Title: RE: ipv6 dns server.
Wise or not, that is the
standard. If you are using an ISP that does not support
IPv6, and don't have tunneled IPv6 service,
in most cases, you would not need
to have an IPv6 stack installed on your
node. In that case, the "preferred" IPv6
address returned by
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Monday, January 02, 2006 4:02 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most client computers (DNS resolvers) that support IPv6 will (and should)
use the IPv6 addresses preferentially over IPv4 when both are returned
from the DNS.
With most ISP's not
On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:53 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get tunneled service over existing IPv4 connections anywhere in
the world (even in the US). See www.hexago.com or Hurricane Electric,
among others (not affiliated with either, but have used both).
On Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:16 PM +0100 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, if your ISP doesn't offer the service, even if via a tunnel,
better change to another ISP. There are lots of reliable ISPs today
offering the service, and lots of free transition services.
We have
Heheh.. :) Speakeasy if I recall correctly, just got started in IPv6 core
development at their backbone, but does not have v6 transit yet. They peer
with a few networks, like CW, etc (occaid will be peering with them also
shortly, just need to figure out what exchange point IPs are being used in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Porter
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:28 PM
To: users@ipv6.org
Subject: Re: ipv6 dns server.
On Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:16 PM +0100 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Title: RE: ipv6 dns server.
We've had pretty good luck
with bringing a /48 into a *BSD router/firewall
(using pf), with tunnels from various ISPs
over our basic IPv4 service.
We route a /64 into each of our internal
subnets. Performance is OK.
Note Hurricane Electric will only do /64
via
