Hello,
I use Tuscany runtime in a web application (see my previous post), I
need to create several composite applications in the same war file (So I
have 2 composite file and 2 wsdl files). These composite applications
use te bind.ws extension to be exposed as Web Service. I already
generate
Hello,
I use Tuscany runtime in a web application (see my previous post), I
need to create several composite applications in the same war file (So I
have 2 composite file and 2 wsdl files). These composite applications
use te bind.ws extension to be exposed as Web Service. I already
generate
On 7/2/07, Jean-Marc Taillant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I use Tuscany runtime in a web application (see my previous post), I
need to create several composite applications in the same war file (So I
have 2 composite file and 2 wsdl files). These composite applications
use te bind.ws
Hello,
I use Tuscany runtime in a web application (see my previous post), I
need to create several composite applications in the same war file (So I
have 2 composite file and 2 wsdl files). These composite applications
use te bind.ws extension to be exposed as Web Service. I already
generate
I just checked in another sample which I'd be happy to take feedback on --
[1] (output appended as in my previous posts)
I would like to rearrange the packages of the samples, as I think the
current arrangement is not very helpful to someone trying to explore SDO
(specCodeSnippets,
Hi Kelvin Luciano,
I submitted patches for TUSCANY-1393 TUSCANY-1237 this morning. Please review
these patches and provide feedback at your earliest convenience.
Thanks,
- Ron
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ron, thanks very much for these. I'm just exploring Erich's question on
Tuscany users list and then your patches are the next thing I plan to look
at.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 02/07/07, Ron Gavlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin Luciano,
I submitted patches for TUSCANY-1393 TUSCANY-1237
Hi Erich,
I generated code from your schema and tried the following lines of code,
which executed without failure ...
*public* *void* testErichsProblem() *throws* Exception {
PublicationDataGraph pdg =
ServicesFactory.*INSTANCE*.createPublicationDataGraph();
DataObject dob =
Wonderful.
Thanks,
- Ron
P.S. Have you looked at the SDO build artifacts being generated at
vmbuild.apache.org? Do they look good to you? Will you be using similar
infrastructure to generate your 1.0 Release Candidates?
- Original Message
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Ron,
It's going to be tomorrow morning UK time before I get to your patches.
I'll be using the sdo/distribution project to build the release candidates.
I don't think this gets built by continuum. After running mvn in the
distribution project, the release archives are found in the
The list is archived in about 3 places that I have found, but the one I
find best from a thread view perspective is ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/index.html
Regards, Kelvin.
On 02/07/07, Enric Staromiejski Torregrosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi,
I just got
Kelvin,
As a user, I would like to see a general ample index file that briefly
explains what each sample does rather than the categorization that is
mentioned here since the terms basic, intermediate, etc. are not well
defined and are open to interpretation. Instead I would like to go to a
Posting to tuscany-user list as well to get input.
Any real world scenarios/samples that can be shared by users? It would be
great if we could start building a library of tips and real usage
examples.. a knowledge base.
Thanks
Haleh
On 7/2/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/2/07,
I did not deal with SDA,before, today I tried it, with succeed. And without any
change to pom.xml, and every dependency downloaded well.
May be you try again, from svn, then you get it.
Ron Gavlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I am building both from trunk. If I change the das-rdb pom by
Could this be related to the issue we found during the DAS beta1
review and described under the following JIRA [1]. This has been fixed
in trunk under revision #552624.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1401
On 7/2/07, shaoguang geng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not deal with
Now that we are going to have a DAS release out, I'd like to plan to
have implementation.das and implementation.data available for the next
release.
I also like to have some improvements to the Contribution Services,
such as import/export and other scenarios that have been described on
the list
We found an issue [1] where, in some cases, incompatible code was
being generated for the DAS config model if you had a previous
tuscany-sdo-plugin available in your local maven repo. I have fixed
this in trunk under revision #552624.
If this does not help, please let me know, and maybe you
17 matches
Mail list logo
