacktrace for it...
javax.naming.NamingException: Failed to initialize the ORB [Root exception
is java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sun.corba.se.impl.orb.ORBImpl]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603793#action_12603793
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2242:
--
Hi Simon,
I have a fix for
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What distro Zips are we building and
what do they contain?
I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
- smaller packages
- easier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2267:
Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam
Raise a warning if both reference target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603797#action_12603797
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2267:
--
Hi Simon,
I just wanted to
I've been able to recreate this problem by using a non-IBM JRE with the
WebSphere JMS client. Turns out the Tuscany JMS binding needs to a special
property added to the JNDI initial context environment when NOT running on
an IBM JRE. I've updated the binding-jms code to do this and it works ok now
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to keep updating the trunk pom
version. And this would probably make everybody
I need to submit our ASF board report by next Monday. I've created a wiki
page - http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/June+2008 -
please add anything you want mentioned.
...ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603810#action_12603810
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2267:
-
I think this should apply to all bindings.
I'd like to get this voted on and released but nervous to start that after
Kelvin had trouble getting the emf dependencies, could any one else try
building the tag and seeing if it works or not for them -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1.1-RC2/-
its a small
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2368.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Change committed at r666037
Seaprate the Policy calculation phase from the
Mike Edwards wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
there
has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels
like the
right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the
last
couple of months there are
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
How about 1.5-SNAPSHOT ? This would probably give us some room to have
couple releases without the necessity to
I just committed r666041 which removes the copied processListService()
code from TuscanyListingAgent, and instead uses an override of
extractServiceName() to get the necessary Tuscany-specific behaviour.
This was needed because the TuscanyListingAgent.processListService()
code was older than the
Building in windows, with a clean repo :
Missing:
--
1) org.eclipse.emf:common:jar:2.2.3
Try downloading the file manually from the project website.
Then, install it using the command:
mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.eclipse.emf
-DartifactId=common -Dversion=2.2.3
I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy
testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with
the composite service bindings that promote them. Looking at the
BaseWireBuilderImpl code there is a method called
reconcileReferenceBindings() that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603836#action_12603836
]
Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-2325:
--
Is there any simple way to reproduce
The SCA Web Service binding spec says that a WSDL document should
be generated for a service that uses binding.ws. This applies
whether or not the binding.ws element specifies an existing
WSDL document. If the binding.ws element specifies an existing
WSDL document, the generated WSDL document
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Edwards wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then
there
has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels like
the
right time to do a 1.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603844#action_12603844
]
Daniel Stucky commented on TUSCANY-2343:
Hi Rajini,
I finally managed to get the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy
testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with
the composite service bindings that promote them. Looking at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2267:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2267.patch
Raise a warning if both reference target and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603856#action_12603856
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-2371:
--
Completed: At revision:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What distro Zips are we building and
what do they contain?
I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
- smaller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated TUSCANY-2378:
-
Description:
Databinding tests for generics, parameterized and polymorphic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603891#action_12603891
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on TUSCANY-2378:
--
Added test for polymorphic
As explained in my previous post, after introducing a fix as shown below
Intent resolvedRequiredIntent = resolver.resolveModel(Intent.class,
requiredIntent);
if (!resolvedRequiredIntent.isUnresolved()) {
requiredIntents.add(resolvedRequiredIntent);
for the unreachable code, noticed that not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603900#action_12603900
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-2109:
-
Based on where our discussion ended up here:
I think it's a problem in the test case. The resolve() cannot work with
http://abc (which abc is treated as a host name). I changed it to
http://abc/, then it works well.
You can simply create a test case using URIs only without Tuscany in the
picture.
Thanks,
Raymond
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam reassigned TUSCANY-2379:
Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam
CompositeProcessor.java is calling
Hi Raymond,
Whether or not resolve() works with http://abc, I have a URI created as
URI.create(http://abc;).resolve(xyz) and java does not complain about
this URI object . The current problem can be restated that this URI object
can not be passed in an array of URI objects back and forth between
Hi,
Here is a simple test case to prove my point:
public class URITestCase {
@Test
public void testURI() {
URI uri = URI.create(http://abc;);
URI uri1 = uri.resolve(uri);
URI uri2 = URI.create(http://abcxyz;);
Assert.assertEquals(uri1, uri2);
}
}
The Assert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2377.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Test case patch applied and the problem is fixed.
problem reading
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What distro Zips are we building
and
what do they contain?
I think we could improve our distro scheme to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2229:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
Got WARNING if @Context is used to annotate a setter method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603932#action_12603932
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2229:
---
Hi,
This is a result of declaring the two
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What distro Zips are we
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What distro Zips are we
Raymond,
The comment junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:http://abcuri
but was:http://abcuri I had in @Ignore in the testcase code may have lead
to some confusion. I agree that uri1.equals(uri2) is not same as
uri1.toString().equals(uri2.toString()). The issue I am trying to bring
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
[snip]
Good requirement, but I don't think that the current manifest +
tuscany-all JAR solution is a good one (for example it mixes APIs and
internals in the same JAR, doesn't work well with IDEs, works only for one
big distro, requires
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking at TUSCANY-2352 (which I raised when I was doing some policy
testing). The issue is that promoted service bindings aren't augmented with
Simon Laws wrote:
...
I've created an itest (late-reference-resolution) to show how late
resolution could be done using endpoint resolvers.
...
I've spent some time looking at that test and the following classes:
Endpoint
EndpointFactory
Endpoint
EndpointResolver
EndpointResolverFactory
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
[snip]
Good requirement, but I don't think that the current manifest +
tuscany-all JAR solution is a good one (for example it mixes APIs and
internals in the same JAR, doesn't work well with IDEs, works only for
one big
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603975#action_12603975
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2331:
---
I got a diferent exception. It looks like
What I pointed out is the following:
URI.createURI(http//abc).resolve(uri) (toString()==http://abcuri;)
creates a non-equal instance of URI.createURI(http://abcuri;). By the
javadoc of URI, this is violating the rules:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URI.html
Identities
For
Modular distribution structure
--
Key: TUSCANY-2380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2380
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Components: Build System
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker closed TUSCANY-2331.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Got expection where the wsdl defines an operation without input
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2331:
Attachment: BServiceDan.wsdl
I am no WSDL expert, but it seems to be a not valid WSDL file to
Detect extensions installed in a Tuscany distribution
-
Key: TUSCANY-2381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2381
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-181:
---
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Wish)
Need a command line tool and maven2
Hi,
There are two specifications in these areas.
1) Java2IDL: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/08-01-14.pdf
2) IDL2Java: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/08-01-11.pdf
Let's try to use a few scenarios to help us understand what rules should be
applied.
Case A: There is an existing CORBA service
Endpoint model changes
---
Key: TUSCANY-2382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2382
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Components: Build System
Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-2382:
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Endpoint model changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604050#action_12604050
]
Rajini Sivaram commented on TUSCANY-2343:
-
Daniel,
Do you have a date that you
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I'd like to discuss the following: What distro Zips are we building
and what do they contain?
I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
- smaller packages
- easier for people to find what they need
I was thinking
Mike Edwards wrote:
...
Are people interested in exploring these ideas?
Jean-Sebastien,
I'll start with the last question first: YES.
But I'd next like to step back from what I can see is developing into a
somewhat active debate (to use a neutral euphemism)
:)
and investigate
the big
Cannot define component property with Component Type File
-
Key: TUSCANY-2383
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2383
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604079#action_12604079
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2323:
-
This problem is caused by Tuscany not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Nash reassigned TUSCANY-2323:
---
Assignee: Simon Nash
Error generating WSDL when the original wsdl file used to specify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604081#action_12604081
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2323:
-
I checked in r666390 which fixes the symptoms
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
[snip]
Good requirement, but I don't think that the current manifest +
tuscany-all JAR solution is a good one (for example it mixes APIs and
internals in the same
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Good debate here, but let's be clear about the big picture before the
details swamp the debate.
Big +1 to that, i really hope we can some consensus on what the
distributions and runtimes should look like before we
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I pointed out is the following:
URI.createURI(http//abc).resolve(uri) (toString()==http://abcuri;)
creates a non-equal instance of URI.createURI(http://abcuri;). By the
javadoc of URI, this is violating the rules:
Hi All,
I can now run JMS client successfully with latest binding.jms, but you need
to confirm following with WAS 6 before testing it.. this was done with the
help of Ant...
This investigation done on sample sample-helloworld-jms-webapp
1) see the link
71 matches
Mail list logo
