Thanks for your reply, Doug. Doug Kehn wrote: > The subtle difference is with '*big*'. The link > without '*big*' is for non-MMU targets. The link with > '*big*' is for MMU targets (it may also have non-MMU > in it too).
That is subtle. I have to wonder why not '-nommu' and '-mmu' if that's the difference :-) Are there other differences between the patches, e.g. features, driver patches etc.? In other words, should I use the -big one even though I've got a no-MMU device? I'm working on some Sigma Designs no-MMU ARM devices, and I'm taking a (very) tentative look at porting the code from 2.4.26 to a 2.6 kernel. Most of Sigma's code is proprietary, but their big kernel patch and some drivers are GPL, and it seems feasible to port it. But there's a lot of changes from 2.4 to 2.6, and the recent messages about 2.6 no-MMU ARM support being virtually non-existent suggest it might be a lot of work. Thanks, -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
