,
Kristian Rosenvold,
Zenior AS
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that the parallel provider actually requires correctly
defined junit4/junit3 tests to run, annotate your methods with @Test.
The classic Junit 4 provider would run a large number of tests that
were incorrectly defined according to junit specifications. The
concurrent provider uses
the number of tests executed is correct.
Thanks again,
Paolo
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
Please note that the parallel provider actually requires correctly
defined junit4/junit3 tests to run, annotate your methods with @Test.
The classic Junit 4 provider would run a large number of tests that
were
get a significant speed boost
by switching to jdk 7 ;)
Kristian
Den 12.04.2010 14:05, skrev Paolo Castagna:
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
All your questions should be answered here;
http://incodewetrustinc.blogspot.com/2010/01/run-your-junit-tests-concurrently-with.html
Thanks for the link
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html
perCoreThreadCount is true or false, not a digit. So threadCount=2
and perCoreThreadCount=true gives 16 threads on an 8 core machine.
Kristian
Den 12.04.2010 14:49, skrev Paolo Castagna:
Kristian Rosenvold wrote
This will be fixed real soon, the site plugin needs a minor update.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Kathryn Huxtable
kath...@kathrynhuxtable.org wrote:
Any reason why mvn clean package on the checked out source would yield:
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.1:compile (default-compile) @
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Maven-archiver, version 2.4.1
Maven-archiver is mainly used by plugins to handle packaging.
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/
You should specify the version as a dependency:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.maven/groupId
I'm looking into making some performance improvements with parallel running
of surefire tests and I need a project with stable working
parallel TestNG tests. The project must be public and have stable tests, I
can add external repositories if needed. Anyone know any such project ?
Kristian
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Jar
Plugin, version 2.3.1
This plugin provides the capability to build jars.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Ear
Plugin, version 2.4.2
This version fixed possible corruption/incorrect data issues that can
occur on non-windows machines
due to threading issues. It also adds @threadSafe support for maven3.
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Compiler Plugin, version 2.3.1
This plugin is used to compile the sources of your project.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Resources Plugin, version 2.4.3
This plugin filters non-Java resource files, replacing expressions with
values from the POM or any of the filtering properties files you choose
to configure. Please see the plugin's site for details:
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Install
Plugin, version 2.3.1
The Install Plugin is used during the install phase to add artifact(s)
to the local repository.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-install-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's
I have been running this patch on my CI (including m3 IT's) for quite
some time now, and it works really well here. Obviously, the more the
merrier!
But then again, from a user's perspective this change really adds very
little to the excitement. It's supposed to be a transparent change
without
I think it's a really nice change, don't get me wrong on that ;)
I'm also hoping it'll improve the error handling when something is wrong
with the plexus configuration. As of today there's a fair amount of
guesswork
involved when a change breaks the plexus-configuration, I often end up
Does it fail immediately or does it run the tests first ?
Is the plugin configured with forkedProcessTimeoutInSeconds ?
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
It sounds like the maven3 parallel build feature would help
you out on this,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Parallel+builds+in
+Maven+3.
There is also the -fae option that could be used to proceed even with
failing tests, which also works for serial builds.
As for the
Den 23.09.2010 11:31, skrev Jörg Schaible:
Is it possible that the new code for parallel processing unintentionally
swallows the OOME? Does someone else observe the same behavior?
Are you running with the -T option active ?
Kristian
Den 15.11.2010 21:53, skrev fachhoch:
I use jetty:run to start my application , I wat to do profillng using
JProfiler , please tell me how to integrate JProfiler
That will be something like export
MAVEN_OPTS=-agentpath:/opt/yjp-9.0.4/bin/linux-x86-32/libyjpagent.so
Check out
The way I read your explanation, I am not entirely convinced anything is
being run in parallel; look for the maven-surefire-plugin in your pom
and see if the parallel setting is active.
Much more likely you have static state in your tests that fails when
multiple test methods are being run in the
+0100
Von: Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
An: Maven Users List users@maven.apache.org
Betreff: Re: parallel execution of unit tests
The way I read your explanation, I am not entirely convinced anything is
being run in parallel; look for the maven-surefire-plugin in your pom
Somehow this sounds like the notorious
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXCOMP-149 and the attached
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHARED-148
Upgrade all your plugins to the latest version.
Kristian
Make sure
fr., 03.12.2010 kl. 20.47 +0100, skrev reno:
hi,
today, we encountered a
Works fine on my machine using java 1.6 and maven 3.0.1. I had to remove
the sonar plugin though, because I don't have your database.
Kristian
on., 08.12.2010 kl. 14.05 +0100, skrev Raphael Bossek:
Hi, you can find my simple project as ZIP and Maven3 project at the
following zip download url:
Martin,
Is there an issue for this problem ? surefire 2.7 is about this -- --
close and if there is an issue I can look at it.
Kristian
to., 09.12.2010 kl. 09.09 -0500, skrev Martin Gainty:
Bonjour Remy
i reverted all my builds to use surefire 2.4.2
the introduction of Juice IOC injector
he Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.7
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
The data-files used for producing the reports are written to
target/surefire-reports as each test-class completes. I suppose it
could be possible to script something that uses this knowledge.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.7.1
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
I have looked at this code earlier, and it actually forks *2* shells to
get file attributes when creating any kind of xAR archive.
There is definitely room for improvement here, especially on the posix
implementation. The last time I googled this it
was not as trivial as one could think.
-winterthur.ch
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kristian Rosenvold [mailto:kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Januar 2011 08:40
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Re: why does maven use /bin/sh -c ls -1lna /djb3/... just to get a
file attribute?
I have looked at this code earlier
Den 18.01.2011 17:16, skrev Stadelmann Josef:
Maybe you have another advise for me.
From the general smell of it I would suspect this is somehow related to
your xml parsers/versions or some kind of inappropriate
version mix. I know this is probably not too helpful
Kristian
Den 18.01.2011 18:03, skrev fmeili:
a)
The symptoms you are encountering seem to indicate that you're getting
testng or junit3 in somewhere on your
classpath. As to why this is happening, we'll have to try some detective
work:
The most significant difference between serial and parallel maven
ma., 24.01.2011 kl. 00.19 -0800, skrev fmeili:
Do you have any other idea how I may isolate the problem?
TestNG dependencies can also cause the same behaviour as I described in
my original mail (wrt junit3).
If that fails, there is no other way than to do as I said:
Surefire stores the
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.7.2
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
You,re cutting away so much of the log that it doesn't even show 2.7.1
being run ;)
Maybe
mvn --fail-never --file CSKAutoCommon\pom.xml help:effective-pom
Can provide some insight ?
Kristian
on., 09.02.2011 kl. 08.59 -0700, skrev twilliamso...@oreillyauto.com:
I apologize if this is a
Surefire does not have any official public library apart
from the proposed provider api.
The flurry of surefire activity is about
catching up with a few years of bug backlog, as well as
lifting the code to a higher quality level.
In this process a lot of functionality is getting
looser
The logic that forces testng and its resolved dependencies onto the
system classpath
of the forked process can be switched off by commenting out the
statement in line
1025 of AbstractSurefireMojo.java:
public void addProviderArtifactToBootClasspath( Classpath
bootclasspath )
, schrieb Kristian Rosenvold:
The logic that forces testng and its resolved dependencies onto the
system classpath
of the forked process can be switched off by commenting out the
statement in line
1025 of AbstractSurefireMojo.java:
public void addProviderArtifactToBootClasspath( Classpath
Reinhard Nägele:
Here's the JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-699
Thanks,
Reinhard
Am 14.02.2011 13:49, schrieb Kristian Rosenvold:
A jira sounds nice. I will probably change this to apply only for
guice [3.0), just to avoid creating regressions.
In other words, don't worry about
Surefire delegates all of this to TestNg and does nothing
with these things. You'll have to check if the
combination of parallel and order is supported by
asking over there.
Kristian
to., 17.02.2011 kl. 15.37 +, skrev Burns, Scott:
Hi, some of our test specify a priority at the method
I have't looked into the exact details of this, but generally if you
want to embed
HTML inside XML you have two choices; escaping or CDATA (with escaping
of ]])
Escaping or cdata *has* to be used here to get well formed xml.
There might be some reason for continuing the escaping all the way
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.8
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
I see quite a few people dabbling around with
providers, some forking existing providers to add/change features.
I am not aware if any providers have been written yet for any
of the alternate jvm languages.
The API's are not officially frozen yet, and one of the main reasons
I have not been
Please read https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/parallel-builds-in-maven-3.html
it is possible to run in parallel with plugins that are not verified
thread safe, but
there may be problems, therefore the loud warning. Since your build is
actually
failing you obviously must upgrade your plugins.
Note item 2.
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/01/maven-continuous-integration-best-practices/
Kristian
Den 28.03.2011 12:06, skrev Manuel Doninger:
We have sometimes problems, if multiple builds on Jenkins use the same
local Maven repository and if those builds download new artifacts.
Then
I haven't looked at the code, but did you try adding includes to the
config and not just excludes ? If that solves the issue you should file
a jira.
Kristian
Den 06.04.2011 19:00, skrev Igor Petruk:
Hi.
I forced surefire provider in the following way
plugin
The trick is to give the artifact a *default* version in properties so
you can override from the command line but still build without any
command line options;
properties
mygroup-myartifact.version1.1/mygroup-myartifact.version
properties
Then you can build with
fr., 15.04.2011 kl. 11.54 -0400, skrev Sony Antony:
Thank you Jason :
If 3.x local repository is not safe for concurrent access, how does maven3
implement parallel builds ( -T switch )
( maybe they decide on teh parallelism by making sure that there is no
concurrent read/write access on teh
Make sure you're using a recent version of surefire (2.8+), since newer
versions have
become far less eager at loading tests inside each fork and scanning the
classpath than
older versions.
The behaviour you describe is consitent with running an older version of
surefire. For instance, it
I know. Especially the spring messages can be a PITA.
Just file an issue under http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE and
we'll try to get another improvement for 2.8.2.
The following comes to mind:
A) Special handling of the spring messages, truncate from the END of the
first line, which is
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.9
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Remote
Resources Plugin, version 1.2.1
This plugin is used to retrieve JARs of resources from remote
repositories, process those resources, and incorporate them into JARs
you build with Maven.
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Verifier,
version 1.3
This is a shared library for use in testing various Maven components. It
allows the user to execute Maven builds as part of the testing process,
with methods supporting test preparation and assertion of results.
From what I can understand this issue is almost certainly some kind of
combinatorial explosion caused in the calculation of the dependencies.
Sample project/and or heap dumps will be required here as far as I can
understand.
As for the embedded building, you might want to take note that
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven jar
Plugin, version 2.3.2 and maven-archiver 2.4.2 in a combined release.
This plugin provides the capability to build jars, and the maven
archiver is used to create custom archives that are configured from
the POM. You can find more
Not really.
P.S: If you added some copy-task to the root project that copied all the
surefire-reports to the root project you could run surefire-reports over
the aggregate. But you're not going to get
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Kristian
on., 24.08.2011 kl. 17.06 +,
If you intend your provider to be part of the official distribution at
some time it makes sense for your provider to have the surefire parent.
Otherwise just remove the reference to the apache parent in your
provider and use any testing tool you like.
If you intent to build in the surefire
Den 05.10.2011 18:26, skrev Farrukh Najmi:
Sometime in the recent past I noticed that when I run my projects
junit tests via maven-surefire-plugin I no longer see the log messages
or println statements sent to System.err until *after* the test
completes. Since these message are important
You would have to try version 2.8.1; I will take a look at this for
2.11.
Kristian
to., 03.11.2011 kl. 08.38 -0700, skrev farrukh_najmi:
Note that I have tried this with both maven-surefire-plugin 2.9 and 2.10 and
there is no difference.
--
View this message in context:
.
Kristian Rosenvold-4 wrote:
There were some changes in the capture/buffering algorithm for test
output for surefire 2.9, which might be what you are seeing. If you are
running your tests in parallel,
this is the intended behaviour, but I assume there might have been some
change
FWIW, surefire 2.11-SNAPSHOT supports the use of JUnit @Categories,
which I believe a lot of users should be looking at for
including/excluding tests, since it allows you to tag at the
class/method level and apply multiple include/exclude filters, which
means you can
cross-cut a much more
I have one other major piece of new (exciting!) functionality I'm
adding, then just a quick
bug scrub and off we go. It will be released soon.
Kristian
Den 21.11.2011 21:50, skrev Stephen Connolly:
i cannot recall if kristian is aiming fir an 8 or 12 week average cycle...
but it is likely
Den 22.11.2011 09:36, skrev Stephen Connolly (in private message):
Does that major new piece include the per-method threading you
promised you'd deliver for 2.10 in return for me consolidating the
site generation? :-P
I said I'd do it, but not for which version ;) No. There are some pain
Den 22.11.2011 13:35, skrev Stephen Connolly:
On 22 November 2011 08:51, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@zenior.no wrote:
Den 22.11.2011 09:36, skrev Stephen Connolly (in private message):
Does that major new piece include the per-method threading you
promised you'd deliver for 2.10
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.11
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.11
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
Interesting post; you suggest that the surefire-providers should have
extensive freedoms in terms of controlling details of the fork, I
like that suggestion a lot, it's a very good extension of the current
provider api.
I'll give you some pointers into the code on this;
The
No, there are no such user-configurable extension points, so any extension
points
you need will have to be added.
That being said, there is an ongoing effort to create an official API for
surefire, but this is an ongoing process that is expected to take some
time. This does not prevent you from
The maven-module creating the zip file (the one with assembly) needs
to have dependency on the modules that produce the required jar
files.
Kristian
2012/1/20 Ashish Srivastava ashis...@yahoo.com:
Hi,
(I just subscribed to the mailing list so would appreciate if you could
reply directly
this is a bug and it /may/ not have been reported before. We had a
regression in 2.11 (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-805)
which actually broke the feature for TestNG (only in 2.11=. You may
want to test surefire 2.10 while we're releasing 2.12, which should
be pretty soon.
If it does
I've been wondering about SUREFIRE-616; what is the correct way to
actually fix this issue ?
Kristian
Den 31.01.2012 01:46, skrev Barrie Treloar:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Michael Norman
michael.nor...@oracle.comwrote:
Running maven 3.0.4 via m2e (Maven Integration for Eclipse
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Jar
Plugin, version 2.4
This plugin provides the capability to build jars.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Assembly Plugin, version 2.3
This plugin allows the user to create customized archives based on
their project and its dependencies. For example, the assembly plugin
is commonly used to create distribution archives for projects.
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven WAR
Plugin, version 2.2
The WAR Plugin is responsible for collecting all artifact dependencies,
classes and resources of the web application and packaging them into a
web application archive.
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Archiver
shared component, version 2.5.
This component is used to create custom archives that are configured
from the POM. You can find more information at:
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/
To use this component in
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.12
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
I think Jörg sums it up quite nicely. But there is also the issue
about being lenient about
what we accept and strict about what we write. So I think we might want to be
keeping our eyes on the consequences of this change; if it turns out
to be enough of a problem we can consider adding some
You probably want to to be using the released 2.2.
Kristian
2012/2/3 mschipperheyn m.schipperh...@gmail.com:
I'm using the snapshot and am suddenly seeing this error
[FATAL ERROR] Container realm = plexus.core
urls[0] = file:/C:/java/apache-maven-2.2.1/lib/maven-2.2.1-uber.jar
[INFO]
Depending on your forkMode, there was a classloading issue in 2.11
that caused tests to fail (works in all other versions).
(That was SUREFIRE-804, there may have been other permutations of
forkMode/useSystemClassLoader that were affected, I tested/closed a
few duplicates on this one)
As for
The thing is, you might be hitting two different problems, which is
where I'd really like for you to test 2.10. 2.11 had a *known* problem
with certain classloading combinations, which could cause all tests to
fail (basically all or nothing, but it would only be hitting users
with specific
]
Im Auftrag von Kristian Rosenvold
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 18:30
An: Maven Users List; christ...@schlichtherle.de
Betreff: Re: maven-failsafe-plugin incorrect reports when running
parallel tests
The thing is, you might be hitting two different problems, which is
where I'd really
You just missed the 2.12 release with your patch. After making a
release we're typically so
busy celebrating that we tend to only look for regressions for a week or two ;)
Your problem/patch seems ok. A test-case is required, and I look
forward to such a testcase since we have very little
prior
The combination in your pom is illegal. The 4.7 provider requires
JUnit 4.7 or higher.
Kristian
2012/2/19 Gogirl claudia.fr...@gmail.com:
My goal is to run different versions of Junit Framework work. Surefire
supports three different generations of JUnit: JUnit 3.8.x, JUnit 4.x
(serial
Don't even bother filing an issue, at least not here.
JUnit4.X is not compatible with 3.8.1 in the sense that you can expect
to have both jars in the same maven module and expect them to work.
JUnit 4.X can run JUnit 3 tests on itself though, so I think you can save
the calories if you're
]
Im Auftrag von Kristian Rosenvold
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 21:15
An: Maven Users List; christ...@schlichtherle.de
Betreff: Re: maven-failsafe-plugin incorrect reports when running
parallel tests
I have looked through all our current integration tests regarding
failing of build
The configuration looks correct; make sure you run mvn clean install;
maybe you have some earlier versions in target.
Kristian
2012/2/29 akhilhingane akhil.hing...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I am using maven-surefire-plugin 2.12. I intend to run test classes in
parallel and fork per test class; for
Try; in this order:
A) Use mvn help:effective-pom and analyze your surefire configuration
and see if you have multiple executions
B) Run
mvn -X clean install
cd target/surefire
grep classnameyouthinkisbeingruntwice *
The folder you are in contains all the specifications used to start
the forks,
This is undocumented, un-intentional and mostly un-nice.
Run with forkMode=always, and surefire will only fork when there are
tests to run.
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional
Yes, there is https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-844 and
probably som duplicates. This is on the short list of issues that need
to be fixed before 2.12.1, ETA undecided.
Kristian
2012/3/13 saltnlight5 saltnlig...@gmail.com:
Hi there,
When using `maven-surefire-plugin` version 2.12,
You *will* want to make sure you're running the latest versions of
most plugins, since a few leaks of this type have been fixed over the
last year or so. surefire had one.
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
You probably want to make sure you're running at least verision 2.11
of surefire. 2.12 is the latest.
Kristian
2012/5/14 Heinrichs, Dirk dirk.heinri...@capgemini.com:
Hi,
I've just joined a project which is using Maven for its builds. When running
JUnit tests, the build fails if there is a
Probably not; if you switch to classes there should be some threading.
Is there any good reason why you choose the generally inferior
methods threading ?
Kristian
2012/6/26 sreekumar sreekumarthe...@gmail.com:
Hi Team
I am try to run parallel test suitesXML files from Maven as below
Thanks for a precise problem description. Having studied the source a bit,
I found a race condition that would make this happen.
I'm still analyzing the implications a bit, but I suspect this one is the
underlying source of a few of the jiras on the parallel build, your report
was the first that
The *only* way to make surefire use threads is to set the parallel
attribute to some legal value. Use mvn help:effective-pom to see if
this is set. I can see from your log output that this is not set, so
this is something happening in your code/libs.
I might suggest using
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.12.2.
The release announcement for 2.12.1 seems
to have bounced, so it is included in this mail too.
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.12.3.
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
You should probably be looking into parallelizing your tests :) .
Either through using the parallel attribute of surefire or or
forkMode=perThread.
( see http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html)
forkMode=perThread is probably the easiest to get going with, but the
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire Plugin, version 2.12.4.
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Plugin
Testing, version 1.3 and 2.1
This release is Java7 compatible and updates all the dependencies of
plugin-testing,
especially easymock to version 2.5.2. Projects wishing to upgrade to
this version
will need to update their own
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Project Info
Reports Plugin, version 2.6
This version fixed an annoying bug in the 2.5.x range, where the
plugin was actually
downloading a noticeable part of the internet. It also adds
image/gravatar.com avatar support to
the team
The Maven team is pleased to announce the initial release of
maven-shared-utils, version 0.1
This project aims to be a functional replacement for
{{{http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils}plexus-utils}} in Maven.
It is not a 100% API compatible replacement though but a replacement
with
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
