On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:26, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
Sure:
make: *** [arch/um/kernel-offsets.s] Error 1
Sorry, I forgot this was x86_64. Try the patches up to tt-options - the
tls stuff doesn't build on x86_64 yet.
Jeff
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 23:26, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
Sure:
make: *** [arch/um/kernel-offsets.s] Error 1
Sorry, I forgot this was x86_64. Try the patches up to tt-options - the
tls stuff doesn't build on x86_64 yet.
Jeff
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
is what I had to apply to 2.6.15-rc1 to get that to work). I think that
included tls, but since the target system doesn't use it I don't know.
OK, well your recipe results in this
$ grep MODE obj1/.config
# CONFIG_MODE_TT is not
On Thursday 17 November 2005 10:37, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
is what I had to apply to 2.6.15-rc1 to get that to work). I think that
included tls, but since the target system doesn't use it I don't know.
OK, well your recipe results in
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 08:46:55AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
What do you want dumps of? (Keep in mind this is straight -rc1.
The usual disassembly.
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:58:17AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
That means you didn't get the uml-miniconf I attached to my message copied
into allno.config in the source directory.
I did, I think. I followed your recipe.
I didn't notice your miniconf was setting CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=y. I need to
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:58:17AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
That means you didn't get the uml-miniconf I attached to my message copied
into allno.config in the source directory. (Did I typo my script?)
Figured it out. When you do a O= build, the allno.config has to be in the
object
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:11:38PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
include/asm/processor.h:19: error: field `tls' has incomplete type
This is strange. It's complaining about not having a struct user_desc, which
is defined in asm-i386/ldt.h, which is included from asm-um/ldt-i386.h through
the
This gives a name to the anonymous union introduced in
skas-hold-own-ldt, allowing to build on a wider range of gccs.
It also removes ldt.h, which somehow became real, and replaces it with a
symlink, and creates ldt-x86_64.h as a copy of ldt-i386.h for now.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL
[ These four patches are 2.6.15 material, as they fix various crashes and
a compile failure ]
We have a bug in the i386 stub_syscall6 which pushes ebp before the
system call and pops it afterwards. Because we use syscall6 to
remap the stack, the old contents of the stack (and the former value
On some systems, libc PAGE_SIZE calls getpagesize, which can't
happen from a stub. So, I use UM_KERN_PAGE_SIZE, which is less
variable in its definition, instead.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.c
This patch makes stub_segv use the stub_syscall macros. This was
needed anyway, but the bug that prompted this was the discovery that
gcc was storing stuff in RCX, which is trashed across a system
call. This is exactly the sort of problem that the new macros fix.
There is a stub_syscall0 for
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
This patch makes stub_segv use the stub_syscall macros. This was
needed anyway, but the bug that prompted this was the discovery that
gcc was storing stuff in RCX, which is trashed across a system
call.
But the C-calling convention used by gcc for
Dear Wrongbot,
Thank you for your concern.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:37:14PM -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
In 64-bit world, the same is supposed to apply as well.
If RCX is now precious, it's a GCC bug that should be fixed.
Yes?
No.
Here's a technical tidbit for you to
On Thursday 17 November 2005 16:51, Rob Landley wrote:
find . -name asm
./include/asm
./include2/asm
ls -l include/asm include2/asm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm
- /home/landley/newbuild/firmware-build/tmpdir/linux-2.6.14/include/asm-um
lrwxrwxrwx 1
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
find . -name asm
./include/asm
./include2/asm
ls -l include/asm include2/asm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm
-
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:37, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
This patch makes stub_segv use the stub_syscall macros. This was
needed anyway, but the bug that prompted this was the discovery that
gcc was storing stuff in RCX, which is trashed
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
find . -name asm
./include/asm
./include2/asm
ls -l include/asm include2/asm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 landley landley 72 2005-11-17 16:46 include2/asm
-
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:03, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2005 15:10, Jeff Dike wrote:
This gives a name to the anonymous union introduced in
skas-hold-own-ldt, allowing to build on a wider range of gccs.
Or narrower range, in the case of Ubuntu Horny Hedgehog.
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:08, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 14:36, Rob Landley wrote:
Linus said this:
I think one reason -mm has worked so damn well (apart from you being
The Calmest Man on Earth(tm)) is because it's essentially been that
buffer for anything
On Friday 18 November 2005 07:48, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
find . -name asm
This all looks the same as I have here, except for the asm-i386 thing,
which I don't think matters.
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 15:54, Antoine Martin wrote:
It asked me what CPU I wanted to build for?! (make oldconfig)
It breaks if I select K7, but not if I select PPro (default).
Fully correct note... I didn't test every possible selection, and there are a
few missing stub headers (i.e.
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:26, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2005 07:48, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
find . -name asm
This all looks the same as I have here,
On Friday 18 November 2005 08:17, Rob Landley wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:08, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 14:36, Rob Landley wrote:
Linus said this:
Btw, where does this quote come from?
I think one reason -mm has worked so damn well (apart from you being
On Friday 18 November 2005 08:36, Rob Landley wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:43, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 04:09, Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 13:40, Blaisorblade wrote:
Ok, clearer: could you try removing altogether that -rlink? I'm trying
On Friday 18 November 2005 08:33, Rob Landley wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2005 01:26, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2005 07:48, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2005 21:12, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:51:33PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
find .
26 matches
Mail list logo
