Hi Tapas,
I haven't looked at this in a long time ... probably the last time I
tried was on Geronimo 2.1.1 (but I don't really recall).
Here are some links and email threads on previous discussions of Grails
Geronimo that might be of help.
Article (somewhat old now but worth a read):
All,
Please join me in welcoming Ashish Jain as the newest committer on the
Apache Geronimo project. The Geronimo PMC is excited that Ashish has
accepted our invitation.
Congratulations Ashish and keep up the good work!
Joe
+1
Joe
Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a plugin that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo
2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new
OpenJPA 2.0.0-beta, so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0
certified codebase.
I just updated the hosted
Congrats Jack! Well deserved.
Joe
Ivan wrote:
I would like to welcome Jack aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was just
created this morning (caijunj), so you should start seeing some commits
from him soon.
--
Ivan
Forrest Xia wrote:
Are you using a complete geronimo version? seems you are using a
simplified version which does not include admin console module.
Forrest is correct and it seems you are not using a javaee5 assembly.
More specifically, if you want the admin console out of the box then
you
The warning concerning the missing geronimo-web.xml is not related to
the INFO message about the Strict Manifest Classpath processing.
Concerning the LenientMFCP: This option was added to support archives
that don't adhere to the standard specification which requires that the
manifest
There have been a few people posting about some problems on Vista. Most
of those seem to be related to issues starting the server and/or using
eclipse. It sounded like you were beyond any of those problems. I
haven't tried Vista myself so I don't have any first hand knowledge. It
seems
I looked back at your original post and it looks like you were
attempting to install from your local repo rather than from the 2.1.2
samples repo (and the geronimo repo you mentioned seeing didn't quite
make sense as it contained the wrong version). So I'm not sure of the
exact
If you are using the 2.1.3 jetty javaee5 assembly
(geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1.3) then I am a little confused by your
earlier statements on the repositories you see in the plugins portlet.
They don't seem to be the list I would expect (see below).
Also, there are some issues installing
I am not at all familiar with icefaces but I suspect that underneath it
all you might be having some classloader issues. Geronimo already
includes myfaces which seems to be involved in this problem. If your
application is also including myfaces (and perhaps other jars) then you
might need
Is the spadim (rather than spadmin) a typo in this email only or is
it also reflected in your xml?
Joe
johnxmas wrote:
shouldn't
principal name=scort designated-run-as=true
class
=org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.GeronimoGroupPrincipal/
be
principal
Based on the server output listed below it looks to me like you are
using the minimal (little-G) tomcat assembly. This assembly does not
include the console. The console is only included in the Java EE 5
certified assemblies. You can either install the console into the
little-G image that
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I've been playing around with grails and I encountered this exact same
behavior Michael mentioned. Even with Gianny's recommended hidden
classes I received the dom4j InvalidXPathException on the Tomcat
Javaee5 assembly
I've been playing around with grails and I encountered this exact same
behavior Michael mentioned. Even with Gianny's recommended hidden
classes I received the dom4j InvalidXPathException on the Tomcat Javaee5
assembly.
I was able to get a grails app working on a tomcat javaee5 assembly by
Hi Marco,
What version of Geronimo are you using? If you are using any even a
remotely current version of G you should be using this namespace:
xmlns=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/application-2.0;
See http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/deployment-plans.html for a more
complete
Please include a scenario as well with your JIRA. I did the following
and the postgresql jar was installed geronimo-home/repository:
- installed the server-specific repo plugin
- from the admin console, installed the automatic download function to
install postgresql jdbc driver 8.2
- the jar
Joe Bohn wrote:
Forrest_Xia wrote:
For example, you use automatic download function to install postgresql
jdbc
driver 8.2, the driver will be installed in var/respository
But, if you install a war from admin console, it will be just
installed in
geronimo_home/repository.
This different
Forrest_Xia wrote:
For example, you use automatic download function to install postgresql jdbc
driver 8.2, the driver will be installed in var/respository
But, if you install a war from admin console, it will be just installed in
geronimo_home/repository.
This different behavior is
Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Forrest_Xia wrote:
For example, you use automatic download function to install
postgresql jdbc
driver 8.2, the driver will be installed in var/respository
But, if you install a war from admin console, it will be just
installed in
geronimo_home/repository
was that the
war was not deployed to var/repository. Can you clarify Forrest_Xia?
Joe
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Forrest_Xia wrote:
For example, you use automatic download function to install postgresql
jdbc
driver 8.2
Donald,
I think you are also going to need to get a release of genesis 1.3.1
(alternative would be to revert back to 1.3 or upgrade to 1.4 ... but
that would require some changes for legal checking). BTW, I would love
to see this SNAPSHOT removed anyway as it causes problems for long tck
Peter Petersson wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Peter,
The samples are a little in flux at the moment but they should build.
I just started with a fresh checkout and clean repo and they built for
me.
What version of maven are you using? It is strange that the versions
are not specified
Peter,
The samples are a little in flux at the moment but they should build. I
just started with a fresh checkout and clean repo and they built for me.
What version of maven are you using? It is strange that the versions
are not specified in /repository/pom.xml ... but I don't hit the
Joe Bohn wrote:
+1
I think we will need to have a mechanism to ensure additions are valid
and match what a user has asked to post. I propose that we use JIRA as
a tool to receive requests to be included in the list(s) and as a place
to store the requested content. That will provide some
+1
I think we will need to have a mechanism to ensure additions are valid
and match what a user has asked to post. I propose that we use JIRA as
a tool to receive requests to be included in the list(s) and as a place
to store the requested content. That will provide some record keeping
Oh ... and one more question: Have you noticed any problems aside from
the messages? Do the virtual hosts seem to work?
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
Hi Teddy,
I don't have any ideas yet, but I think this is possibly a bug given
that I've seen the something similar in one of our samples
Just in case you didn't find it yet ... there are directions on building
Geronimo here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo.html
Also, please consider using branches/2.1
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1) rather
than branches/2.1.2 for
Yes, there is certainly room for improvement in documentation. I think
that is a struggle for all open source projects and Geronimo is no
exception. As I'm sure you've heard before - contributions are welcome
:-). Some more comments/questions in-line below.
Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a release candidate of Geronimo 2.1.2 is currently being voted
on. If all goes well and no critical issues are discovered we will make
it available next week.
Joe
jklcom99 wrote:
We're looking to upgrade to G2.1.x. Is there a scheduled date for the next
stable release?
Is this a fresh Geronimo 2.1.1 image without any changes? I've heard of
things like this before when the config.xml has been modified regarding
the TomcatWebConnector entries (or perhaps additional configurations
have been added to include additional entries).
Joe
derJoe wrote:
Hi,
I'm
didn't realize that you were using Chinese. Given that it
works in 2.1.2 it sounds like the problem was GERONIMO-4095
(http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4095). We'll hopefully
be releasing 2.1.2 very soon.
Joe
Thanks!
Tommy
-邮件原件-
发件人: Joe Bohn
Those INFO messages aren't related to your problem ... they are harmless.
Can you give some more details? Are you using a Tomcat or Jetty server
image? What are you seeing in the browser when you attempt to create
the new DB and what browser are you using? What DB were you trying to
Wing Yung wrote:
Hi,
Is there an easy way to upgrade libraries in the repository? For
example, how could I upgrade jline from version 0.9.91 to 0.9.94 (to
enable 64-bit Windows support)? I noticed that dependency information
is written to the config.ser files and I could use
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Shiva Kumar H R as the newest member of
the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Shiva working with us as a
committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing
oversight of the Geronimo project.
Way to go
-r615303.jar
catalina-6.0.14-G614585.jar
jasper-6.0.14-G614585.jar
After manually installing the jars I was able to successfully build all
the samples.
Thank you for your suggestion
Regards
Ashish
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
ivan wrote:
Hi again!
So, to build geronimo is not very important for me... I wanted just to
see file TransactionImpl... But I can not find this file in project
geronimo-transaction... Search in folder f:\g-2.0.1 didn't return
matches. Where I can find file TransactionImpl of
Excellent - thank you!
Joe
石田 剛 wrote:
Hello, Geronimo-fans.
We, The Japan Apache Geronimo Users Group , are proud to announce that
we've completed all the Geronimo 2.0 documents translation. Now it's on
the Geronimo Wiki.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running both JBoss and Geronimo side-by-side on a laptop development
environment. I edited the above file and changed the NamingPort from 1099
to 1098, since JBoss uses the same, however when I try to shutdown
Geronimo using bin/geronimo.sh stop, I get the
David Jencks wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 9:55 PM, michaelg wrote:
I am writing an article for IBM developerWorks on using Grails and
Geronimo
together. However, I am unable to deploy a Grails WAR to Geronimo.
I first tried it with Geronimo 2.1.1 with Jetty. The error I got was a
certification paperwork submitted. I understand
that it takes a while for syncing with the Apache mirrors ... so it will
be a couple days before we can get things set up on our web site.
Thank you all!
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server
Sorry ... I had intended to copy this list as well ...
Joe
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Geronimo Server 2.1.1 Release - RC2
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:41:28 -0400
From: Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Geronimo Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
I've
This is a discussion thread for issues related to the Geronimo Server
2.1.1 release candidate (rc2) currently up for vote.
Please vote.
Joe
We're currently working hard to get a 2.1.1 release out the door. The
biggest issues at the moment are dependencies that must also be
released: OpenEJB 3.0, ActiveMQ 4.1.x, ActiveIO 3.0.x. I'd love to say
that we would have these within a week or so and be ready to commence
with a
Hernan,
Did you get a chance to give the 1.2 version a shot and see if it fixed
your problem? I'm wondering if this is an issue for 2.1.1. Also, is
there a JIRA for this issue?
Thanks,
Joe
Hernan Cunico wrote:
yup, using the 1.1 version available on G 2.1. I'll give 1.2 a shot
All,
It is my privilege to announce that Jason has recently accepted an
invitation to join the Apache Geronimo project. Jason has been working
on Geronimo for a while now in multiple areas including J2G, javamail,
G-shell commands, samples, and many more things. He is always eager to
help
The Geronimo team is pleased to announce the release of the Geronimo
JavaMail Spec 1.4, version 1.3
This release includes two bug fixes, GERONIMO-3842 and GERONIMO-3853.
Enjoy,
-The Geronimo team
The Geronimo team is pleased to announce the release of the Geronimo
JavaMail_1.4 version 1.4 (yes, the javamail spec version and the
Geronimo bundle version are at the moment both 1.4).
This release includes an upgrade to leverage Genesis 1.4, leveraging the
new 1.3 version of the
BenLeino wrote:
Hi,
I have still the bug in latest Geronimo 2.1 release from 18.02 with the
pluto portlet exception mentioned here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3855
How can I get a working(!) copy of the current 2.1 build of Geronimo? Is
there any bugfix available?
Thanks
XGuy wrote:
When I use shutdown.bat I am asked for a username:
I type in admin and then I type in my password when prompted for it and
then the screen goes away in a flash. I do not know what those exceptions
are.
I take a look at the Geronimo startup screen and Geronimo is still running.
I
I've updated this notice with a better location from which to obtain the
jetty-6.1.7.jar (see below).
Joe Bohn wrote:
The Geronimo project has learned of a security vulnerability in the
Jetty servlet container (6.1.5) included in Geronimo. If you use a
Jetty configuration of Geronimo you may
The Geronimo project has learned of a security vulnerability in the
Jetty servlet container (6.1.5) included in Geronimo. If you use a
Jetty configuration of Geronimo you may be affected by the vulnerability.
This vulnerability impacts Jetty configurations of Geronimo 2.0.1 and 2.0.2.
For
The latest Geronimo released is 2.0.2 and it includes support for
Servlet 2.5 JSP 2.1. Geronimo 1.1.1 was Servlet 2.4 and JSP 2.0. I
suspect either should be downward compatible with Servlet 2.4 JSP 1.3.
Joe
John Richard Moser wrote:
nmap claims Tomcat/Catalina JSP 1.1 for the latest
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
cross-posting this to the user-list so that we can get a direct
feedback from our dear users.
1. Dynamic status messages. Some operations may
.
2) Go into your local maven repository after a failed build attempt and
edit groovy/groovy-all/1.0/groovy-all-1.0.pom. Remove everything
between dependencies and /dependencies in the pom. Then rebuild.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
Aman Nanner/MxI Technologies wrote:
Would this workaround require
Aman,
It isn't just you. This is a problem that began yesterday due to some
changes in one of our dependencies which should not have happened.
See: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.groovy.user/25859
and: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-550
I'm trying to find a work-around
that will allow 2.0.2 to be built successfully.
I'm really hoping the maven/groovy folks will come up with the real fix
soon.
Joe
Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10-25-2007 11:52:01 AM:
Aman,
It isn't just you. This is a problem that began yesterday due to some
changes in one of our
I'm not certain if it's the same problem ... but I've experienced
something similar from time to time. I've had the java process appear
to hang at that point.
The only way to kill the process was using Acitivity monitor and force
quit (ctrl-C didn't touch it).
After that I can usually
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi Ted,
it would be great to add which modules are critical for Geronimo to run,
in other words, those we should never mess with. We had a discussion
some time ago but I don't think we ever properly covered this.
I added some safety checks in the web console for this.
Paul McMahan wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I would suggest not to undeploy tomcat in step 2 and use deploy.sh
redeploy at step 6. If this works, then you need not worry about
restarting any apps that might have got stopped when tomcat was
undeployed as
David,
Should we expose these attributes in the config.xml and
config-substitions.properties in our default assemblies so that they are
more easily edited? Also, is the current default of 500 still
appropriate? It looks like this was changed from 300 to 500 as part of
your work to hook
Ray,
What release of Geronimo were you using (and which web container)?
What were you doing when you hit this problem? Was it from the Geronimo
Web Console or one of your own applications?
Thanks,
Joe
Ray Hurst wrote:
HTTP Status 500 -
as milestone 1 of Geronimo 2.0. If you were using trunk and hit this
problem then it would appear that Geronimo has a problem. I'm hoping
that you were doing this on Geronimo 1.* ... am I correct?
Regards,
Joe
Ray Hurst wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Ray,
What release of Geronimo were you using
I picked up the jetty j2ee image and ran some quick, simple tests. So
far everything looks good. I was able to deploy a web application, use
various console functions including the DB pool wizard, and some others.
I did notice that the old keystore portlet is still included in the web
Ken, Thanks for all the hard work pulling us into shape and for the
incredible amount of patience that you've displayed.
Matt, Congratulations on a well deserved appointment!
Joe
Jeff Genender wrote:
I would like to offer some important news:
We have just had a changing of the guard for
Hi Mattias,
Thanks for giving the image a test run.
The problem you hit is a known problem in trunk which may have been
fixed just after the weekly build was created (I haven't checked yet to
see if it really is fixed in trunk).
Anyway, you can work-around this problem by creating an empty
Well ... sorta and sorta not ...
Aaron did some work in the Quartz plugin that included a brute force
method to add new items to the admin console via a GBean included with
the Quartz plugin that modifies the Pluto portal config. It's really
creative stuff within the limits of the current
Yes, just use the --inPlace option. For help on the deploy command you
can issue the following from the \bin directory:
java -jar deployer.jar help deploy
or
deploy.bat help deploy
For general help issue this command from the same location:
java -jar deployer.jar help
or
deploy.bat help
Joe
and try
to build it independently too. But it was not successful either. It
needs some stuff from Geronimo.
Thanks,
Lasantha Ranaweera
Joe Bohn wrote:
Lasantha,
I've been hitting this same problem. I think I can help you work
around it but we don't have a fix yet (or at least I don't have
This problem is caused by some missing directories that are expected to
be present even if the sharelib capability isn't being used. The
directories are included in the image(s) but depending upon the utility
used to unpack the tar or zip they may not be created in the file system.
To
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot
lose. -- Jim Elliot
,
the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn.
Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as of
recent, the work on our minimal distributions.
His work shows initiative, concern to get user feedback, empathy for
problems faced by other committers
XBean a success.
We believe he will be an excellent addition to the project and will
help foster these values in others.
Please join us in congratulating Guillaume,
The Apache Geronimo PMC
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he
(MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDxoBC1xC6qnMLUpYRAsu9AJ9c2lfxpGQzuW12Zzjpbf4rxf5bWQCdGExp
2G9O5Eiq8j2CmVHMqsKXXbg=
=pWuN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn at earthlink.net
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what
not able to select any previous log files through Server Log
Viewer Portlet to view the log messages in it.
The pull down menu displays only one log file which is being currently
written to.
does Server Log viewer portlet display all the log files created ?
Thanks
phani
--
Joe Bohn
configuration portals are completely broken.
Add/edit functionality appears to be commented out in the JSPs. Attempts to use
the Add/Edit URLs directly fails to create destinations.
Afew other issues around JMS, I'll post some stack traces.
--
Joe Bohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He is no fool who
no geronimo
deployment plan? To which container(s) are they deployed? Is the
choice of the container a deployment decision (deploy command) or a
run-time decision (start/stop command)?
Thanks,
Joe
--
Joe Bohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 25, 2005, at 8:42 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The default Geronimo configuration includes both the Jetty and Tomcat
web containers predeployed and started by default.
I'm hoping we can find a way soon so this is not the case.
Therefore, it would follow (when
.
But when I go to the console the ‘JMS Connection Factory’ shows ‘Error
in portlet!’ , where can I find details of the error so I can find out
what the problem is ?
Kind regards,
Marco Laponder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joe Bohn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He is no fool who
curious. Thanks for your help!
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Now it looks like I'm having problems with OpenEJB and ActiveMQ:
I'm getting this:
Attempting to download activemq-ra-3.1-SNAPSHOT.rar.
Error retrieving artifact from
[http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/activemq
79 matches
Mail list logo
