On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
RW A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results
RW you have to extend your internal network and maintain it.
On 18.09.14 22:09,
18.09.2014, 22:58, Bob Proulx kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
haproxy is just a small app capable of working as a proxy for http
or plain tcp connections. HA.
What are you using for the Bayes database on the distributed compute
farm? (Just curious...)
Bob
MySQL /MariaDB 5.5
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:37:45 +0200,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
RW A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results
RW you have to extend your internal network and maintain it.
Ian Do
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:09:23 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100,
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
RW A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best
RW results you have to
Am 19.09.2014 um 13:44 schrieb RW:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:09:23 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100,
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
RW A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW of them have already been spam filtered, and to get
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 13:47 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.09.2014 um 13:44 schrieb RW:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 22:09:23 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:43:49 +0100,
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
RW A lot of people don't put mailing lists through
RW A lot of people don't put mailing lists through Spamassassin, most
RW of them have already been spam filtered, and to get the best results
RW you have to extend your internal network and maintain it.
Matus no... they do not filter mail from mailing lists through SA. it
Matus is setting in
Am 19.09.2014 um 14:42 schrieb Martin Gregorie:
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 13:47 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Most DNSBL tests are done on the last relay into the internal network.
I'm not say this should be done, I'm saying that it's one reason why
scanning mailing list can be more trouble than
Hi,
still playing with sa-learn. If I feed sa-learn do I have to strip the
last Received: header which is the Received header for my own MDA
(imap-backend) before piping the message into sa-learn?
Return-Path: spam...@whatever.com
--- strip this header? -- Received: from
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
still playing with sa-learn. If I feed sa-learn do I have to strip the
last Received: header which is the Received header for my own MDA
(imap-backend) before piping the message into sa-learn?
No, that shouldn't matter. The common bits will be
I caught wind from a post on ddos-protection.org that Spamhaus is getting
DDoS attacked again. We are getting timeouts to spamhaus servers
intermittently. One test scan will work properly with no timeouts, the next
will say deadline shrunk, then the calling callback/abort on key and
spam will flow
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:27 PM, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, francis picabia wrote:
Hello,
We just received the most authentic looking phishing I've seen. It was
professionally written, included a nice signature in the style used by
people at my workplace,
Seeing spam with URLs in new TLDs, (EG blah.link) time to update
RegistrarBoundaries.
If this silly chase continues at this rate, is it worth trying
to come up with some other method of doing that job?
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
dbfunk (at)
On 9/19/2014 4:23 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Seeing spam with URLs in new TLDs, (EG blah.link) time to update
RegistrarBoundaries.
If this silly chase continues at this rate, is it worth trying
to come up with some other method of doing that job?
We are working on solutions expected for the
On 09/19/2014 10:23 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Seeing spam with URLs in new TLDs, (EG blah.link) time to update
RegistrarBoundaries.
If this silly chase continues at this rate, is it worth trying
to come up with some other method of doing that job?
On 19 Sep 2014, at 09:06 , Marcus Schopen li...@localguru.de wrote:
still playing with sa-learn. If I feed sa-learn do I have to strip the
last Received: header which is the Received header for my own MDA
(imap-backend) before piping the message into sa-learn?
All you need to do is make sure
16 matches
Mail list logo