RE: AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed?

2004-11-04 Thread Sandonato, Matthew T
No. the colon is only needed to separate IPs. -Original Message- From: M. H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 13:45 To: Sandonato, Matthew T; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed? What if I only need 1 address in there? Do I still

AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed?

2004-11-03 Thread M. H.
Hi, I was wondering what the syntax for the AuthHosts setting in the registry. I just want to allow connections from two machines. I currently have -:+192.168.0.44: To add access for an additional machine, what would I add? just a + and the additonal address after the first one?

RE: AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed?

2004-11-03 Thread Sandonato, Matthew T
This would be correct: -:+192.168.0.44:+192.168.0.54 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M. H. Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed? Hi, I was wondering what the syntax

RE: AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed?

2004-11-03 Thread M. H.
What if I only need 1 address in there? Do I still need the colon? -:+192.168.0.2: or -:+192.168.0.2 Thanks. From: Sandonato, Matthew T [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AuthHosts syntax - Colon needed? Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:44:41 -0500 This would be correct: -:+192.168.0.44

RE: AuthHosts syntax

2003-07-09 Thread ben . blackmore
: au Subject: RE: AuthHosts syntax

RE: AuthHosts syntax

2003-07-09 Thread William Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: But if you had +10.0.60.101 wouldn't it only accept a connection from that IP anyway, all others would be rejected? So does it need to have -10.0.60.100 in there? Ben According to the documentation, By default, the template is empty and connections from all hosts are

AuthHosts syntax

2003-07-08 Thread Kaciuba, Michael - AUS PER
Im working in a network environment where we are using winvnc on our pc's and servers. Currently we are using the HKLM\Software\ORL\WinVNC3\AuthHosts key to define who can use vnc on the network. Until now we have had no issues. Basically our string looks something like this

Re: AuthHosts syntax

2003-07-08 Thread ben . blackmore
] PER cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AuthHosts syntax au

RE: AuthHosts syntax

2003-07-08 Thread Barry Zubel
. *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaciuba, Michael - AUS PER Sent: 08 July 2003 09:42 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: AuthHosts syntax Im working in a network environment where we are using winvnc on our pc's and servers

Re: AuthHosts syntax

2003-07-08 Thread William Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have a question along the same lines. The syntax used for AuthHosts is +[ip-address-template] ?[ip-address-template] -[ip-address-template] I know the ? means it asks the user if they want to accept the incoming connection, but what's the difference between the +