I do not think that this is possible without an additional device in the
UML itself.
In fact, if you want two processes in two different UML instances to
communicate in-between themselves you should aim at a UML device. The
kernel device is probably suprlus to requirements as the two UML
ins
Masahiro,
Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2018, 05:36:18 CEST schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> Please let me ask a question about vdso-syms.lds
> under arch/x86/um/vdso/.
>
> This file exists since:
>
> commit f1c2bb8b9964ed31de988910f8b1cfb586d30091
> Author: Richard Weinberger
> Date: Mon
Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 22:20:47 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes:
> Thanks a lot! I am wondering why the same compiler works when running
> the test for a regular image. Maybe different compiler flags. Anyway
> good to learn this.
>
> Also one more slightly OT question, why is UML only doing UP
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 00:19:39 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes:
>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> > Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 15:11:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 00:19:39 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> > Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 15:11:29 CEST schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at
Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 00:19:39 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes:
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 15:11:29 CEST schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Joel Fernandes
> > wro
Thanks for the quick reply.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 15:11:29 CEST schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Joel Fernandes
> wrote:
>> > while(release_now == 0);
>>
>> while (release_now == 0)
>>
Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 15:11:29 CEST schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Joel Fernandes
wrote:
> > while(release_now == 0);
>
> while (release_now == 0)
> cpu_relax();
Not sure whether a cpu_relax() fixes the problem.
I guess the root of the prob
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> while(release_now == 0);
while (release_now == 0)
cpu_relax();
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversatio
Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2018, 12:28:02 CEST schrieb Joel Fernandes:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a kernel module to play with hrtimer subsystem and it hangs
> with UML, Any ideas on why it may be hanging? It doesn't hang on any
> of my other machines. Hopefully I'm not doing something stupid, but I
> don't thi
Thomas,
Am 09.05.2017 um 19:25 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>> IOW we write to 0xdeadbeef, catch the fault and fix it.
>
> I get this:
> thomas@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U:/mnt/c/Users/thomas/VmShare$ ./segtest
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fixing up
> SIGSEGV at 0x0, fix
Zitat von Richard Weinberger :
> Thomas,
>
> Am 09.05.2017 um 10:15 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>> attached patch work correctly under Linux. But no change under WSL.
>> As stated in the relevant GH issue, there seems to be far more road
>> blockers to make UML work under WSL.
>>
>> With you patch
Thomas,
Am 09.05.2017 um 10:15 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
> attached patch work correctly under Linux. But no change under WSL. As stated
> in the relevant GH issue, there seems to be far more road blockers to make
> UML work under WSL.
>
> With you patch I get under WSL:
>
> thomas@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U
Zitat von Richard Weinberger :
> Thomas,
>
> Can you please give the attached patch a try?
Hi,
attached patch work correctly under Linux. But no change under WSL. As
stated in the relevant GH issue, there seems to be far more road
blockers to make UML work under WSL.
With you patch I get u
Thomas,
Can you please give the attached patch a try?
Thanks,
//richard
>From b64c967e3960eff33e96f7dcff261635fffeb504 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 21:43:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] um: Drop PTRACE_OLDSETOPTIONS usage
IMHO in 2017 can assume that nobody
So far it is late 2.6. The high res timer subsystem settled fully
somewhere circa 2.6.10 if memory serves me right. One of those lovely
kernels which had VM collapse bugs :)
I am finishing testing the vector IO drivers and epoll irq controller
for them you will need 3.0 onwards
In fact, I have
Thomas,
Am 08.05.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
> Or asked he other way around:
>
> Is somewhere documented what's the minimum host kernel version that a UML
> kernel will run on?
>
> E.g.:
> building a UML kernel from 4.11 will need a host kernel version 2.6.18 with
> features x, y and z
> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Thomas Meyer :
>
>
>> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:35 schrieb Richard Weinberger :
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
We could figure how to report issues to WSL, create self-hosting unit
tests and ask them to add/fix
these
Thomas,
Am 08.05.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
> "
> Also, for a little context, the /only/software I can find /on the planet/
> that cares is User Mode Linux. Unless someone tries to run some statically
> linked |strace| or
> maybe |gdb| binary from the 2.4 era, this will simply never be
> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:35 schrieb Richard Weinberger :
>
> Thomas,
>
> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>>> We could figure how to report issues to WSL, create self-hosting unit tests
>>> and ask them to add/fix
>>> these features.
>>
>> Turns out there was already a bug report by s
Thomas,
Am 08.05.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>> We could figure how to report issues to WSL, create self-hosting unit tests
>> and ask them to add/fix
>> these features.
>
> Turns out there was already a bug report by somebody about missing UML
> support in WSL:
>
> https://github.com/
> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:05 schrieb Richard Weinberger :
>
> Thomas,
>
>> Am 08.05.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>> Sadly, UML executable bails out very early. it Looks like WSL is missing
>> some PTRACE stuff:
>>
>> thomas@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U:/mnt/c/Users/thomas/Downloads$ ./linux
>> Core dump
Thomas,
Am 08.05.2017 um 17:02 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
> Sadly, UML executable bails out very early. it Looks like WSL is missing some
> PTRACE stuff:
>
> thomas@DESKTOP-DQBDJ0U:/mnt/c/Users/thomas/Downloads$ ./linux
> Core dump limits :
> soft - NONE
> hard - NONE
> Checking that
Zitat von Richard Weinberger :
> Thomas,
>
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>> Hi,
Hi,
>>
>> Did anybody try to run UML on the new Windows 10 subsystem for Linux? I
>> wonder what missing functions may hinder to run UML on WSL?
>
> No idea.
> Can you try? I don't have acce
Thomas,
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did anybody try to run UML on the new Windows 10 subsystem for Linux? I
> wonder what missing functions may hinder to run UML on WSL?
No idea.
Can you try? I don't have access to a Windows 10 system right now
where I could tes
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Recent changes to printk() broke UML's stack trace
> output. Kill the root of the problem by using a single
> printk() statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 ins
Anton,
Am 17.03.2017 um 18:44 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
>> But you have to enable VM debugging to see it.
>
> I have most debugging enabled to make sure I do not introduce any
> re-entrancy in the IRQ handlers and/or have any allocations of the wrong
> type where they do not belong.
>
> We should pr
On 17/03/17 17:33, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 17.03.2017 um 18:04 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
>> On 17/03/17 16:56, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Anton,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anton Ivanov
>>> wrote:
Hi list, hi Richard
There is an extra check in mm/mmap.c which now
Am 17.03.2017 um 18:04 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
> On 17/03/17 16:56, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Anton,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anton Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi list, hi Richard
>>>
>>> There is an extra check in mm/mmap.c which now throws a WARN on every
>>> page in making UML unusable
On 17/03/17 17:04, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 17/03/17 16:56, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Anton,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anton Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi list, hi Richard
>>>
>>> There is an extra check in mm/mmap.c which now throws a WARN on every
>>> page in making UML unusable with t
Anton,
Am 17.03.2017 um 18:04 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
> On 17/03/17 16:56, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Anton,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anton Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi list, hi Richard
>>>
>>> There is an extra check in mm/mmap.c which now throws a WARN on every
>>> page in making UML u
On 17/03/17 16:56, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Anton,
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anton Ivanov
> wrote:
>> Hi list, hi Richard
>>
>> There is an extra check in mm/mmap.c which now throws a WARN on every
>> page in making UML unusable with the latest 4.11-rc2
> Which WARN? Can you find the
Anton,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Anton Ivanov
wrote:
> Hi list, hi Richard
>
> There is an extra check in mm/mmap.c which now throws a WARN on every
> page in making UML unusable with the latest 4.11-rc2
Which WARN? Can you find the offending commit?
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Enjoy Mindful wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://marc.info/?l=user-mode-linux-devel
> https://marc.info/?l=user-mode-linux-user
> https://sourceforge.net/p/user-mode-linux/mailman/user-mode-linux-user/
>
> I'm looking for archive tar balls for user-mode-linux-devel and
> user
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Thomas Meyer wrote:
Am 15. Januar 2017 13:16:22 MEZ schrieb [email protected]:
Hi,
there seems to be a problem with usermode linux when started
with an initial ramdisk (argument initrd=file). Here is what
happens:
Locating the bottom of
Am 15. Januar 2017 13:16:22 MEZ schrieb [email protected]:
>Hi,
>
>there seems to be a problem with usermode linux when started
>with an initial ramdisk (argument initrd=file). Here is what
>happens:
>
>
>
>Locating the bottom of the address space ... 0x1000
>Locati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Disabling drivers/nvdimm (seen only on x86_64 architecture) solved the problem.
On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 18:55 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on refreshing UML to version 4.7 in Debian.
>
> The linux source tarball we use is fr
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/17/2016 12:02 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> >> But let's ask Jeff first.
> >> Jeff, do you have a more recent SCM repo of uml-utilities?
> >
> > No, I don't believe so. Everything I have is out there somewhere.
> >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:53:34AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:01:11PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
...
> > Mattia, do you volunteer? :-)
>
> Sure, sounds good to me.
For the record, I'll follow-up soon. I'm waiting for approval from my
employer to make sure ther
On 08/17/2016 12:02 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> But let's ask Jeff first.
>> Jeff, do you have a more recent SCM repo of uml-utilities?
>
> No, I don't believe so. Everything I have is out there somewhere.
> You might check with Matt Zimmerman - he might have been doing some
> mainte
Hi Richard,
> But let's ask Jeff first.
> Jeff, do you have a more recent SCM repo of uml-utilities?
No, I don't believe so. Everything I have is out there somewhere.
You might check with Matt Zimmerman - he might have been doing some
maintenance on them.
Jeff
-
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:01:11PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 28.07.2016 16:32, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >> This is now:
> >> https://github.com/malattia/uml-utilities
> >>
> >>> The CVS repo on sourceforge is out of date though, it's missing a good
> >>> chunk of code. The last commit is
On 28.07.2016 16:32, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> This is now:
>> https://github.com/malattia/uml-utilities
>>
>>> The CVS repo on sourceforge is out of date though, it's missing a good
>>> chunk of code. The last commit is from 2004 or so.
>>>
>>> If you don't have the remainder of the code history I
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:17:09AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> > ...
> > > > I can certainl
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> ...
> > > I can certainly help with that, since I would like to do that work
> > > anyway in order to
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
...
> > I can certainly help with that, since I would like to do that work
> > anyway in order to refresh the debian package. If you want to stuff the
> > code in a git reposit
Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:03PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
>>> (the one with tunctl,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:03PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
> > (the one with tunctl, uml_mount and friends)?
> >
> > I'm maintaining[1] t
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
> (the one with tunctl, uml_mount and friends)?
>
> I'm maintaining[1] the package in Debian and I was wondering whether the
> original code is hosted somewhe
Den 2015-12-06 16:34, skrev Vegard Nossum:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running into some odd crashes when starting my UML instance
> from Python. This is my script:
>
> import subprocess
> subprocess.check_call(['path/to/vmlinux', 'mem=2048M',
> 'rootfstype=hostfs', 'rw', 'init=/bin/bash'])
Can you please
Hi!
Am 06.12.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Vegard Nossum:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running into some odd crashes when starting my UML instance from
> Python. This is my script:
>
> import subprocess
> subprocess.check_call(['path/to/vmlinux', 'mem=2048M', 'rootfstype=hostfs',
> 'rw', 'init=/bin/bash'])
>
On 07/12/15 07:24, [email protected] wrote:
> Den 2015-12-06 16:34, skrev Vegard Nossum:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been running into some odd crashes when starting my UML instance
>> from Python. This is my script:
>>
>> import subprocess
>> subprocess.check_call(['path/to/vmlinux', 'mem=2048M',
>> 'rootfstyp
Den 2015-12-06 16:34, skrev Vegard Nossum:
> Hi,
>
> I've been running into some odd crashes when starting my UML instance
> from Python. This is my script:
>
> import subprocess
> subprocess.check_call(['path/to/vmlinux', 'mem=2048M',
> 'rootfstype=hostfs', 'rw', 'init=/bin/bash'])
>
> [1.8800
Am 31.10.2015 4:39 vorm. schrieb Balaco Baco :
>
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > >> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhe
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>> I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
>> that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
>> it would work.
>
> Are you an arche
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
> that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
> it would work.
Are you an archeologist? ;-)
Is there a particular reason why you can't use somethin
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried
>> >> > > >> > with
>> >> > > >> > another option
Please, at least mark the info as being OLD OLD OLD.
90% of it is unnecessary.
--
___
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lis
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
>> > > >> > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I
>> > > >> > detailed
>> > > >> > before that end with error.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> What is your definition of recent and your definition of supported? This
> may be useful for many other users of UML I guess. The fact that the
> kernels offered in the UML website didn't work, and then I tried to
> compile from source should b
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:18, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco:
>> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
>> > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases
Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
> another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I detailed
> before that end with error.
>
> The full execution, right now, is:
>
> ==
> $./linux-
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Ricardo Nunes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm making a UML driver to adapt a real driver to UML and hardware
> emulation.
>
> In this case I have a kernel thread trying to read a register, which is now
> done through a netlink channel to a userspace application (asynchronous
Hi!
CC'ing -devel list.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Ricardo Nunes
wrote:
> I'm trying to use a real hardware driver inside UML and I,ve come to the IRQ
> suppor part.
How do you map the hardware into UML?
> Right now it's failing on request_irq call, so my question is if there is
> any ma
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> tfoerste@t44 ~/devel/linux $ make ARCH=um linux -j3
> scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfig arch/x86/um/Kconfig
> kernel/time/Kconfig:157:warning: range is invalid
This is not UML-specific. It happens on all UP-only architectures, which
i
Hi list,
Some benchmarks (current version, I believe this can do more once it
gains full epoll write support).
4 UMLs running in parallel, each pinned to a core, new raw driver - vlan
per UML, 10G NIC on 4 core 3.5GHz A8 connected back to back to an 8 core
machine running iperf server.
Server
Hi Richard, hi list.
I have found a couple of minor issues which have crept up during porting
from 3.3.8 to 3.12-3.15 (I originally wrote all of the improvements for
3.3.8/OpenWRT).
I will reissue the patchset with these fixed sometimes this week -
descriptions of issues/coming fixes inline.
On 04/09/14 20:14, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:00 PM, wrote:
>> Patch dependencies:
>>
>> [PATCH v3 01/10] Epoll based interrupt controller
>>
>> Full redesign of the existing UML poll based controller. The old
>> poll controller incurs huge penalties for IRQ sharing and
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:00 PM, wrote:
>
> Patch dependencies:
>
> [PATCH v3 01/10] Epoll based interrupt controller
>
> Full redesign of the existing UML poll based controller. The old
> poll controller incurs huge penalties for IRQ sharing and many devices
> setup due to the device list being w
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 15:44 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:55:22PM +0700, Antoine Martin wrote:
> >> Linus' vm patches broke the UML build in 3.0.75 onwards:
> >>
> >> CC mm/memory.o
> >> mm/memory.c: In
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:55:22PM +0700, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Linus' vm patches broke the UML build in 3.0.75 onwards:
>>
>> CC mm/memory.o
>> mm/memory.c: In function ‘vm_iomap_memory’:
>> mm/memory.c:2363:2: error: implicit declaratio
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:55:22PM +0700, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Linus' vm patches broke the UML build in 3.0.75 onwards:
>
> CC mm/memory.o
> mm/memory.c: In function ‘vm_iomap_memory’:
> mm/memory.c:2363:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘io_remap_pfn_range’ [-Werror=implicit-
Great to know this, thanks for keeping it up!
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:15 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Terry Hsu wrote:
> > Indeed, I am developing some functions for the virtual memory subsystem
> in
> > the kernel.
> > Q
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Terry Hsu wrote:
> Indeed, I am developing some functions for the virtual memory subsystem in
> the kernel.
> Qemu replaces UML in my case. I run qemu without kvm support because I don't
> seem to be able to run nested virtualization in virtualbox.
> Anyway now Qemu
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Richard RW. Weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> >
> >
> > > UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
> >
> >
> > so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
> > (I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
>
> KV
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
>
>
> > UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
>
>
> so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
> (I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
KVM is *much* faster than UML and *much* less hacky. :-)
Thanks,
//richard
--
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Earlence Fernandes
wrote:
> But then there's a fundamental question of whether KVM has similar
> semantics.
KVM works completely different than UML does.
> UML was incredibly useful to my project since it ran a whole "kernel +
> processes" in user space.
> Now i'
But then there's a fundamental question of whether KVM has similar
semantics.
UML was incredibly useful to my project since it ran a whole "kernel +
processes" in user space.
Now i'm confused as to whether I need to change my work so that it works
with KVM (I'm trying to read thru KVM docs to under
>UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM.
so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML?
(I Guess it may depend on the situation?)
-Earlence
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:17 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Earlence Fe
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Earlence Fernandes
wrote:
> The book (2004) states that work was going on for hardware assisted virt.
I don't think so.
> Has there been progress on it? Where do I find information on it?
> The UML source tree still comes with the original modes of operation.
UM
I'm wondering whether this was useful?
Is there any other testing that I can do to help the cause, and to help
fix this problem?
Regards,
David
On 19/01/2013 18:59, Dave Humphreys (Bob) wrote:
> I have experimented further with the network related crashing problem that I
> have had for some tim
Am Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:16:02 +
schrieb "Dave Humphreys (Bob)" :
> I note that my message sent yesterday ended up heavily truncated, so
> I have turned on the line-wrap for this one. Sorry about that.
Now it passed my spamfilter. ;-)
CC'in Al, maybe he has an idea.
Does the crash only happen
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to compile the UML, from a linux kernel(make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386)
> and I have configured it to use SMP (make config). I am getting the
> following error:
>
> CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> CC arch/um/
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
> Can you please
> give me some directions? Shall I implement in the same manner as is
> implemented in
> /arch/x86/lib/delay.c . What are the big differences between this
> implementation and in an implementation
> for UML?
If you a
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:52 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
> wrote:
> >at an interval of some nanoseconds and to use the ndelay function. I
> saw
> > that in the kernel implementation
> >for the uml
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
>at an interval of some nanoseconds and to use the ndelay function. I saw
> that in the kernel implementation
>for the uml there is no "delay_tsc"
>function and there is only the "delay_loop" function. I am wondering why
> the d
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:39 PM, richard -rw- weinberger <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
> wrote:
> > On an ubuntu kernel I used a busy waiting, with ndelay function which
> uses
> > the TSC register, but
> > I have noticed that this re
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dragos Diaconescu
wrote:
> On an ubuntu kernel I used a busy waiting, with ndelay function which uses
> the TSC register, but
> I have noticed that this register cannot be read from an UML.
Please provide a test case.
--
Thanks,
//richard
-
On 25.05.2012 11:19, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Whats keeping this patch from hitting mainline? to much ugliness?
> Is there a way to work without it (somehow)
>
UML's tty driver is a corner case. (It is a console but does not support
virtual consoles, etc...)
TTY folks are currently moving most driver
On 05/25/2012 10:40 AM, Richard RW. Weinberger wrote:
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
>> I've been running with your tty patch for a while now, and was able
>> to work. 3.3 Kernel
>>
>> Now based on 3.4 tree the patch no longer merges, too many changes.
>> But am back to the same crashes as befor
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> I've been running with your tty patch for a while now, and was able
> to work. 3.3 Kernel
>
> Now based on 3.4 tree the patch no longer merges, too many changes.
> But am back to the same crashes as before. Do you have a rough
> patch for 3.4 base I can use.
Okay,
On 03/15/2012 12:40 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 14.03.2012 23:28, schrieb Boaz Harrosh:
>> But surly it needs to go upstream. I'll run with it out of tree for now.
>
> As of now it's not ready for upstream.
> I'll submit it as -stable patch as soon as possible.
>
Richard hi,
I've been
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:17:40AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 April 2012 10:35 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> > Solving the first issue is straight forward.
> > For the second one I've to think a bit why Jeff took the current
> > static linking approach.
> >
> > Expect p
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 10:35 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> Solving the first issue is straight forward.
> For the second one I've to think a bit why Jeff took the current
> static linking approach.
>
> Expect patches for both issues in 3.5. :-)
Thanks. Can you prepare the patch?
We are
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Richard and others,
>
> I currently have 2 severity E(rrors) lintian rejects for the build I am
> preparing for Debian.
>
> The details for both the rejects are explained at:
>
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/binary-or-shlib-defines
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 02 April 2012 01:20 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>> Config file available at:
>>> > http://people.debian.org/~rrs/tmp/config.i386
>> Please give the attached patch a try!
>>
>
> Thank you Richard. The patch fixes the build
On Monday 02 April 2012 01:20 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> Config file available at:
>> > http://people.debian.org/~rrs/tmp/config.i386
> Please give the attached patch a try!
>
Thank you Richard. The patch fixes the build failure on i386.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Makefile b/arch/x86
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 02 April 2012 11:59 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>> > My initial search led me to:
>>> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27848489
>>> >
>>> > Based on the comment there, I've tried SUBARCH=i386. But t
On Monday 02 April 2012 11:59 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> > My initial search led me to:
>> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27848489
>> >
>> > Based on the comment there, I've tried SUBARCH=i386. But that didn't
>> > help. Any suggestions?
> Please share your .conf
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build uml on kernel 3.2. Following is the build failure I
> get when building on my kvm x86 box.
>
> The kvm box is arch:
> root@debian-x86:~/user-mode-linux (build)# uname -a
> Linux debian-x86 3.0.0-1-686-pae #
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
