Dear kevin.morfitt
2009/10/6 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk:
Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye wrote:
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk a écrit :
Here are links to the patches and notes on their states:
- [U-boot] [PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ change for
Blackfin pieces like commit 0630535e2d062dd73c1ceca5c6125c86d1127a49.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
include/asm-blackfin/config.h |3 +++
include/asm-blackfin/global_data.h |1 -
lib_blackfin/board.c |2 --
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3
All arches apparently should reset the watchdog in their udelay loop as
noted on the mailing list recently:
A comment in flash_status_check() suggests that udelay() is
expected to reset the watchdog, but I can't find any architecture
where it does.
If this is missing in other
All arches apparently should reset the watchdog in their udelay loop as
noted on the mailing list recently:
A comment in flash_status_check() suggests that udelay() is
expected to reset the watchdog, but I can't find any architecture
where it does.
If this is missing in other
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 7:33 PM
To: Dudhat Dipen-B09055
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] ppc/p1_p1_RDB: DDR Relocation
support for NAND/SD/eSPI Boot
[snip]
---
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
If source and destination are aligned, this copies ulong values
until possible, trailing part is copied by byte. Thanks for the details
to Wolfgang Denk, Mike Frysinger, Peter Tyser, Chris Moore.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by:
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
If the destination is aligned, fill ulong values until possible.
Then fill remaining part by bytes.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
lib_generic/string.c | 22 +++---
Actually, we should use memmove here, as areas overlap, but memmove is
not yet optimized.
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
common/lcd.c | 21 -
1 files changed, 0
main.c: In function 'abortboot':
main.c:122: warning: too few arguments for format
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
include/configs/cpuat91.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/cpuat91.h b/include/configs/cpuat91.h
index
Chris Moore wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea but shouldn't it be more like this
(untested) code :
void * memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count)
{
char *d8, *s8;
unsigned long *dl = dest, *sl = src;
In here, would it be overkill to add byte copying
On Friday 09 October 2009 05:12:20 Alessandro Rubini wrote:
+ /* while all data is aligned (common case), copy a word at a time */
+ if ( (((ulong)dest | (ulong)src | count) (sizeof(*dl) - 1)) == 0) {
i think you want to drop the count from the list, otherwise we dont consume
the
On Friday 09 October 2009 06:11:16 Mark Jackson wrote:
Chris Moore wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea but shouldn't it be more like this
(untested) code :
void * memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count)
{
char *d8, *s8;
unsigned long *dl = dest, *sl =
i think you want to drop the count from the list, otherwise we dont consume
the leading groups of 4 bytes if count isnt a multiple of 4.
Yes, same for memset. See Wolfgang it was not 10% more? These micro
optimizations are hairy, as you need to measure them to make sure they
work.
Ok, V4
Dear Chris Moore,
In message 4acebf19.4010...@free.fr you wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with the idea but shouldn't it be more like this
(untested) code :
Thanks for catching this.
Of course you are right - my code was untested as well, as usual ;-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
include/nomadik.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/nomadik.h b/include/nomadik.h
index d9405fd..ea65b2d
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
drivers/misc/Makefile|1 +
drivers/misc/stmpe2401.c | 176 ++
include/stmpe2401.h | 66
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
include/configs/nhk8815.h |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/nhk8815.h
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
common/lcd.c | 26 --
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/lcd.c b/common/lcd.c
index
This adds support for display and keypad on the Nomadik evaluation kit.
I tried to split the changes as best as I can. First the amba-lcd
is added as a generic driver, although it receives pre-computed register
values, as it misses the code to assemble register bits from higher-level
parameters.
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
board/st/nhk8815/Makefile |5 ++-
board/st/nhk8815/keypad.c | 100
board/st/nhk8815/nhk8815.c |5
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
board/st/nhk8815/config.mk |7 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/st/nhk8815/config.mk
From: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini rub...@unipv.it
Acked-by: Andrea Gallo andrea.ga...@stericsson.com
---
board/st/nhk8815/Makefile |1 +
board/st/nhk8815/lcd.c | 89
board/st/nhk8815/nhk8815.c |4
Sorry for late reply.
At current implementation. only block write supported. Of course, I
wrote the partial write.
I will post the latest patches.
Sorry. Please wait until next Monday
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tuma chernigovs...@spb.gs.ru wrote:
Hello, All!
My
On Oct 9, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Dudhat Dipen-B09055 wrote:
+
+void initsdram(void)
+{
+
+volatile ccsr_ddr_t *ddr= (ccsr_ddr_t
*)CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR;
+int d_init, dbw;
+volatile ccsr_gpio_t *pgpio = (void *)
(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_GPIO_ADDR);
+unsigned int ddr_size;
+
I think I found a problem in cpu/mips/start.S.
gp register is used to point to the SDRAM. But after gp is adjusted to
proper location, a C function flush_cache is called. But this function
actually changes gp register before gp is used to jump to SDRAM. That
makes the u-boot run from flash and
DDR support to boot from NAND/eSDHC/eSPI on P1 P2 RDB platforms.
Specifically this support needed when L2 Cache size is less than 512K.
Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat dipen.dud...@freescale.com
---
- Applies to http://git.denx.de/u-boot.git
- Changes from v2: integrated kumar's comments.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:12:04PM +0530, Dipen Dudhat wrote:
DDR support to boot from NAND/eSDHC/eSPI on P1 P2 RDB platforms.
Specifically this support needed when L2 Cache size is less than 512K.
If you're going to use this for eSDHC and eSPI, why is it sitting under
nand_spl?
-Scott
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Dipen Dudhat wrote:
+void initsdram(void)
+{
+
+ volatile ccsr_ddr_t *ddr= (ccsr_ddr_t *)CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR;
+ int d_init, dbw;
+ volatile ccsr_gpio_t *pgpio = (void *)
(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_GPIO_ADDR);
+ unsigned int ddr_size;
+
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:48 PM
To: Dudhat Dipen-B09055
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] ppc/p1_p2_RDB: DDR Relocation
supportfor NAND/SD/eSPI Boot
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:12:04PM +0530, Dipen Dudhat
Dudhat Dipen-B09055 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:48 PM
To: Dudhat Dipen-B09055
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] ppc/p1_p2_RDB: DDR Relocation
supportfor NAND/SD/eSPI Boot
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:54:20 -0400
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
commit 6d0f6bcf337c5261c08fabe12982178c2c489d76 did the big
rename of CFG_ macros to CONFIG_SYS macros. But it missed
a couple of instances within comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:51 PM
To: Dudhat Dipen-B09055
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] ppc/p1_p2_RDB: DDR Relocation
support for NAND/SD/eSPI Boot
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:42
On Oct 9, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Dudhat Dipen-B09055 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:51 PM
To: Dudhat Dipen-B09055
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] ppc/p1_p2_RDB: DDR
From: Jason McMullan mcmul...@netapp.com
Signed-off-by: Jason McMullan jason.mcmul...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
v2
- fix up issues after talking to Jason
Wolfgang: is this ok to merge for this release ? it's been sitting
around for a long time and the
Some of the new spi flash files were missing explicit license lines.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
CC: Haavard Skinnemoen haavard.skinnem...@atmel.com
---
this needs Haavard's approval since he wrote/submitted the original code
common/cmd_sf.c |2 ++
Hi all,
I have used UPM in a MPC83xx with LBC running at 64MHz.
Now I have a MPC85xx, with LBC at 41MHz.
It only works if I put a delay in drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c :
nand_write_buf(), otherwise I lost one byte. But it takes t long
writing, which makes their use impractical.
I saw in
I've made a bit of progress on this with some off-list help by Albin Tonnerre.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Dan Christensen ope...@opello.org wrote:
Hello. I'm attempting to use the AT91 SD/MMC patches with my
AT91SAM9G45-EK-ES devkit to boot a Linux kernel off of an SD card.
Starting
This patch re-formats the arm920t s3c24x0 driver files, excluding the nand
driver, in preparation for changes to add support for the Embest SBC2440-II
Board.
The changes are as follows:
- re-indent the code using Lindent
- make sure register layouts are defined using a C struct
- replace the
This patch re-formats the arm920t s3c24x0 nand driver in preparation for changes
to add support for the Embest SBC2440-II Board.
The changes are as follows:
- re-indent the code using Lindent
- make sure register layouts are defined using a C struct
- replace the upper-case typedef'ed C struct
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, J. William Campbell
jwilliamcampb...@comcast.net wrote:
Graeme Russ wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 AM, J. William Campbell
jwilliamcampb...@comcast.net wrote:
40 matches
Mail list logo
