Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/04/2017 11:47 AM, Mohan R wrote: > Hi, > > A request to gnome+rust language developers, Please keep dbus and glade > integration as easy as Vala. I enjoy writing GUI and dbus apps with Vala. > It's just awesome integration which I don't see in other language bindings. > > Thanks, > Mohan R I

Re: [Vala] Vala++

> From: Alessandro Pellizzari > Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017, 10:27 > Subject: Re: [Vala] Vala++ You seem to over talking Rust and under talking Vala. > Rust, on the other hand, is a general language, that can be used for > many things: CLI apps, OS kernels, C-compatible

Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/04/17 13:28, Al Thomas via vala-list wrote: From: Alessandro Pellizzari You seem to over talking Rust and under talking Vala. No, I don't. :) I know all you have linked. I have been following this ml since 2008. I also know the article by esr and agree, in part,

Re: [Vala] Vala++

> From: Alessandro Pellizzari > Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017, > 13:47 > Subject: Re: [Vala] Vala++ > On 04/04/17 13:28, Al Thomas via vala-list wrote: >> You seem to over talking Rust and under talking Vala. > No, I don't. :) > Rust is a hard beast to learn. It took me months

Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/04/17 08:22, Daniel Brendle wrote: On 04/03/2017 02:16 AM, Nor Jaidi Tuah wrote: https://blogs.gnome.org/chergert/2017/03/31/rustic-gnome-day-3/ There are many languages that are also fun when it comes to programming against the Glib based library stack. The more interesting part

Re: [Vala] Vala++

Am 2017-04-03 um 02:16 schrieb Nor Jaidi Tuah: > It looks like Vala is going to have > a parallel life: > > https://blogs.gnome.org/chergert/2017/03/31/rustic-gnome-day-3/ > > I hope the gnome+rust people succeed in > recreating the Vala awesomeness in Rust > (even if they don't name it after

Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/04/2017 01:47 AM, Ulink wrote: > I simply can't understand why the Gnome people seems to hate or at least > ignore Vala and instead promote Javascript or Rust or other weird stuff. Some of us in GNOME have spent many years writing programming languages and runtimes. Therefore our view is

Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/03/2017 02:16 AM, Nor Jaidi Tuah wrote: > It looks like Vala is going to have > a parallel life: > > https://blogs.gnome.org/chergert/2017/03/31/rustic-gnome-day-3/ > > I hope the gnome+rust people succeed in > recreating the Vala awesomeness in Rust > (even if they don't name it after

Re: [Vala] Starting with Vala

Hello, I humbly tried to create some programs in Vala but I made a lot of mistakes (especially on NPC which was my first "big" program that is really not optimized, clean, etc. but has the merit to try something complex) http://www.github.com/Raumy You could take a look to "check_fs" which is

Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/04/2017 12:22 AM, Daniel Brendle wrote: > There are many languages that are also fun when it comes to programming > against the Glib based library stack. The more interesting part is: will > there ever be a language that makes it also as convenient to write > gobject-introspectable

Re: [Vala] Vala++

On 04/04/17 09:47, Ulink wrote: I simply can't understand why the Gnome people seems to hate or at least ignore Vala and instead promote Javascript or Rust or other weird stuff. I really like Vala, and I also really like Rust, so don't hate me for this post. :) I think the main problem is

[Vala] Writing DLLs, was Re: Starting with Vala

> From: "r...@no-log.org" > Cc: vala-list > Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2017, 8:41 > Subject: Re: [Vala] Starting with Vala > You could take a look to "check_fs" which is better and my lastest > "graph_map". I really like what you have done here: [CCode

Re: [Vala] Vala++

Hi Christian, > Some of us in GNOME have spent many years writing programming languages > and runtimes. Therefore our view is somewhat nuanced and opinionated. As mine is ;-) But I don't understand why the Gnome guys effectively ditch vala (as it appears to me, maybe I'm wrong?). I simply can't