Many thanks to the Tomcat team!!
I have one simple question. The mention of microseconds instead of milliseconds
in the release notes is that the resolution for logging processing time for the
request (%D) in the access logs? If so will it be available for Windows OS?
Thanks and keep up the
Never mind I figured out it has nothing to do with logging but some sort of CPU
metric.
Regards,
-Tony
--- On Wed, 2/13/13, Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.27 released
To: Tomcat Developers List d
Hi All,
I have noticed since switching to Tomcat 7.0.33 64-bit that sometimes it just
stops functioning with no errors and no events in windows to give me a reason
why. It seems to do it once every couple of weeks.
Has anyone experienced that? I am thinking next time to hookup visualvm to see
: Thursday, December 20, 2012, 1:05 PM
2012/12/20 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Hi All,
I have noticed since switching to Tomcat 7.0.33 64-bit that sometimes it just
stops functioning with no errors and no events in windows to give me a reason
why. It seems to do it once every couple of weeks
7.0.33 just stops without any errors...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Thursday, December 20, 2012, 1:05 PM
2012/12/20 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Hi All,
I have noticed since switching to Tomcat 7.0.33 64-bit that sometimes it just
stops functioning with no errors
.
-Tony
--- On Tue, 12/4/12, Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Suggestion for improving Tomcat startup performance...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, December 4, 2012, 3:41 PM
2012/12/5 Tony
: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
Subject: RE: Suggestion for improving Tomcat startup performance...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, December 4, 2012, 3:45 PM
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Suggestion for improving Tomcat startup
Ok I found a Engine reference in the server.xml for the catalina service. I
am guessing that the attribute should go in there somewhere. I will look at the
engine documentation to see how to add it.
Thanks,
-Tony
--- On Tue, 12/4/12, Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Tony
wrote:
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
Subject: RE: Suggestion for improving Tomcat startup performance...
To: Tomcat Users List (users@tomcat.apache.org) users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, December 4, 2012, 4:32 PM
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com
: Monday, November 26, 2012, 12:01 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 11/24/12 2:41 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com] Subject: How do I
know if native plugin in use?
I downloaded and installed TC 7.0.33 64-bit
Hi All,
I noticed from my logs that when upgrading from 7.0.27 to 7.0.33 my startup
time went from 19.8 to 17.5 seconds. Is there some tuning I can try to improve
the startup?
I am not sure how much it improved my web service requests yet. It has 5 web
services and a blog app.
Regards,
, 12:52 PM
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: TC 7.0.33 startup performance...
Is there some tuning I can try to improve the startup?
You can try playing with the startStopThreads attribute on Host:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/host.html
If you have
Hi Alex,
Typically I have found the first issue is the response time of the database
queries. Threads and sockets will start to reach a limit when this happens.
Then after that is looked at then the next issue will be understanding what is
really possible with the system. Just going from EJB
Many thanks to the Tomcat team for all thier hard work!
-Tony
--- On Wed, 11/21/12, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
From: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
Subject: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 released
To: Tomcat Announce List annou...@tomcat.apache.org
Cc: annou...@apache.org, Tomcat Users
Many thanks Thomas for making it available! Do we get it signed or something?
lol
-Tony
--- On Wed, 11/14/12, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
From: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
Subject: ApacheCon EU 2012 Talks
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, November 14,
Hi All,
I need to do a redirect from one Tomcat instance to another on the same
physical server. That should be possible correct?
Regards,
-Tony
--- On Wed, 10/31/12, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
From: André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com
Subject: Re: Rediect to another Tomcat instance...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2012, 3:02 PM
Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi All,
I need to do a redirect from one
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: Rediect to another Tomcat instance...
I have a blog app that I want to isolate to another Tomcat instance and
leave my web services on my exsting one. Can I not run the second Tomcat
service on port 82 for example and redirect
question...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 7:38 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 9/18/12 7:10 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks for the heads up about the memory issue. I looked over the
release notes before I posted here
Hi All,
Has anyone tried the newest Tomcat release and noticed any performance
differences? My startup is 20 seconds but it is not often I restart my Tomcat
server due to it being so stable but I am interested in any performance gain
when it is executing and a request is going through the
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 9/18/12 1:58 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Has anyone tried the newest Tomcat release and noticed any
performance differences? My startup is 20 seconds but it is not
often I restart my Tomcat server due to it being so stable but I am
interested in any performance gain
@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2012, 3:29 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 9/18/12 4:55 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Christopher,
I have not started using 7.0.30 yet and I do have connection pools
setup on startup I believe 5 or 6 of them which may account
Hi All,
I looked at the release notes and there was nearly nothing there. So
justification to update was impossible. Oracle needs to realize that releases
with just one security and one time clock change makes it impossible to explain
to anyone why we need to update an Enterprise.
Just my
like Oracle (I loathe it most days); just making the point that
they were REALLY good about jumping on this issue so quickly.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 10:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Java 6u35
List users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, July 22, 2012, 7:17 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 7/21/12 3:11 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Lots of time I apply best practices that I learn over time or are
recommended by experts (Like Mark
I do it at the OS level via the adaptor properties for windows. If your network
does not support IPv6 I would disable it else you will get errors in your logs
about IPv6 for like say DHCP assignment.
Regards,
-Tony
--- On Sun, 7/22/12, k9...@operamail.com k9...@operamail.com wrote:
From:
of doing things.
Best Regards,
Tony Anecito
JavaOne 2010 Dukes Award winner for Innovation
JavaOne 2010 Future of Java Winner
Currently #1 App Store Download for 3D Mapping and #2 for video app
--- On Sat, 7/21/12, David kerber dcker...@verizon.net wrote:
From: David kerber dcker...@verizon.net
Hi All,
Does anyone know the location of the default jvm settings for Tomcat 7 if the
JAVA_OPTS env variable for windows is not specified?
Also, does anyone know what the recommended settings to start with for say
Oracle 64-bit jvm and Tomcat 7? For -Xss it used to be -Xss126k for 32-bit jvm
, 2012, 1:05 PM
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Location of Tomcat 7 jvm defualt settings...
Does anyone know the location of the default jvm settings for Tomcat 7
if the JAVA_OPTS env variable for windows is not specified?
There are none. Tomcat uses whatever the JVM
: Location of Tomcat 7 jvm defualt settings...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Friday, July 20, 2012, 2:53 PM
On 20/07/2012 21:42, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Charles I have found documention for all the below from the
Tomcat group but seemed somewhat outdated. Mark Thomas's name
Hi All,
Is it possible to run Tomcat in the same jvm as JBoss and if so how to do that?
I am using the latest versions of both and usually run in separate jvms but
want to see if it can they can run together in the same jvm so I can compare
response times for both configurations. Since JBoss
with an EJB container...
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Monday, June 18, 2012, 10:07 AM
2012/6/18 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Hi All,
Since JBoss is usually several minor versions behind on it's embedded Tomcat
server I usually run them in different jvms so I can
Subject: Re: Running Tomcat in a jvm with an EJB container...
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
2012/6/18 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Hi All,
Since JBoss is usually several minor versions behind on it's embedded
Tomcat server I usually run them in different jvms so I can use the latest
Tony,
On 5/29/12 11:17 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
For TC 7 how long do servlets stay in memory if not invoked by a
client or another servlet? How does one control the length of time?
Is the there a config setting in a file somewhere?
I don't believe Tomcat does any auto-unloading of servlets once
...@apache.org wrote:
From: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
Subject: Re: For TC 7 servlets stay in memory how long?
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2012, 11:10 AM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/05/2012 18:05, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks
kerber dcker...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: Performance for many small requests
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2011, 8:40 AM
On 8/31/2011 12:25 PM, Tony Anecito
wrote:
Hi David,
You need to not only look at the container but it's
configuration
Two things to think about in addition to the recommendation Chuck mentioned.
1. For small requests having a large new generation in the heap helps. This
helps with the short term objects in the heap to get collected.
2. Lots of small disk IO may slow you down also. Remember http is synchronous
, I always revaluate my design/implementation every 6 months or so and make
changes based on lessons learned. Also, do not be afraid to try something new :]
Regards,
Tony Anecito
Founder/President
MyUniPortal
http://www.myuniportal.com
2010 JavaOne Dukes Award winner (Yes I am using Tomcat :])
2010
Does TC 4.1 have a logging parimeter for response time?
Thanks,
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 5:10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues...
Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead
project seemed like
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thu, June 30, 2011 9:19:49 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues...
2011/6/30 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is
Tomcat
6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's
Hi All,
Does JSTL or Taglib come standard with Tomcat? I was running a load test on
Tomcat and noticed that the processing of the end tag in the taglib was slow
sometimes. I know Apache has taken over the tag lib from jakarta years ago.
I was using a codeprofiler from Wiley.
Thanks,
-Tony
Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead
project seemed like there was no version that supported Tomcat 6.0.x.
I will continue the message thread onto that group thanks for the advice.
I am a tester but the response time was 3-4 seconds.
I have not asked the
21:01, Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com wrote:
As someone mentioned the network can imit you. If your bandwidth
utilization is
at 60% or over you are in trouble since collisions start to become a
serious
issue.
Collisions may or may not be an issue, depending on the exact mode of
operation
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 11:25:35 AM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/13/2011 5:01 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Also, I have measured
: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 3:09:35 PM
Subject: Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/14/2011 3:08 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
From the definitions and discussions
thought about that, but I would think I would be maxing out the cpu
if tomcat's processing were the limit. I'm running only about 8% cpu
usage across all 4 cpu's.
On 3/11/2011 4:23 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi David,
I recently ran performance tests against version 7 and during that whole
Hi David,
I recently ran performance tests against version 7 and during that whole
process
discovered at best for a single instance of Tomcat 7 running on a 6 core AMD
2.8Ghz processor the best I could get running the client on the server and
using
loopback network (Localhost) was around 32K
: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: HttpClient User Discussion httpclient-us...@hc.apache.org
Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 10:49:53 PM
Subject: Re: Slowness of 4.1
Hi Oleg,
Here is some numbers when running TestHttpClient4. I am running from Eclipse
using jdk 1. 6.0.22 and a Aspire 5670 which has
:59, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Chris,
I only reported what I read on this link:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/bhaktimehta/archive/2011/03/01/modjk-and-ejb-webservices-and-glassfish-31
1
Regarding startup I have maybe 6 JAXWS and 1 JAXRS web services and whatever
out
of the box services
@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 1:18:18 PM
Subject: Re: Glashfish release is really fast...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/2/2011 12:02 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Glashfish 3.1 was
released yesterday and its performance is the best I have seen for a J2EE
servlet
Hi Chuck,
You did not see my earlier response where I came to the same conclusion about
the types after looking at some other sites including a wiki. Yes there was
some
confusion but now I am clear that it is compiler dependant as I said earlier.
Thanks,
-Tony
Hi Guys,
Just to distract you from 32-bit vs 64-bit conversation Glashfish 3.1 was
released yesterday and its performance is the best I have seen for a J2EE
servlet container. They reported a 30% + improvement in almost every area and a
less than 4 seconds startup that's even better than
, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Chris I will take a look at it.
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I was
shooting for less than 1msec at Tomcat which I not have done. Now I want to
get
to 100 microseconds. Years ago from an logical architecture standpoint
:03 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
As stated in my message I was using the -server option for the server jvm.
-Tony
My bad; I missed that.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
/1/2011 6:27 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I believe the effect of compression is relative. In other words for a big
program with lots of 64-bit pointers and 64-bit longs it is helps but for
small
programs it does not.
A long in Java is always 64 bits. Those /will/ be faster on a 64-bit
On the wiki Java long is 64-bits not sure what a Long is. So IBM is thinking
C,C++ a long is 32bits which is what the paper meant.
So I as wrong.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wed, March 2
/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 2:57 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size
but
you can compress the address pointers.
+1
Also, if you use JNI and it is 32-bit then you
PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I also use Native APR with Tomcat 7 which eliminates AJP and
supposedly is faster than Apache Web Server
It's probably the same as AWS, as the code is the same :)
http://people.apache.org/~schultz/ApacheCon%20NA%202010/ApacheCon%20NA%202010%20Slides.pdf
f
- -chris
on how much worse things get is based upon how many pointers and
longs are used for 64-bit java that are used.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 12:44:37 PM
Subject: Re: [OT
Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 1:42:37 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to
eliminate
Hi Chris,
I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two
32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of
information it takes two fetches or twice as long on the same hardware.
Depending upon the number of bytes for each data type for
these are marked as [OT]... we have totally hijacked Bruce's
thread. Maybe we should start another.
On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I
was
shooting for less than 1msec at Tomcat which I not have done. Now I want
Message
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:45:39 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:33 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I used
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 3:00:53 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I guess you
Thanks Chuck I agree.
I used to design hardware back in the 80-mid 90's so understand what you are
saying but have not kept up with actual designs since then. I jumped over to
software after that.
I know I simplify some things but hope I still am correct. Feel free to correct
me I will try to
you
see the biggest gains.
If manually you see x seconds then that is the best it will be before you start
tuning.
Gains in code will always be larger than that by configuration tuning unless
logging level is set to high especially for jdbc calls.
Good luck,
Tony Anecito (JavaOne 2010 I am
it to perform well.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 1:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I agree with Charles. I run a performance Testing group for a fortune 50
company
and do alot
to the pointers.
Recommend you stick to 32-bit if your app fits within the memory space for
32-bit. I have heard that 64-bit jvm for version 7 might be faster than 32-bit.
Good Luck,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
might be faster than 32-bit.
Good Luck,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 12:40:43 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
JVM settings should not be the same.
Regards,
-Tony
.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I forgot to mention new versions of Windows are slower than XP. So that would
contribute to your issues. Windows 7 got
Hi All,
When do you think SingleThreadModel will go from deprecated to being gone? I
noticed with Tomcat 7 it is still present so I am assuming Servlet 3.0 api
still
has it present.
Is it true by default all JSP's use it unless otherwise specified?
Thanks,
-Tony
, 2011 1:34:24 PM
Subject: RE: When will SingleThreadModel be removed?
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: When will SingleThreadModel be removed?
When do you think SingleThreadModel will go from
deprecated to being gone?
Not soon enough.
I noticed with Tomcat 7
non-threadsafe) will be great to the casual developer not realizing they put a
ticking timebomb in the container.
Thanks,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thu, February 24, 2011 1:48:49 PM
Subject: Re
- Original Message
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thu, February 24, 2011 2:16:36 PM
Subject: RE: When will SingleThreadModel be removed?
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: When
Okay maybe the best way is to do a form of grep and jarscan. Grep for the
isThreadSafe existance and jarscan for the SingleThreadModel class.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thu, February 24
...@apache.org
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 11:45:29 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18:27, Tony Anecito wrote:
Right now for most of my transactions I get less than 5 microseconds and
around
1.2msec is spent on getting
- Original Message
From: Pid p...@pidster.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 3:39:04 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Mark,
Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send
, February 13, 2011 2:54:53 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 13/02/2011 04:33, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Pid.
Odd though I did a GET with no attachments.
I do return a complex object but that is only the response not the request.
Pid meant that the mailing list strips
Hi Mark,
Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
http://www.myuniportal.com/tomcatjerseyservletprofile.jpg
Best Regards,
Tony Anecito
Founder,
MyUniPortal (2010 JavaOne Duke's Award)
http://www.myuniportal.com
- Original Message
From: Mark Thomas ma
Is there any performance tuning that can be done to Tomcat 7 besides just the
standard jvm arguments?
Regards,
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
/2011 18:14, Tony Anecito wrote:
Is there any performance tuning that can be done to Tomcat 7 besides just the
standard jvm arguments?
95%+ of tuning will need to be done in the app rather than Tomcat. My
recommendation is to get yourself a profiler and go from there.
Mark
Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 12/02/2011 18:27, Tony Anecito wrote:
Right now for most of my transactions I get less than 5 microseconds and
around
1.2msec is spent on getting to and out of Tomcat and out of to/out of the
client
call.
So people were saying look at better parsers or replacing
7...
On 12/02/2011 18:27, Tony Anecito wrote:
Right now for most of my transactions I get less than 5 microseconds and
around
1.2msec is spent on getting to and out of Tomcat and out of to/out of the
client
call.
So people were saying look at better parsers or replacing whatever does
: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
On 2/12/11 10:23 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I attached the screenshot of visualvm showing what I mean.
The list strips attachments...
p
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate
Hi All,
Is it possible to replace xml parsers in Tomcat 7? Which xml parsers are used?
I am just doing some performance testing of Tocat 7.0.8 and wondering. Perhaps
only the APR that comes with Tomcat 7 does the parsing?
I am specifically running some performance tests with Jersey and trying
Hi All,
I want to upgrade from 6.0.20 to 7.0.x but I have APR added to Tomcat now and I
want to keep it that configuration. I heard that Tomcat 7.0.x comes with APR
but
I am not sure of that. Is that true?
Thanks,
-Tony
?
Also, does finalized get called for a servlet when tomcat is done with it?
Maybe I should state the question does
com.sun.jersey.spi.container.servlet.ServletContainer call the resource class
constructor when it is reused?
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec
, 2011 2:52:52 PM
Subject: RE: Jersey Client Call to Tomcat creates new servlet while for Metro
Soap call it does not do that...
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: Jersey Client Call to Tomcat creates new servlet while for Metro
Soap call it does not do that...
I ran
Hi All,
I am a newby to Jersey (1.5) but not Tomcat (6.0.20). I am at a point where
when
I send a complex object from my client program to Tomcat I get this error about
when reading the Message body a reader is not found. The odd thing is I can get
the same complex object just fine back from
: Re: Jersey Tomcat...
2011/1/16 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Hi All,
I am a newby to Jersey (1.5) but not Tomcat (6.0.20). I am at a point where
when
I send a complex object from my client program to Tomcat I get this error
about
when reading the Message body a reader is not found
Hi All,
I noticed with Jersey 1.5 that whenever I execute a Jersey client side request
it creates a new servlet rather than reuse the existing servlet. I know this
because in my constructor for my servlet I send out a message and it is going
to
the Tomcat command console.
In my Web.xml I have
Hi All,
Does Tomcat come with JAX-RS?
Thanks,
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi All,
I was running a load test against Tomcat 6.0.16 and noticed that when the load
test was done the thread count stayed over 600.
Is there some delay for the threads to ramp down internal to Tomcat?
Thanks,
-Tony
After some research I found the tags in the server.xml for controlling this and
will check with someone about the current settings.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users Group users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Fri, December 17, 2010 3
used to
have around 1msec but I think the CPU management and added cpu count caused
that
to happen.
Remember to turn off services you do not need and use NUMA and any other
settings that might help like operand compression for the 64-bit jvm if you use
it.
Regards,
Tony Anecito
Founder/CEO
I will be there since I won one of the JavaOne Duke's Choice awards and was
picked as one of the top 2 Duke Choice Awards and one of the outstanding Java
developers in the I am the future of Java
Regards,
Tony Anecito
Founder/CEO
MyUniportal LLC
http://www.myuniportal.com
- Original
JDK 1.6 comes with visualvm or download the latest release of the tool from
it's
web site.
https://visualvm.dev.java.net/
Good Luck,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: laredotornado laredotorn...@gmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wed, August 18, 2010 12:41:37 PM
Subject: How
- Original Message
From: Pid p...@pidster.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 10:11:39 AM
Subject: Re: APR Tomcat...
On 19/07/2010 22:21, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Pid
First off I get a little red x in the upper left hand corner of the web page
users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 11:53:40 AM
Subject: Re: APR Tomcat...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 7/20/2010 12:35 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Interesting. I saw that when a static file was around 21K or below a dramatic
improvement in recorded time
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
