Hi Marcel,
No official news at this point because we are not ready to announce
anything officially yet. We are going to submit a proposal to the
incubator PMC at the end of this week and we'll take it from there.
Let me know if you have more questions.
Cheers.
-Omar
When will there be some official news about how the donation of ADF Faceswill be integrated in MyFaces?
I am also interested in this. And what its relation to e.g. Struts-Shale is
Has anyone heard of any progress on the ADF Faces donation? Jacobis logs mentions looking for a name so Cherokee is not final either? How about Apache Sundance *) since waiting for it is sort of self-inflicted torture? :-)
*) native american ritual, google it up
And somebody know what will be happened with current myfaces, when
cherokee be on apache incubators?
thanks
On 1/16/06, Nicklas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone heard of any progress on the ADF Faces donation? Jacobis logs
mentions looking for a name so Cherokee
is not final
Hi Matthias,
Does the book have some good examples of building components that are
based on child components, e.g. a PhoneNumber component with 3
InputText child components?
-KenOn 12/16/05, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: The book is cool, I have read it already ;)On 12/16/05,
http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=947seems to have some sort of schedule: The plan for the next steps with Cherokee as explained by John Fallows and Jonas Jacobi is as follows:
Christmas 2005 - downloads available of binaries and source code from Apache Incubator New Year 2006 - Subversion
Yes,
found the same information inside of Matt Raible's blog.
-Matthias
PS: The book is cool, I have read it already ;)
On 12/16/05, Nicklas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=947
seems to have some sort of schedule:
The plan for the next steps with
That's already a problem with the Tobago component set.
Or, to get more precise, even within the MyFaces component set we have
overlap - look at t:tree and t:tree2.
We'll still try to workout a solution so that users are not
overwhelmed with choice - but, right, choice is not categorically a
bad
Martin Marinschek wrote:
That's already a problem with the Tobago component set.
Or, to get more precise, even within the MyFaces component set we have
overlap - look at t:tree and t:tree2.
We'll still try to workout a solution so that users are not
overwhelmed with choice - but, right,
The Oracle stuff will likely be in the incubator for a while. I
definitely agree that there should be a single subproject that hosts
the components. Tobago is a little different but there is some
overlap and that needs to be worked on.
I think the big priority now is Maven, a new release and
I think the big priority now is Maven, a new release and incorporatingTobago into MyFaces.Once we've absorbed Tobago, the next logical
step seems to be the ADF donation.There is a lot of work to do thereto bring the ADF stuff into alignment with MyFaces but Oracle has saidthey are willing and able
The goal is that cherokee works with all jsf implementations, if you mean that
by standalone that is..
Mvgr,
Martin
Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
I think the big priority now is Maven, a new release and incorporating
Tobago into MyFaces. Once we've absorbed Tobago, the next logical
The original message is copied here:
http://www.jroller.com/page/RickHigh?entry=oracle_adf_added_to_myfaces
Saludos.
Guillermo.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Martes, 13 de Diciembre de 2005 08:19 p.m.
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: MyFaces
Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 12:52
An: 'MyFaces Discussion'
Betreff: RE: MyFaces Cherokee
The original message is copied here:
http://www.jroller.com/page/RickHigh?entry=oracle_adf_added_to_myfaces
Saludos.
Guillermo.
-Original Message-
From
Of course it would be interested to see which components have been included in the declassified list. They will probably have to keep something for themselves in order to keep selling ADF faces for themselves (their own data-binding-controls?)
On 12/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't see the blog entry, but the donation was officially announced at
JavaPolis by Jonas Jacobi, John Fallows and Martin Marinschek and at apachecon
in San Diego (by someone else :)..
Besides the contribution, I think Jonas and John will be a great addition to
the Apache / Apache MyFaces
I can't wait for the Maven 2 plugin (it was written on the blog). I
wonder what you can do with it since Maven 2 right now is my favorite
Java goodies and I am working on a JSF application :)
On 12/14/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see the blog entry, but the donation
I wouldn't be the one being able to do an official announcement, but
as the official announcement has already been made ;) ...
Yes, Oracle will open-source ADF Faces under the name of Apache
Cherokee - if it gets through the incubator, which will of course need
some time, and which will depend on
Oracle will open source 104 components of the ADF faces component set- there are still some more not being open sourced, but they might
follow if the first donation is as successful as we suspect. In fact,I doubt you'll miss any functionality in JSF world with the combinedcomponent sets of
Umm. Where did the fresh entry about Oracle donating 100+ JSF components from ADF Faces to the MyFaces Cherokee-project go? There was a mentioning that the offical documents hadn't been signed yet. Did anyone else see it before it vanished?
On 12/13/05, Nicklas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably some legal issues remain to be solved. Let's wait to see what happens,
Regards,
Bruno
2005/12/14, Nicklas Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Umm. Where did the fresh entry about Oracle donating 100+ JSF components
from ADF Faces to the MyFaces Cherokee-project go? There was a mentioning
Yep, it was there. And now it's gone. Presumably the few hundred people
there at the presentation also saw it.
I'm guessing it's just a matter of Oracle wanting the initial
announcement to be from their PR department rather than on a blog.
Personally, I'd prefer to hear it direct from someone
Well, if the announcement was made to 700+ people then they are probably not going to back out of it.In a reply to a comment (now also gone) it was mentioned that incubating the project should probablynot take long and we should hopefully see something by the holidays.
There seemed to be other
23 matches
Mail list logo
