On Jan 7, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Edward Catmur wrote:
This patch improves HIG compliance when compiled with FEAT_GUI_GNOME:
* Close confirmation dialogs use Save/Discard/Cancel instead of
Yes/No/Cancel
* GTK_STOCK_SAVE used for Save
* Default button placed at end of
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:14:05PM +0100, Trenton Schulz wrote:
I'll look into this later. Perhaps Save/Discard/Cancel is better for
all GUIs, since you don't need to read the text to know whether yes
means save or discard. But it will break the translations.
Just being a lurker here, I
On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:14:05PM +0100, Trenton Schulz wrote:
I'll look into this later. Perhaps Save/Discard/Cancel is better
for
all GUIs, since you don't need to read the text to know whether
yes
means save or discard. But it
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:05:31PM +0100, Trenton Schulz wrote:
Would you also vote for changing the console style dialogs? I mean,
console users are normally used to press y or n, when answering these
kind of questions.
Well, don't you do that by typing :wq/:wq! or ZZ or whatever? Most of
On 1/8/07, Trenton Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
Would you also vote for changing the console style dialogs? I mean,
console users are normally used to press y or n, when answering these
kind of questions.
Well, don't you do that
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 13:03 +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Edward Catmur wrote:
* Close confirmation dialogs use Save/Discard/Cancel instead of
Yes/No/Cancel
I'll look into this later. Perhaps Save/Discard/Cancel is better for
all GUIs, since you don't need to read the text to know whether
Hi,
This patch improves HIG compliance when compiled with FEAT_GUI_GNOME:
* Close confirmation dialogs use Save/Discard/Cancel instead of
Yes/No/Cancel
* GTK_STOCK_SAVE used for Save
* Default button placed at end of message dialog, with order passed in
set as alternative button order
On 1/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also attached is a patch to disable guioptions=t (tearoff menus) when
compiled with FEAT_GUI_GNOME, also for desktop consistency.
Hey, wait! Even gvim for Windows has tearoff menus, which is a great feature,
available in no other Windows
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also attached is a patch to disable guioptions=t (tearoff menus) when
compiled with FEAT_GUI_GNOME, also for desktop consistency.
Hey, wait! Even gvim for Windows has tearoff menus, which is a great
feature,
