Hello Chris,
Here is one example:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/postgresql/postgresql/
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Jun 8, 2017 10:44, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the Edgent project produces two tar.gz files … one for java7
So, they are adding the java version as a suffix to the version of the artifact
… don’t quite know if I really like that solution. I think It would break some
version related automatisms, but it is definitely a safer solution as the
classifier solution. But how would such a build look like?
I don't have computer right now, so I can't check
I believe you can check pom in their repo or ask their mailing list :)
Additional option might me: having version X.a.b.c for java7 and version
Y.a.b.c for java8
Apache Wicket uses such naming ...
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
Hi,
Another question that came up while at my Maven migration task in the Edgent
project.
Justin suggested to prefix all artifactIds with “apache-edgent-“. Having a look
at the Apache Repo it feels like 80% prefix the artifacts with the
“{projectname}-“ , about 10% with “apache-{projectname}”
Hi,
Currently the Edgent project produces two tar.gz files … one for java7 and one
for java8. Now they would like to produce artifacts for Maven-Central.
I’m currently trying to help them with their build by migrating this to maven.
I think that there currently is no clean way to provide both
Perhaps not adding any suffix to the version for the java8 version would be ok
and to add “java7” to the version for the legacy builds would be a good
compromise.
Chris
Am 08.06.17, 11:11 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
So, they are adding the java version as a
I’m using jaxws-maven-plugin to generate some java-files and compile them to
classes. I’m running JDK 8 on my machine but I want the output jars to be
compatible with java 7, I’ve configured the maven-compiler-plugin so all my
other jars are correct but it ’s seems like the jaxws-plugin doesn’t
By default the wsgen target compiles any generated classes as well, which
is typically not how it should be done in a Maven project as the
compilation should be handled by the maven-compile-plugin. But this is due
to wsgen being a tool which is wrapped by the jaxws-maven-plugin. (However,
the
Hi Chistopher,
Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Perhaps not adding any suffix to the version for the java8 version would
> be ok and to add “java7” to the version for the legacy builds would be a
> good compromise.
That's what XStream has done with the last release.
Cheers,
Jörg