Hi
I want to define a custom JAASRealm in geronimo tomcat module and get this
realm via org.apache.catalina.Container.getRealm() or
org.apache.catalina.Context.getRealm().
Here is the custom realm definition:
gbean name=TomcatEngine class=org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.EngineGBean
attribute
BTW, I am using Geronimo 1.1.1
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JAASRealm-configuration-problem-tf4509058s134.html#a12859615
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All,
I'm having a slight problem with a security realm in an EAR. I have two
webapps that I would like to authenticate via a container managed FORM
Auth, webapp and webappadmin. I have the webapp realm functioning
without any issues. Of course, I cut and pasted from webapp to
webappadmin
The schemas are here
http://geronimo.apache.org/xml-schemas.html
Please bear with us while we fix this and other samples and move the
code to svn.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/23/07, dbrenck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so far, but here may be another thing with the samples:
Checking the
you only specify the security configuration itself once per ear. For
each web-app you specify the security-realm that comes right before
the security configuration. You might put the security element at
the top level of the ear plan rather than in one or the other web app
plan.
hope
Hello,
I'm using geronimo 2.0.1 and I try to send a simple textMessage to a JMSQueue.
First, I have configured a JMS-Ressource for ActiveMQ with the geronimo
console. You can see the full DeploymentPlan at the end of this email.
The Connectionfactory becomes the name: MyFactory
The
Thanks for the quick reply David.
If I understand you, I need to have a security-realm-name section
defined in each webapps geronimo-web.xml without a security section
defined, and then have a security section defined in the EAR. This
would mean no changes to the web.xml for either app. Where
Hi all,
It's been more than a year since I last tried to run SPECjAppServer2004
on Geronimo, and now I'm getting back to that task. I see Geronimo has
grown a lot in this year, and SPECjAppServer2004 now has an EAStress
research mode to make development publications easy, so I'm looking
forward
Hi, all,
I'm trying to deploy SPECjAppServer2004 on G2.0.1, and ejb-jar.xml files
in SjAS modules start with the following lines:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise
JavaBeans 2.0//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd;
When I
Thanks! Geronimo Rocks!
Original Message
Subject: Re: EAR Security Realm Configuration
From: Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, September 24, 2007 12:21 pm
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
On 9/24/07, Mark Aufdencamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the
Hi all,
we are currently investigating alternatives to JBoss AS. While Geromino
looks really, really promising, I could not quite make out whether
Geronimo features an equivalent to JBoss SARs, we absolutely need. In
case you are not familiar with SARs, here's the bottom line:
* SARs are
Do you have references to the ConnectionFactory and Queue in your web.xml ?
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/jms-and-mdb-sample-application.html has an
example. Although the example uses annotations the setup would be the same
to be able to access the JMS resources via JNDI.
On 9/24/07, Jochen
Hi all,
I tried searching for an answer on this one, but couldnt find anything.
I'm using geronimo 2, struts 2 and the latest log4j package. I've deployed
an ear file with an ejb jar and a war file.
For the most part, everything works just fine. However, despite the fact
that I have my
On Sep 24, 2007, at 5:34 AM, Jörg Henne wrote:
Hi all,
we are currently investigating alternatives to JBoss AS. While
Geromino looks really, really promising, I could not quite make out
whether Geronimo features an equivalent to JBoss SARs, we
absolutely need. In case you are not
I've been doing some research into using Geronimo 2.0.1 to host some
EJB3 session beans, interacting with a stand-alone client. I can
connect to the server and call methods fine, but I've encountered some
difficulties with security. Specifically I've tried using
Context.SECURITY_PRINCIPAL and
On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Kory Markevich wrote:
I've been doing some research into using Geronimo 2.0.1 to host some
EJB3 session beans, interacting with a stand-alone client. I can
connect to the server and call methods fine, but I've encountered some
difficulties with security.
Jochen Zink pisze:
Hello,
I'm using geronimo 2.0.1 and I try to send a simple textMessage to a JMSQueue.
First, I have configured a JMS-Ressource for ActiveMQ with the geronimo console. You can see the full DeploymentPlan at the end of this email.
The Connectionfactory becomes the name:
On Sep 24, 2007, at 1:01 PM, David Carew wrote:
Do you have references to the ConnectionFactory and Queue in your
web.xml ? http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/jms-and-mdb-sample-
application.html has an example. Although the example uses
annotations the setup would be the same to be able
On Sep 24, 2007, at 6:48 PM, Kory Markevich wrote:
David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is what you need to do. With openejb standalone the
login-by-getting-jndi might work better. We could fix it in geronimo
by having you supply a realm name
I guess what I need to know is
19 matches
Mail list logo