On Oct 13 14:06, Gary Johnson wrote:
I thought the purpose of Cygwin was to provide a Linux-like
environment for applications, so that, for example, one could simply
recompile under Cygwin an application written for Linux and not have
to rewrite the file-handling routines to recognize DOS
On Oct 13 21:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
E303: Unable to open swap file for /etc/hosts, recovery impossible
What happens is this:
On Oct 13 21:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 13 21:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[...]
Below is a patch which works for me, though I'm not sure if it's
complete enough to catch all cases. There's code for OS2 in os_unix.c
which I reused, plus a new definition
On 10/13/06, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
E303: Unable to open swap file for /etc/hosts, recovery impossible
What happens is this:
/etc/hosts is by default a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 13 21:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 13 21:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[...]
Below is a patch which works for me, though I'm not sure if it's
complete enough to catch all cases. There's code for OS2 in os_unix.c
which I reused, plus a
On Oct 13 21:53, Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 10/13/06, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
E303: Unable to open swap file for /etc/hosts, recovery impossible
What
Yakov Lerner wrote:
[...]
I mean, I tried 'ls c:\windows' in cygwin and it does not work ..
strange is it issue of version of cygwin ? I saw even
weirder differences in cygwin behaviour ... fat32 vs ntfs differences...
Maybe this is because \ have a special meaning for bash or some
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap file handling between
6.4 and 7.0 so that it works in the former but doesn;t in the latter?
memline.c was
On Oct 13 22:02, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap file handling between
6.4 and 7.0 so that it works in the former but doesn;t in the latter?
Is your 6.4
On Oct 13 16:06, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap file handling between
6.4 and 7.0 so that it works in the former
On 2006-10-13, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13 21:53, Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 10/13/06, Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a report on the Cygwin mailing list that the following message
appears when trying to open /etc/hosts in vim:
E303:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:34:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 13 16:06, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:38:16PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Interesting enough it works in 6.4 without doing anything similar to my
patch does to os_unix.c. What's different in swap
12 matches
Mail list logo
