Hi Doug,
Doug Kehn wrote:
--- Greg Ungerer wrote:
And by popular request here is a big patch that will
bring a
stock 2.6.22 kernel up to a uClinux-dist 2.6.x level
kernel:
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/uClinux-2.6.x/linux-2.6.22-uc0-big.patch.gz
iptables fails to compile after
Hi Erwin,
Erwin Authried wrote:
I took a short look into the patch, it seems that
at91x40_gettimeoffset() in arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40_time.c isn't
correct. It doesn't read from the right channel number. I have seen that
Yes, good catch, I'll fix that.
the timer routines are hardcoded
Hi All,
An update of the uClinux (MMU-less) code against 2.6.22.
Quite a few changes, some cleanup, some bug fixes.
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/uClinux-2.6.x/linux-2.6.22-uc0.patch.gz
This is mostly m68knommu changes, and some ARM mmuless changes
I plan on pushing as well.
Change
I took a short look into the patch, it seems that
at91x40_gettimeoffset() in arch/arm/mach-at91/at91x40_time.c isn't
correct. It doesn't read from the right channel number. I have seen that
the timer routines are hardcoded for timer channel 1, formerly this was
configurable with KERNEL_TIMER. This
Greg Ungerer wrote:
An update of the uClinux (MMU-less) code against 2.6.22.
Quite a few changes, some cleanup, some bug fixes.
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/uClinux-2.6.x/linux-2.6.22-uc0.patch.gz
And by popular request here is a big patch that will bring a
stock 2.6.22 kernel up to
Hi Jamie,
--- Jamie Lokier wrote:
Greg Ungerer wrote:
An update of the uClinux (MMU-less) code against
2.6.22.
Quite a few changes, some cleanup, some bug fixes.
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/uClinux-2.6.x/linux-2.6.22-uc0.patch.gz
And by popular request here is a big patch
Thanks for your reply, Doug.
Doug Kehn wrote:
The subtle difference is with '*big*'. The link
without '*big*' is for non-MMU targets. The link with
'*big*' is for MMU targets (it may also have non-MMU
in it too).
That is subtle. I have to wonder why not '-nommu' and '-mmu' if
that's the
