Re: Script implementation

2008-02-07 Thread ant elder
On Feb 7, 2008 6:35 AM, Chandrashekhar Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, The current script implementation examples deal with function calls. What if the as in the case of Ruby we have classes, and the methods have parameters which are in turn Ruby objects. Does the current Ruby

Re: Script implementation

2008-02-07 Thread jain . chandra
: Script implementation On Feb 7, 2008 6:35 AM, Chandrashekhar Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, The current script implementation examples deal with function calls. What if the as in the case of Ruby we have classes, and the methods have parameters

Script implementation

2008-02-06 Thread Chandrashekhar Jain
Hi all, The current script implementation examples deal with function calls. What if the as in the case of Ruby we have classes, and the methods have parameters which are in turn Ruby objects. Does the current Ruby Script implementation handle this case. If so, do we have an example

Re: Script Implementation

2007-12-23 Thread jain . chandra
Hi Luciano, thanks for the information. I was looking at different implementations and i found script implementation different from the way the tuscany tutorials have documented. I was curious if there was a specific motivation for the difference regards, chandra - Original

Re: Script Implementation

2007-12-21 Thread Luciano Resende
The Script Implementation is based on the extension-helper module, some of the things you are expecting is available there. If you are trying to understand how you could implement new implementation types, I'd recommend the sample/implementation-crud and for binding sample/binding-echo and binding

Script Implementation

2007-12-20 Thread Chandrashekhar Jain
Hi all, I am new to tuscany and had a doubt. 1. In the case of the Script Implementation we have defined org.apache.tuscany.sca.implementation.script.ScriptImplementationActivator in org.apache.tuscany.sca.extension.helper.ImplementationActivator file. This is the only class I noticed