Hi All,
This is my kannel sms gateway architecture:
*BBox--SQLBox---SMSBox---Multiple Fake SMSC's*
And this is my kannel status:
-
Status: running, uptime 1d 0h 26m 44s
WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued)
, 2010 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
Nikkos,
no my application is as simple php script which sends only once.it sends
to
10 numbers.for some numbers request is added twice and rest with one.
Br
Daf
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them
,
Nikos - (not Nikkos)
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
Nikkos,
no my application is as simple php script which sends only once.it sends
to
10 numbers.for some
. It doesn't prove
anyting,
except that you have sent twice the same SMS.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi Nikkos,
Thanks again for ur time
Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them twice. If in doubt
check max detail smsbox logs.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
yes u r right
logs.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi
yes u r right is sb log.
i wonder when i sent once why does it goes 2 times.does any wrong
configuration
. Post relevant portions if you get
any
problems.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi nikkos,
just to add more operator says that kannel is senindg
This is not bb access log, but smsbox access log. It doesn't prove anyting,
except that you have sent twice the same SMS.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Br
Daf
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/kannel-performance-tp29914621p29914621.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-allow-ip = *.*.*.*
group = sms-service
keyword = default
get-url = http://mysite.com/url.php;
max-messages = 0
omit-empty = true
catch-all = true
keyword=default
Br
Daf
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/kannel-performance-tp29914621p29914696.html
Sent from
keyword=default
Br
Daf
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/kannel-performance-tp29914621p29914621.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
...@gmail.com
To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set
log-level to 0.
sangprabv
sangpr...@gmail.com
http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo
during tests?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com
To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set
. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com
To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
It would be helpful if you provide us
to spool.
Describe test conditions. Were all of your smsc active during tests?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com
To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
portions if you get any
problems.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: kannel performance
Hi nikkos,
just to add more operator says that kannel is senindg submit_sm for same
number
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Rene Kluwen; brett skinner; Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Currently I apply bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox and use mysql as my dlr engine. On
Delll R710 Quadcore 2.2 Intel Xeon 16GB RAM it usually reduce to 5GB available
memory in just 6 days and must
Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com; kannel users
users@kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Yeah I understand that. But when the there is no traffic. Kannel doesn't
release the cached
oficin@
-Original Message-
From: brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com
Sender: users-boun...@kannel.org
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:13:54
To: Usersusers@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Thanks for the extra information. What was the motivation for using
:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is
painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables.
While InnoDB would theoretically be the best option, MyIsam performs quite
better in this case.
Regards,
Alex
...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is
painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables.
While InnoDB would theoretically be the best option
...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel. Users@Kannel.Org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is
painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables.
While InnoDB would theoretically
server.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com
To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from
: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com
To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ;
us...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Brett,
The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is
painfully slow on InnoDB
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs
time. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space
vs time. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
alejandro.guerri
...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On
Behalf Of *brett skinner
*Sent:* Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56
*To:* Alejandro Guerrieri
*Cc:* Users
*Subject:* Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time
: Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56
To: Alejandro Guerrieri
Cc: Users
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Thanks for your feedback.
Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs
time. :)
Regards,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri
for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default
service for MO's I got:
MO's: 1400 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s
MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: ha...@aeon.pk
To: kannel users
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 4:22 PM
Subject: Kannel performance
- Original Message -
From: brett skinner
To: Nikos Balkanas
Cc: ha...@aeon.pk ; kannel users
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos
Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you
were running and your setup
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos,
Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on
high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I
even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still
Try valgrind in linux.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com
To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Cc: brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com; kannel users
users@kannel.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance
the traffic is gone.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message - From: sangprabv
To: brett skinner
Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi Nikos,
Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating
Hi,
I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking,
especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple
smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the
front-end talking to SMSC is the main bearerbox. What is the max speed that
could
:22 PM
Subject: Kannel performance benchmarking
Hi,
I am interested to know about the kannel performance benchmarking,
especially in terms of speed (msgs/sec), MO or MT. I assume that multiple
smsboxes does not have any effect over kannel performance, since the
front-end talking to SMSC
Hi
After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3
times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute.
Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about
10-15 requests in process and
13-16 free idle workers all the time.
Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me
Hi
After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3
times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute.
Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about
10-15 requests in process and
13-16 free idle workers all the time.
Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections and im sending 20 000 SMS per
connection
and kannel receives them in speed 2000 SMS/sec per connection and stores the
messages in Kannel buffer.
Now i have Apache2 server with PHP scripts that do the SMS
or nginx).
3. Check if kannel uses keepalives for HTTP based services (I'm not sure
if it's possible).
Also question: are both kannel and apache running on the same server?
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com wrote:
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake
or not!
Hope it helps
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mercredi 13 février 2008 04:55
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Kannel performance
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com schrieb:
Hi
Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc.
I have set-up three fake connections and im sending 20 000 SMS per
connection
and kannel receives them in speed 2000 SMS/sec per connection and stores
the
messages in Kannel buffer.
Now i have Apache2
Michael Bochkaryov schrieb:
Hi!
First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else.
Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning):
1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts.
2. Try to use some
Can you share your conf files for kannel and apache so we can help you test?
/Garth
On Feb 13, 2008 3:32 PM, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Bochkaryov schrieb:
Hi!
First try to test only apache performance without kannel.
At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or
I am using kannel cvs-20040621, when I configure I see
checking working pthreadsno -- please see attache file
I was able to compile kannel though, and I'm using cimd2 protocol to service
transactions and send sms push messages. But I'm experiencing a low
throughput of 5sms/sec or worst to
44 matches
Mail list logo
