Sorry about that, Terry,
I appear to have an extra phantom eMail account linked to vortex-l account.
I don't know what the additional eMail address might be named, but I think
it might be linked to my official address of orionwo...@charter.net. I'm
trying to contact my website provider in the
Whoa!
ALL my reply vortex eMail now says: s...@orionworks.com in the reply
setting. I don't get it. That shouldn't happen! I DIDN'T resubscribe to
vortex-l as s...@orionworks.com I'm having difficulty killing
s...@orionworks.com. Again my official address should be
orionwo...@charter.net. My
This is really strange. I'm replying to my second post. In my previous post
the reply-to said s...@orionworks.com so, I manually inserted the vortex-l
mailing list. When it returned via vortex-l, I noticed that the reply
address now seems to be pointing correctly to vortex-l. Why the difference?
I think I killed my s...@orionworks.com account
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
I had to adjust my calculations again because of failures of the previous
calculations. It is significantly simplified and the torque effect is now
much lower than in previous versions. I can no longer explain the Venusian
winds.
One thing I still wonder about is how an equilibrium could be
Probably not since you sent the unsubscribe message to Vortex-l.
You must send it to vortex-l-request for it to work.
T
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:59 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
I think I killed my s...@orionworks.com account
Regards,
Steven
Terry Sez:
Probably not since you sent the unsubscribe message to Vortex-l.
You must send it to vortex-l-request for it to work.
I immediately realized my mistake and resubmitted it to
vortex-l-request. But of course nobody will see that! I just look
dumb! So, what else is new. ;-)
I think
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I just look
dumb! So, what else is new. ;-)
Anybody with such a loving cat doesn't look dumb. Cat's do not select
dumb servants.
T
Interesting paper David,
This comment is more about the scope and/or open-endedness of the paper.
As I am reading though it, I am hoping to find any suggestions towards the
intriguing question posed in the opening - that the winds on Saturn are
incredibly fast and blow 500 m/s faster than
From the WSJ, a few minutes ago:
Egyptian Vice President Suleiman says President Mubarak has stepped
down and has delegated Egypt's affairs to the army.
Mubarak may very well be a scumbag who richly deserved to get kicked out
of office, but the proximate cause of the demise of his power is, as
Good analysis- congrats! Hopefully Egypt will not be Iranized.
It is a crime against Nature to use plants to manufacture fuels, and is
crime against human nature to burn ethyl alcohol.
Randy Mills energy source is on the way- building a new infrastructure for
the new generators will provide
Stephen
I agree with your conclusion - except one point needs to be clarified.
When corn is converted into ethanol, the protein is not lost - only the
carbos.
Brewer's yeast is a substantial by-product that actually increases the net
amount of protein over what would be available by eating
Yes, Mr. Lawrence,
Indeed, this is very on-topic.
The news is spreading like wildfire through out the internet.
I think you and Jones have pretty much nailed the pertinent issues.
We stand here wondering if Rossi and/or Mills will put out in short
order. Or maybe someone else will suddenly be
As far I remember, corn contains up to 75% starch and 10+/-2% protein.
The farmer's work is burned in great part.. Here in Romania the price of
food is also increasing fast. And we have learned that the revolutions are
systematically stolen.
For details re alcohol and what happens after a regime
Response to the query fwded by Rich Murray (appended):
I think the only people who can answer your questions are people who
attended the demo, the best person being Levi himself. But I agree
that the pump is suspicious. It looks exactly like the J5 pump you
refer to, that has a max flow rate of 2
On 02/11/2011 12:59 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
[The pump] looks exactly like the J5 pump you refer to, that has a max
flow rate of 2 gal (7.6L) per hr. In fact the only pumps that company
makes that exceed 2 gal/hr could not be mistaken for the one in the
photo. So, the only possibilities I can
We discussed this some time ago. Check the archives.
As you can see in the photos, the reservoir is sitting on a scale. They
monitor the decrease in water by grams and by the time for when refills are
added. This was done carefully and is not rocket science.
Are you implying that the
On Feb 10, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
The theory is the helium is the end of a sequence of fissions
initiated by palladium nuclei absorbing neutrons.
(end quote of Harry Veeder, Jed continues ...)
Ah. I see. And I gather it involves
The flow rate was stated as measured at 292 ml/min, or 17.5 liters/
hr. If it actually was 7.6 liter/hr then that is either fraud or
major incompetence on the part of someone.
I think there is little doubt the assumption of steam dryness is not
warranted, for the reasons discussed here
The problem is the need for replenishment. No mention of how much was added
is in the report, and since the weight of the reservoir is not mentioned
anyway, there's really nothing to falsify. The fact that it's not rocket
science does not mean no one should pay attention to it. Could they not come
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
The flow rate was stated as *measured* at 292 ml/min, or 17.5 liters/hr.
If it actually was 7.6 liter/hr then that is either fraud or major
incompetence on the part of someone.
They collected the water for 30 s and
I wrote: Please examine the supplied table. It shows that steam
that is 1.4 % water droplets by volume carries away only 5.04 % as
much heat as anticipated. That margin of error is far less than that
specified at 100% humidity for the probe used, even if its use were
valid for this
On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
I don't think the calorimetry needs to be that good if there are no
energy inputs (electrical or chemical), and the test is run long
enough. The world will pay attention to the field again only when
the talk of energy gain is replaced by
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
I don't think the calorimetry needs to be that good if there are no energy
inputs (electrical or chemical), and the test is run long enough. The world
will pay
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: Vortex-L vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 1:54:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results
I think the notion of super heavy electrons suppressing gammas and other
neuron
activation radiation,
Peter Gluck wrote:
Randy Mills energy source is on the way- building a new infrastructure for the
new generators will provide hundreds of millions of jobs
...for hundreds of millions of cold fusion powered mobile robots. ;-)
harry
The danger of robots causing losing of jobs are highly exaggerated
Computers have created many jobs for clerks..
Peter
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Peter Gluck wrote:
Randy Mills energy source is on the way- building a new infrastructure for
the
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:20:10 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
The flow rate was stated as measured at 292 ml/min, or 17.5 liters/
hr. If it actually was 7.6 liter/hr then that is either fraud or
major incompetence on the part of someone.
The difference between 17.5
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:58:58 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
No one should invest a dime in any CF scheme for
business purposes unless expert calorimetry is performed in due
diligence.
...or the device is both self-powered and producing excess power.
Regards,
Robin
It is not a typo, actually Levi's report
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGreportonhe.pdf
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGreportonhe.pdfsays 168 g in 45
seconds- that 13.4 liters per hour.
The 17.8 liters/hour value comes from Marianne Macy's report, 14g in 30
seconds. Source unknown.
Hi
Nice comments.
It will probably take months until I have reach as far as to answer your
questions
On Jupiter there are complex winds, some faster and some slower than the
planet.
I would gladly treat the winds on any planet but there is too little data on
them. I need pressure and
Well, not to get too far off the subject - but you probably heard of the
so-called Project Lucifer, which was kind of a silly conspiracy theory which
had arguable support from mystical texts.
There is the slight chance that the high winds of Saturn are already
associated with some kind of
Is it flies in Ockie's face, or just one big-ass, never-before-seen,
new-species type of fly!
:-) see below...
Jones wrote:
He finds numerous channels for fusion, and by implication, there are numerous
possible nuclear
reactions other than fusion, all at the same time. All in the same
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I think an end should be put to the con-fusion,
Hear here! :-)
T
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
...for hundreds of millions of cold fusion powered mobile robots. ;-)
Chickens.
T
Vortex must be holding up some posts. I am seeing posts in out of
time order, and quotes of posts not yet reaching me.
In response to Mark, I think resonant tunneling concepts may not
provide the simplest interpretation of what is happening. Foremost,
they do not account for the lack of
Older than thought:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-02-experts-age.html
Experts determine age of book 'nobody can read'
February 10, 2011 By Daniel Stolte
The Voynich manuscript's unintelligible writings and strange
illustrations have defied every attempt at understanding their
meaning.
Quantum pendulum trick explained Immersed in a special ultracold liquid,
swinging is faster
By Alexandra Witze Friday, January 28th, 2011
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/69281/title/Quantum_pendulum_tric
k_explained
Physicists have explained yet another quirk of the quantum world:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
“Quantum pendulum trick explained” Immersed in a special ultracold liquid,
swinging is faster
Increased momentum near the wall separating negative energy from
positive energy?
Interesting.
T
faster may mean shorter period but with a reduced amplitude.
harry
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 7:57:32 PM
Subject: [Vo]:OU candidate ? Doubt it
“Quantum pendulum trick explained” Immersed in a special ultracold liquid,
swinging
41 matches
Mail list logo
