On 19/04/2017 09:59, fudmer rieley wrote:
> The Oracle purchase of Sun allows oracle to claim ownership in
> application software which the whole world contributed to?
> Is that correct?
No, it is completely wrong.
Sun owned the copyright of the code (as a consequence of StarDivision
uch as the
> entire 99% other percent own.
>
> Patents and deeds transfer ownership from the public to
> the private domain, and ownership transfers wealth from
> non owners.
>
> IANAL
>
>
> On Tue, 4/18/17, toki <toki.kant.
transfer ownership from the public to
the private domain, and ownership transfers wealth from
non owners.
IANAL
On Tue, 4/18/17, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] i have questions about licensing in
libre
On 04/17/2017 09:01 AM, nasrin khaksar wrote:
> i heard sometimes that openoffice license is license of oracle company.
Oracle purchased Sun. That purchase included the trademarks, copyrights,
and other intellectual property rights held by OpenOffice.org.
After a couple of years, Oracle donated
hi tom.
thanks so much for your great informations.
i learned many useful things from it and i appreciate you and pray for you.
i heard sometimes that openoffice license is license of oracle company.
is it true?
i love gpl mpl and lgpl license best and they are very close to my
ideas and beliefs.
Hi :)
Just my opinion and i might be wrong in some aspects but hopefully i've got
enough correct to give you a rough idea. :)
The OpenOffice license has changed quite a bit over the years. LibreOffice
is closer to the original - and is aiming to be something like the Creative
Commons ones, ie
hello every one.
i appreciate if someone explane for me license agreement and terms of
use for libreoffice and its difference with openoffice!
i remember that i wanted to study it, but it was extremely long
specially with inclusion of thirdparthy terms and use like java, some
font manufacturers
