Beta 2 sounds right given that this is just sync'ing up with SDO version 1.0.
On 9/5/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sounds good to me.
On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
support SDO 2.1
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0
release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple
days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to
include DAS in the SCA 1.0
sounds good to me.
On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0
release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple
days, and if we
I have attached patch for TUSCANY-961+ TUSCANY-986 combined in TUSCANY-961.
One observation here -
Generated code shows usage of deprecated method FactoryBase.getProperty(Type,
int) and needs to be replaced by getLocalProperty(), any changes needed in
xsdtojava generator in SDO?
Any suggestions?
With the DAS beta1 release out, I'd like to look forward to things
that we want to do next for DAS.
I think that there are still couple things that we can improve our
core DAS features, the main one would be adding support for multiple
DAS implementations, and review our SDO 2.1 APIs usage.
As
