Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-10-01 Thread Tristan Cebulla
Dennis Lundberg-2 wrote: Now on to the first question for all users out there: Which of the numbered items above needs more work? Please be either concrete with examples like: option A for goal B in plugin C is really bad or give more general thoughts that are valid for all plugins

Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-10-01 Thread Tristan Cebulla
Tristan Cebulla wrote: Stupid trying out can be very tedious and I don't want to sit eight hours every day long testing options/parameters to get it work properly ;) Regards, Tristan Cebulla Just to correct my last post: it was not intended to sound rigorous, I'm just looking for

RE: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-10-01 Thread Brian E. Fox
The mojo project has mailing lists (http://mojo.codehaus.org/mail-lists.html) for those projects. -Original Message- From: Tristan Cebulla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 9:55 AM To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was

Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-10-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Tristan Cebulla wrote: Dennis Lundberg-2 wrote: Now on to the first question for all users out there: Which of the numbered items above needs more work? Please be either concrete with examples like: option A for goal B in plugin C is really bad or give more general thoughts that are valid

Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-10-01 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi, the dashboard plugin is still snapshot and reside in the mojo sandbox. It not yet being released. Raphaël 2007/10/1, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The mojo project has mailing lists (http://mojo.codehaus.org/mail-lists.html) for those projects. -Original Message- From:

RE: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-09-30 Thread Jeff Jensen
-Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:41 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard) [snip] 5.1 and 5.2 are frustrating because they often have just enough info to

Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-09-28 Thread Lee Meador
2.1 and 2.2 are often non-useful. Examples that don't show the groupId tag can be confusing. Maybe that's just me but the artifactId in the example isn't enough. I think it has something to do with plugins moving around from codehaus to maven to apache and such. Sometimes there are example of

Re: Improving the documentation of plugins (was maven is hard)

2007-09-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Lee Meador wrote: 2.1 and 2.2 are often non-useful. Examples that don't show the groupId tag can be confusing. Maybe that's just me but the artifactId in the example isn't enough. I think it has something to do with plugins moving around from codehaus to maven to apache and such. Yes I