My dear Friends,
It's Sunday and I am sending you again a new issue
of my newsletter.
Please find it at:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/07/informavores-sunday-no-464.html
Very slowly, it's popularity is increasing- thank you,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of exothermic
activity?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 06:38 PM 7/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 03:21 PM 7/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A new interview to Sergio Focardi
Greetings Vortex,
An amazing youtube video on an easy antigravity effect.
Is this real of photo shopped??? Easy and not much time to
reproduce..and extremely inexpensive. CD Disc, Batteries and Cell Phone and
a nickel for weight.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
I know quite what Rossi would have said: Too dangerous. I emptied it just
now, so it's safe to hold this up, but water condenses inside the hose,
because the steam cools, and eventually enough will build up that boiling
hot water will spurt out
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:52 PM, David Jonsson
davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Can someone help me to derive the spring constant between water molecules
based on the bulk modulus of water? It seems simple
:-)
The end was the best.
T
one of the big problems in trying to replicate is going to be the
phone. What carrier are they on, what model of phone? That will have
an effect on the frequency, which would be tied to the effect if real.
Personally, it looks like air to me, tubes hidden by the batteries.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011
That is certainly a trick. The poster of the video wrote himself the
label trick .
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 10:30:12
Jones Beene wrote [snip]If there is a dynamical Casimir effect (DCE) in any
anomalous-energy system,such that force is converted into energy (or
negative energy) in anongoing process, then it can be either hot or cold (or
net neutral) relative to an external
From Joshua:
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson;
My perception on the reactor core has always implied that the
volume of water entering the reactor core could vary.
Well, that's the difference then. But I think you're mistaken.
Rossi uses a pump designed to maintain a constant flow, and all
At 12:40 AM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
(Remember the skeptics evolution as a phenomenon is proved:
1. It's not true; 2. It may be true, but not important. 3. It's true
and important, but we have always known it.)
Here's the believers' progression:
1. The experiment proves it's true.
2.
At 03:27 AM 7/17/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of
exothermic activity?
It's unclear what Damon is responding to. However, a change in the
slope of a heating curve will generally indicate some variation in
condition, such as changed input
At 12:00 PM 7/17/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
The end was the best.
Yeah, the card and the coin completely disappear, right at the end,
showing that this was indeed a visual trick. Waste of time. That's
why I'm disclosing that here.
It's not impossible that some radio frequency phenomenon
Joshua apparently wrote:
Well, that's the difference then. But I think you're mistaken.
Rossi uses a pump designed to maintain a constant flow, and all
his calculations (including Krivit's video of him calculating
the power) assume constant flow rate. And if the flow is constant
at 5
Hello group,
All starts in the following link. It appears that the story is true, in
that the person below did actually get to visit Rossi recently:
http://ecatnews.com/?p=489#comment-70
Julian Brown
July 17, 2011 - 12:41 pm | Permalink
Rossi gave me a personal demonstration of a group of 4
I found some Julian Brown here:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360cpage=7#comment-21219
He starts a long discussion here:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497cpage=5#comment-44502
I did not find any name Julian Brown related to EPO, except for an
inventor with this name:
http://www.google.com.br/search?q=site:www.epo.org+julian+brownnum=100hl=pt-BRsafe=offrls=com.microsoft:en-USrlz=1I7GGLL_pt-BRprmd=ivnsofilter=0biw=1280bih=653
On 2011-07-17 22:16, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I did not find any name Julian Brown related to EPO, except for an
inventor with this name:
Then it's possible that it isn't his real name or that he isn't related
with EPO or other patent offices. If the latter is the case, then I
guess Rossi might
Akira posted Julian Brown's recent criticism on Rossi in which he shares
Steven Krivit's skepticism, based on lack of scientific standards of proof.
Like Krivit, he cannot say that there is no robust anomaly, but only that
the proof is weak to non-existent; and that Rossi is not only stubborn, but
Julian Brown seems to be a clown. At least he is what you guys call a
pseudoskeptic.
BTW, I refer to the Julian Brown of the EPO, not this one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1878
It seems that this EPO's Julian mentioned that he worked at Oxford
during the 80's, to make some kind of smoke screan with Julian Brown
from Oxford. They do not have anything to do with each other:
Daniel,
They are the same person.
JS Brown, formerly of Oxford is the same Julian Brown, now with the EPO.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rocha
BTW, I refer to the Julian Brown of the EPO, not this one:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1878
So, why does he uses the Oxford address? That doesn't make sense since
the EPO's Julian, according to himself, was just in Oxford only during
the 80's.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua apparently wrote:
Well, that's the difference then. But I think you're mistaken.
Rossi uses a pump designed to maintain a constant flow, and all
his calculations (including Krivit's video of him calculating
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:10 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From my POV it is conceivable that Rossi, while monitoring the January
demonstration, might have occasionally adjusted water inflow to help
maintain a consistent volume of water within the
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello group,
Andrea Rossi
July 17th, 2011 at 1:54 PM
Dear Paul Story:
Very funny: this clown, named Julian Brown, wrote me saying he was an
officer of the Patent Office and that he wanted give me suggestions.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 03:27 AM 7/17/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of exothermic
activity?
It's unclear what Damon is responding to. However, a change in the slope of
a
At 02:10 PM 7/17/2011, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Joshua:
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson;
My perception on the reactor core has always implied that the
volume of water entering the reactor core could vary.
Well, that's the difference then. But I think you're mistaken.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 12:40 AM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
(Remember the skeptics evolution as a phenomenon is proved:
1. It's not true; 2. It may be true, but not important. 3. It's true and
important, but we have always known
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
I know quite what Rossi would have said: Too dangerous. I emptied it just
now, so it's safe to hold this up, but water condenses inside the hose,
because the steam
Julian Brown wrote:
Basically, the whole set up defies even approximate quantitative
calorimetric analysis.
This is nonsensical speculation. E-Cat is designed to be a standard
boiling water reactor and boiling water reactor is exactly similar
setup than a kettle. And we know that tea pots do
From Jed:
No, he adjusts the power.
Same thing then. The key point being Rossi was constantly monitoring and
manually adjusting the power according to current conditions.
(Seat-of-the-pants adjusting, that is.) 100.1 C steam output could then
still be possible without violating the laws of
http://ecatnews.com/?p=489#comment-85
Julian Brown
July 17, 2011 - 10:25 pm
Can i ask you, for the sake of my family, to remove my submission to your blog.
It was sent in good faith, because I really care about the LENR field
and don’t want it to suffer yet another set back, but I see I may have
At 03:13 PM 7/17/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Joshua apparently wrote:
Well, that's the difference then. But I think you're mistaken.
Rossi uses a pump designed to maintain a constant flow, and all
his calculations (including Krivit's video of him calculating
the power) assume constant flow
At 04:54 PM 7/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Julian Brown seems to be a clown. At least he is what you guys call a
pseudoskeptic.
I'll be blunt. You are an idiot, Mr. Rocha.
Brown shows no signs of being a pseudoskeptic, he did not knee-jerk
reject Rossi's work, and apparently travelled to see
At 04:30 PM 7/17/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-07-17 22:16, Daniel Rocha wrote:
I did not find any name Julian Brown related to EPO, except for an
inventor with this name:
Then it's possible that it isn't his real name or that he isn't
related with EPO or other patent offices. If the
Did you read my following messages?
At 05:04 PM 7/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
It seems that this EPO's Julian mentioned that he worked at Oxford
during the 80's, to make some kind of smoke screan with Julian Brown
from Oxford. They do not have anything to do with each other:
At 05:24 PM 7/17/2011, Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, why does he uses the Oxford address? That doesn't make sense since
the EPO's Julian, according to himself, was just in Oxford only during
the 80's.
Serious Imagination Deficiency.
How come? as an argument. People sometimes use academic
At 06:21 PM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
At 03:27 AM 7/17/2011, Damon Craig wrote:
Uhhh. I give up. How is a kink in a thermal curve evidence of
exothermic activity?
It's unclear
Also an email from Oxford, included in a paper 18 years after he
left the institution.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Cude may be making an obvious error, assuming power figures from one test
apply to another.
He is. Partly my fault, since I quoted 17 kW without specifying which test I
meant. People should look here for the numbers:
At 06:33 PM 7/17/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Both of these pseudoskeptical [yada, yada, yada].
I have no idea what you said there, but I admit, I didn't try very
hard to understand it.
At 07:19 PM 7/17/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Julian Brown wrote:
Basically, the whole set up defies even approximate quantitative
calorimetric analysis.
This is nonsensical speculation. E-Cat is designed to be a standard
boiling water reactor and boiling water reactor is exactly similar
At 07:20 PM 7/17/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
http://ecatnews.com/?p=489#comment-85
Julian Brown
July 17, 2011 - 10:25 pm
Can i ask you, for the sake of my family, to remove my submission to
your blog.
It was sent in good faith, because I really care about the LENR field
and don't want it to
On 2011-07-18 02:16, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
That's quite a conclusion to jump to. Julian Brown claimed to be
employed by the EPO, but made no claim to be representing them. He's
also asked that his blog post be taken down:
I didn't investigate myself, and I was only talking about a
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Jed, it's important to read statements from critics like Cude very
carefully.
No can do. He is in my kill file. I only see snippets when other people
quote him. Life is
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Did you read, Terry, what had been put up on the blog just before his
request? I don't wonder that he's worried.
No, sorry Abd, are you speaking of the Admin post; or of all the
references by Daniel? If the
2011/7/18 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
teapots don't have a fixed water flow input. Rather, water is added
when the level declines.
This is irrelevant difference. Water flow is there only to ensure that
water level does not drop below reactor core, so that core does not
expose to
At 08:54 PM 7/17/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
However, just right in terms of exact full vaporization is
difficult to reach, from an engineering perspective . . .
Naa. It is a piece of cake. Just listen to the boiling
At 09:14 PM 7/17/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
So most of the time he now performs stress tests on his modules in
self-sustaining mode, apparently. That's an amazing claim! Just
demonstrating one of those running for a reasonable amount of time
would have rendered pointless most of the
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
Julian Brown wrote:
Basically, the whole set up defies even approximate quantitative
calorimetric analysis.
This is nonsensical speculation. E-Cat is designed to be a standard
boiling water reactor and boiling
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
You've apparently missed a lot of the discussion here. There is an issue
with wet vs dry steam, and you are probably correct about the steam value,
but all bets are off if water actually starts to overflow.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Cude may be making an obvious error, assuming power figures from one test
apply to another.
No. I'm objecting to Rothwell making exactly that assumption.
I have no problem with Rothwell arguing that the
Dear people,
How can we make sure that 1MW e-cat is true during a presentation? It
is certainly not hard to emulate the e-cat performance at home with
600W, 1KW or maybe a laboratory with a 5KW source to heat water. But
for a fake e-cat, it would be required 140KW to 1MW to emulate the big
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, it's important to read statements from critics like Cude very
carefully.
No can do. He is in my kill file. I only see snippets when other people
quote him. Life is too short to read such blather and nonsense.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not argue with ghosts.
I don't blame you, after the pathetic wet steam is not possible salvo.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear people,
How can we make sure that 1MW e-cat is true during a presentation?
That's a good question. Individual ecats have produced nothing but
controversy. If the MW reactor is just multiple ecats, and they use
I don't know if I wasn't clear or I am just not understanding you. I
am not actually questioning if the whether the objections would apply
or not but how we could objectively object by looking at videos or
reproducing small demos. Even 140KW is a bit too much of steam or even
heated water to make
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
So most of the time he now performs stress tests on his modules in
self-sustaining mode, apparently. That's an amazing claim! Just
demonstrating one of those running for a reasonable amount of time would
have
I would expect that the 1MW demo will not involve a phase-change in the
calorimetry. With Defkalion's statements as to alternate coolants being used
into a heat-exchanger, and combination heat-and-power models, the questionable
Rossi tests will hopefully be rendered obsolete.
This is presuming
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 09:14 PM 7/17/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
So most of the time he now performs stress tests on his modules in
self-sustaining mode, apparently. That's an amazing claim! Just
demonstrating one of those running
1MW demoplant will produce ca. 414°C steam. It is completely irrelevant if
it really works in scientific way or not, because it will be only a
demonstration for journalists and politicians. If you want real proof, you
can pay and preorder your own E-Cat and if you do not get what was promised,
you
Robert wrote:
The statements of Defkalion, including their alleged liquid-phase-only
testing, mean that they've
either passed Rossi in development, or they are complicit in propogating
misinformation.
Rossi is not really into the design of final products -- his 'product' is the
reactor core
65 matches
Mail list logo
