Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-29 Thread John Casey
If you can't reproduce this problem using version 2.0.9, but can reproduce it (a couple times) using RC11, please file a jira issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG I'll need you to re-run the build using RC11 and the -X command-line option, to produce debug output, then capture that

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-29 Thread Geoffrey Wiseman
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:25 AM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you can't reproduce this problem using version 2.0.9, but can reproduce it (a couple times) using RC11, please file a jira issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG That's the situation, yeah -- it's fine in 2.0.9

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-28 Thread John Casey
Are you running this build in hudson, or in some sort of modified maven environment? Ravi Luthra wrote: I don't know what this means: [WARNING] WARNING This Maven runtime contains a LifecycleExecutor component with an incomplete configuration. LifecycleExecutor

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-28 Thread Ravi Luthra
Yes it was inside Hudson. I just tested in Netbeans using external Maven, and the warnings are not there. On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:37 AM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you running this build in hudson, or in some sort of modified maven environment? Ravi Luthra wrote: I don't

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-28 Thread Geoffrey Wiseman
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:15 PM, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi again, One bug was identified in 2.0.10-RC10 last Friday night. This release candidate addresses that issue. You can find it here:

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-28 Thread John Casey
Hudson is actually the use case for which I wrote that warning. The problem is, the DefaultLifecycleExecutor component was modified in the latest round of development, and now has a couple new component dependencies, or requirements. Since Hudson extends this component implementation directly

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-27 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi John, I found something, but I can't ensure it is caused by 2.0.10-RC11. I have a Maven plug-in that extends the lifecycle and adds a new kind of package. It also uses some Ant tasks. When I build the plug-in with 2.0.10-RC* (I tried with RC1, RC2 and RC11) the build works. But when I try

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-27 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi John, I compared the contents of the artifacts generated by 2.0.9 and 2.0.10-RC11 and they are different. The latter doesn't have the Ant build file and has a different plug-in descriptor. Another difference is the version of maven-plugin-plugin. Maven 2.0.9 uses 2.4.1 and Maven

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-27 Thread Ravi Luthra
I don't know what this means: [WARNING] WARNING This Maven runtime contains a LifecycleExecutor component with an incomplete configuration. LifecycleExecutor class: org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutorInterceptor Missing component requirement:

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-27 Thread Stephen Coy
://www.nabble.com/-PLEASE-TEST--Maven-2.0.10-RC11-tp19150906p19192050.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-26 Thread Peter Horlock
Well, my issue concerning the compiler seems to have been solved with RC11 - the entire build is working now. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that I am setting the compiler version by using a property: plugin artifactIdmaven-compiler-plugin/artifactId

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-26 Thread Daniel Kulp
RC11 is looking pretty good to me. I've built several things with it, re-setup my eclipse workspaces from fresh checkouts (eclipse:eclipse), etc... Haven't done a deploy yet (that's next), but everything else is looking pretty good to me. Performance is also excellent. My test case

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-26 Thread John Casey
Great to hear. Thanks for checking. -john Peter Horlock wrote: Well, my issue concerning the compiler seems to have been solved with RC11 - the entire build is working now. Maybe it had something to do with the fact that I am setting the compiler version by using a property:

[PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-25 Thread John Casey
Hi again, One bug was identified in 2.0.10-RC10 last Friday night. This release candidate addresses that issue. You can find it here: http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC11/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC11/ Please give this a spin when you get a chance, and

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC11

2008-08-25 Thread John Casey
Well, looks like I lost track of a few issues that came up with RC10. I'll work on addressing those issues, and probably follow up with an RC12 if we find bugs. -john John Casey wrote: Hi again, One bug was identified in 2.0.10-RC10 last Friday night. This release candidate addresses that