...@krackedpress.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 15:24
On 08/14/2012 08:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Yesterday, your changes broke
through and 2 clicks instead of 1 is a pita that i wouldn't normally notice so
much.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 16/8/12, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
From: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: Bjørn Nilssen b
including reply. Does MS ever
comply with RFCs? Does it even try to or claim it tries to?
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Steven Shelton ste...@sheltonlegal.net wrote:
From: Steven Shelton ste...@sheltonlegal.net
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have
, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 15:24
On 08/14/2012 08:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote
sometimes use something
else.
What people usually mean is they have never used it as a desktop OS.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings
have moved to.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 14/8/12, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14
/8/12, Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com wrote:
From: Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com
Cc: Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com, users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
With this mix of system being used for various tasks, I would have a
mess if I tried to read emails on more than one system, even if I
could get a sync system to work properly between the various Windows
and Ubuntu systems.
This is
-users] Reply settings on this list have changed
To: anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com
Cc: Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com, users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 1:03
I primarily use SUSE but also osx and win. I support Anne.
If (as an example only) 80% of LO potential is win based
Tanstaafl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
With this mix of system being used for various tasks, I would have a
mess if I tried to read emails on more than one system, even if I
could get a sync system to work properly between the various Windows
and Ubuntu
I strongly support the change. It is the fail-safe option. Users of this
list know how to use their email to send back to the list
regards
Mike
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
På Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:31:07 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In
exactly;
and well expressed.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Bjørn K Nilssen b...@bknilssen.no wrote:
På Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:31:07 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org**:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
The questions on your poll are rather leading. The items you have
selected as questions are really not the issue at all.
This list is still a list, what else could it be? You're using it right
now as you're complaining about it. So clearly, it's not private
communication at all. You
På Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:12:33 +0200, skrev Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org:
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to thank everyone for your feedback, and assure you that I
read every bit, even if I don't manage to reply to every message in
detail.
My offer stands valid, let's
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I hope this gets to the right place. I used Reply All in
Thunderbird. The header looks correct, but people are going to get
duplicate messages.
Why not 'Reply to List' (I use the keyboard shortcut, CTRL-SHIFT-L)?
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts libreoffice
user group messages in a specific folder. But then I changed the filter
from looking at Reply-To: to To: and thought that would suffice.
Now, this morning I
On 08/14/2012 08:00 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts libreoffice
user group messages in a specific folder. But then I changed the filter
from looking at Reply-To: to To: and
and you have how many computers ???
Just wondering, when do you have time for other things? - as eating,
sleeping, or conversing with others - as friends family;
and when do you tend to various jobs; both work hobbies ???
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/14/2012 5:50 AM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
My feedback is that I don't like the change at all.
I agree. The purpose of a list like this is to share information.
Typically, when a person on a list such as this one hits REPLY, that
person is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart enough to run an email
tool. After all you're all
Linux users who administer at least one Linux installation.
And, crap, this stupid change . . . this
3 desktops, 2 laptops, 1 tablet - currently out of storage cabinets and
setup to run whenever I need it to. More in storage.
1 Blu-ray Player with Internet content apps.
3 network printers [bw duplexing, color laser, USB
printer/copier/scanner/fax], 1 USB printer [printer/scanner/copier],
On 08/14/2012 10:54 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart enough to run an email tool.
After all you're all
Linux users who administer at least one Linux
exactly; and well said.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Steven Shelton ste...@sheltonlegal.netwrote:
On 8/14/2012 5:50 AM, Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
My feedback is that I don't like the change at all.
I agree. The purpose of a list like this is to share information.
Typically, when
On 14-08-12 19:03, anne-ology wrote:
wow, you should be a great attorney;
you're very expressive.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Steven Shelton ste...@sheltonlegal.netwrote:
On 8/13/2012 7:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Not trying to be rude. All of you should be smart
I did not know that you could make the email client state Reply List
instead of the text on the Reply All button. I run Thunderbird 14.0.
I have to get use to using the Reply List instead of Reply to post a
message to the thread. It could be confusing to people, but does make
it easier to
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
I did not know that you could make the email client state Reply List
instead of the text on the Reply All button. I run Thunderbird 14.0.
I have to get use to using the Reply List instead of Reply to post a
message to the thread. It could
exactly, therefore to change the default, you're changing this list
to where folks will now be corresponding privately rather than allowing the
list to hear what's new and learn from others.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Felmon Davis dav...@union.edu wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012,
I just posted a reply to a thread to the last poster instead of the
thread by mistake. I am so use to pressing Reply and the next button
being Reply All, that I now have to remember to skip the Reply
button and remember that the Reply All button has been replaced with
Reply List. This may
exactly.
Let's take a poll - (1) to return this list to being an actual list
or
(2) to change this from a list to private
communications between only select ones, depriving the group of learning
the ins outs of
To me it seems fairly straightforward. I use Opera mail and it is great
for mailing lists as it groups all replies to one thread in a
conversation view. it also has a *Reply to list and a *Reply all
functionality. It only seems logical to me to hit reply to list as
that is what it is. anyway as
I'm subscribed to quite a few lists by now, and some of them has had
this ”new” behaviour for quite some time. I was kind of hoping THEY
would change…
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Exactly - and this is why I totally am not in favour of replying to the
person rather than the list
Our British Car list used to reply to the list and if someone asked a
question everyone saw the answers and ensuing dialogue. Someone
complained about reply to list and the reply to was changed
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope antiso...@myopera.com:
To me it seems fairly straightforward. I use Opera mail and it is great
for mailing lists as it groups all replies to one thread in a
conversation view. it also has a *Reply to list and a *Reply all
functionality. It only seems logical to me to
Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
mail client. http://mail.opera.com
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, at 09:39 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope antiso...@myopera.com:
To me it seems fairly straightforward. I use Opera mail and it is great
for
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope antiso...@myopera.com:
Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
mail client. http://mail.opera.com
I actually have an Opera Mail address, but I didn't use it for years
now; maybe it's erased by now. So it could be a good idea to use Opera
It has changed to become @myopera.com now. and as it is still in beta
phase you only have 1gb of space which is still heaps for emails! They
plan to increase it in the near future. (best thing with this is there
is no adverts to annoy me or nor is there googles stupid tracking
policy!)
On Mon, 13
Greetings,
I hope this gets to the right place. I used Reply All in
Thunderbird. The header looks correct, but people are going to get
duplicate messages.
Here is another side-effect of this change:
Florian,
Right! Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts
libreoffice user
I prefer the list, or even better a forum. I won't be bothered editing
the to/cc fields on a reply so it will be reply-all and every poster I
reply to will get a private copy. I suspect in time this will become the
norm.
Steve
On 2012-08-14 08:01, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
Greetings,
I hope
On 08/13/2012 03:37 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I'm subscribed to quite a few lists by now, and some of them has had
this ”new” behaviour for quite some time. I was kind of hoping THEY
would change…
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
ジョニー・ローゼンバーグ
It will just take some time to get use to NOT
On 08/13/2012 06:53 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 08/13/2012 03:37 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
I'm subscribed to quite a few lists by now, and some of them has had
this ”new” behaviour for quite some time. I was kind of hoping THEY
would change…
Kind regards
Johnny Rosenberg
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to
you're mis-informed; I, for one, have never used a Linus-based
machine; and I bet I'm not the only one.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote:
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on
On 8/13/2012 7:25 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:
I see the Reply List next to Reply in Thunderbird.
--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com
That reply list button is apparently a function of this list. It isn't
on any other list that I subscribe to.
Many thanks to the list managers who took care of this
I primarily use SUSE but also osx and win. I support Anne.
If (as an example only) 80% of LO potential is win based and this is the
target for growth then to be non-exclusive and encourage advancement in
the win platform the support list should cater for the most common win.
mail applications.
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to thank everyone for your feedback, and assure you that I
read every bit, even if I don't manage to reply to every message in detail.
My offer stands valid, let's wait for some more feedback and some more
days, and then make a final decision.
Florian
--
Steve, you're so right; thank you for some statistics.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Steve Edmonds
steve.edmo...@ptglobal.comwrote:
I primarily use SUSE but also osx and win. I support Anne.
If (as an example only) 80% of LO potential is win based and this is the
target for growth
On 08/13/2012 07:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
Another method is to have multiple e-addresses -
in this way, the e-address will remain valid even if the ISP
changes ;-)
each e-address is known to certain ones; I log-in to the
e-address I wish to peruse then go on to the next one, etc.
[and I'll
webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 08/13/2012 07:36 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 08/12/2012 12:31 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to
It is fine the way it is as of now, in fact I quite like the change as
it means I no longer get broken threads in my inbox which leads to it
being cluttered. so my vote lies with the change, I use to use a Linux
machine but found it beyond my comprehension so migrated back to
windows. Florian you
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
I think I discovered the secret. In this group now, it appears when
someone Reply-Alls to a posting, The To: comes from the From:
posting header entry, which is the poster's address and not
practical to filter on in this case. However, the group
I would bet that you have used a Linux based machine. and you just
never knew it. Seems like Linux is everywhere. Seems that I own a DVR, a
fancy Panasonic DVD player, and a phone that all seem to be based on
Linux. It is everywhere, we just don't know it! :-)
On 08/13/2012 07:55 PM,
Hello,
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have changed
(so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
So far, e-mails had set a reply-to the mailing list address. In other
words, with any e-mail client, replies to e-mails on the list were
automatically sent
Just testing;
and find this may be the silliest way of setting a list I've seen.
If someone cannot take the minute time to check the 'to' 'cc' 'bcc'
then the 'subject' line, then are they smart enough to operate a machine
;-)
or to handle any secure documents
At 18:31 12/08/2012 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called Reply to mangling has been disabled).
Well done!
This new way fails safe. A message intended to be public may get
sent privately by mistake - a minor
I quite like this idea of change as it now seems that less mistakes
should be made!
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, at 01:33 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
At 18:31 12/08/2012 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
this is to inform you that the reply settings on this list have
changed (so-called Reply to mangling
57 matches
Mail list logo
