Re: kannel performance

2010-10-11 Thread Nikos Balkanas
, 2010 8:38 AM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi Nikkos, no my application is as simple php script which sends only once.it sends to 10 numbers.for some numbers request is added twice and rest with one. Br Daf Nikos Balkanas wrote: Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-11 Thread dafodil
, Nikos - (not Nikkos) - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:38 AM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi Nikkos, no my application is as simple php script which sends only once.it sends to 10 numbers.for some

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-10 Thread dafodil
. It doesn't prove anyting, except that you have sent twice the same SMS. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi Nikkos, Thanks again for ur time

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-10 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Nothing wrong with kannel. Your application sends them twice. If in doubt check max detail smsbox logs. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi yes u r right

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-10 Thread dafodil
logs. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 3:52 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi yes u r right is sb log. i wonder when i sent once why does it goes 2 times.does any wrong configuration

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-09 Thread dafodil
. Post relevant portions if you get any problems. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi nikkos, just to add more operator says that kannel is senindg

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
This is not bb access log, but smsbox access log. It doesn't prove anyting, except that you have sent twice the same SMS. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:17 AM Subject: Re: kannel performance

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread dafodil
Hi to add more i m using svn-r4845. Br daf dafodil wrote: Hi List, Good Day. While stress testing with kannel i found the follwing.i was trying to send 10 k sms through HTTP/sendsms. storage internal queued grows to 230. kannel.store size keeps growing and now it seems to be

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread Willy Mularto
It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set log-level to 0. sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:54 PM, dafodil wrote: Hi List, Good Day. While stress testing with kannel i found the follwing.i was trying to

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread Nikos Balkanas
...@gmail.com To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set log-level to 0. sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread dafodil
during tests? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance It would be helpful if you provide us your detailed log. Please set

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread dafodil
. Were all of your smsc active during tests? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance It would be helpful if you provide us

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread dafodil
to spool. Describe test conditions. Were all of your smsc active during tests? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com To: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 5:55 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance

Re: kannel performance

2010-10-08 Thread Nikos Balkanas
portions if you get any problems. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: dafodil neo.tu...@yahoo.com To: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM Subject: Re: kannel performance Hi nikkos, just to add more operator says that kannel is senindg submit_sm for same number

RE: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-12 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: Rene Kluwen; brett skinner; Users Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Currently I apply bearerbox-sqlbox-smsbox and use mysql as my dlr engine. On Delll R710 Quadcore 2.2 Intel Xeon 16GB RAM it usually reduce to 5GB available memory in just 6 days and must

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread brett skinner
Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Cc: brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com; kannel users users@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Yeah I understand that. But when the there is no traffic. Kannel doesn't release the cached

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread alejandro . guerrieri
oficin@ -Original Message- From: brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com Sender: users-boun...@kannel.org Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:13:54 To: Usersusers@kannel.org Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Hi Nikos Thanks for the extra information. What was the motivation for using

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread Nikos Balkanas
:21 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Brett, The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables. While InnoDB would theoretically be the best option, MyIsam performs quite better in this case. Regards, Alex

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread brett skinner
...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Brett, The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables. While InnoDB would theoretically be the best option

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel. Users@Kannel.Org Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Brett, The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is painfully slow on InnoDB for moderately big tables. While InnoDB would theoretically

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
server. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Brett, The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread brett skinner
: alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com To: brett skinner ; users-boun...@kannel.org ; us...@kannel.users@Kannel.Org Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Brett, The DLR engine uses SELECT COUNT(*) from the admin interface, which is painfully slow on InnoDB

RE: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: Users Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Thanks for your feedback. Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs time. :) Regards, On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread sangprabv
To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: Users Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Thanks for your feedback. Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs time. :) Regards, On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri alejandro.guerri

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] *On Behalf Of *brett skinner *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56 *To:* Alejandro Guerrieri *Cc:* Users *Subject:* Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Thanks for your feedback. Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time

RE: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-10 Thread Rene Kluwen
: Tuesday, 10 August, 2010 11:56 To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: Users Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Thanks for your feedback. Guess it is the age old tao of computer science. Space vs Time, always space vs time. :) Regards, On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-09 Thread sangprabv
Hi Nikos, Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still Kannel eat the memory :( sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
- Original Message - From: brett skinner To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: ha...@aeon.pk ; kannel users Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:42 PM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Hi Nikos Out of curiosity can you go into more detail regarding what hardware you were running and your setup

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Hi Nikos, Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating the memory on high load traffics. I always need to restart the box to get more memory. I even give 3 on /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but still

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Try valgrind in linux. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Cc: brett skinner tatty.dishcl...@gmail.com; kannel users users@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:35 AM Subject: Re: Kannel performance

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-09 Thread sangprabv
the traffic is gone. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: sangprabv To: brett skinner Cc: Nikos Balkanas ; kannel users Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:59 PM Subject: Re: Kannel performance benchmarking Hi Nikos, Do you experience memory problem? In my case Kannel is eating

Re: Kannel performance benchmarking

2010-08-08 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, I have run some benchmarking for a client using fakesmpp. Using the default service for MO's I got: MO's: 1400 SMS/s MT + DLRs (internal): 747 SMS/s MT + DLRs (MySql): 434 SMS/s BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: ha...@aeon.pk To: kannel users Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010

Re: Kannel performance

2008-02-14 Thread Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com
Hi After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3 times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute. Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about 10-15 requests in process and 13-16 free idle workers all the time. Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me

Re: Kannel performance

2008-02-14 Thread Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com
Hi After adding eaccelerator to my server, i got speed boost about 2-3 times, now its about 1500 SMS/minute. Checking /server-status under heavy load i see that apache has about 10-15 requests in process and 13-16 free idle workers all the time. Kannel keep-alive has been switched off by me

Re: Kannel performance

2008-02-13 Thread Michael Bochkaryov
Hi! First try to test only apache performance without kannel. At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else. Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning): 1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts. 2. Try to use some lightweight HTTP daemon (lighttpd or

RE: Kannel performance

2008-02-13 Thread info.ubichip
Hello, Could you be more precise on the test environnement? Are you using mysql in both? It could depend as well how you are coding your database request. If you are asking for all the fields of each record or not Many things to explain before we could advice if the issue is from kannel or

Re: Kannel performance

2008-02-13 Thread Stipe Tolj
Illimar Reinbusch - Telejazz.com schrieb: Hi Im testing Kannel performance using fakesmsc. I have set-up three fake connections and im sending 20 000 SMS per connection and kannel receives them in speed 2000 SMS/sec per connection and stores the messages in Kannel buffer. Now i have Apache2

Re: Kannel performance

2008-02-13 Thread Stipe Tolj
Michael Bochkaryov schrieb: Hi! First try to test only apache performance without kannel. At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or something else. Some ideas (mostly about apache and php tuning): 1. Use eaccelerator to increase performance of PHP scripts. 2. Try to use some

Re: Kannel performance

2008-02-13 Thread Garth Patil
Can you share your conf files for kannel and apache so we can help you test? /Garth On Feb 13, 2008 3:32 PM, Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Bochkaryov schrieb: Hi! First try to test only apache performance without kannel. At least you'll be sure if it's apache+php problem or