On 21/01/2012 5:50 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com
mailto:shauntaylor...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok Rossi may not be interested in private investors for Leonardo Corp
Well, we don't know that. He says it but it doesn't mean he
For what it's worth, here are the relevant links I have on Rossi's claims of
having been working with the University of Bologna...
January 21, 2011, Rossi says, We made an important test with the University of
Bologna, with whom we are going to make a 1 year research program also.
On 21/01/2012 9:28 PM, John Milstone wrote:
For what it's worth, here are the relevant links I have on Rossi's
claims of having been working with the University of Bologna...
June 18, 2011, Rossi says, In these days, together with the
University of Bologna and with my Customers, we have made
Well, maybe the scam doesn't work anything like your speculation.
Listen, that interview was a huge waste of my time. This Bryce guy knows
far less about any of this then anyone following this on the Vortex.
Maryyugo could have done a much better job then Bryce discussing why not
to invest or
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:34:07, thorium breeder said:
Can rossi achieve do it yourself isotopic separation?
That ties in to the missing detailed isotopic analysis that Sven Kullander
promised before Christmas.
I've been trying to find prices for specific Nickel isotopes, and no one seems
to be
Keef - my advice to you - is to get your act together on your real
adversary. It is GOW and not LENR. LENR is essentially correct, as science.
Yes, it rests on the vagaries of QM, but it may carry QM to the altar and
not the other way around. Check out the LENR/CANR site, because you lose
most of
On 21/01/2012 9:57 PM, Ransom Wuller wrote:
Well, maybe the scam doesn't work anything like your speculation.
Listen, that interview was a huge waste of my time. This Bryce guy knows
far less about any of this then anyone following this on the Vortex.
Maryyugo could have done a much better job
On 21/01/2012 10:11 PM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
Keef - my advice to you - is to get your act together on your real
adversary. It is GOW and not LENR. LENR is essentially correct, as science.
Yes, it rests on the vagaries of QM, but it may carry QM to the altar and
not the other way around. Check out
Shaun,
Bryce may be well respected but he is doing a very poor job regarding
his research on the technology (and LENR in general).
Regarding his calculation: This is also no prove of Rossi conducting a
scam but just leaves the possibility that there could still be something
else going on.
And
http://rossilivecat.com/all.html
Grab it quick before they take it down.
(I've saved it)
No PROOF that it is Greg Watson
but by the timing and all I am fairly confident.
It sure SOUNDS like him, and what he is tryn gto do is put together a proposal
for his investors that they put in the money
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
It should be quite obvious by now, that there are a lot of people being
separated from their money without any product testing...purely as
investors.
Under what pretext? Sales territories?
Uh Shaun, wet steam is physical impossibility. All water boilers on Earth
produce 99-95 dry steam, including Krivit's water boiler. You need to go
high pressures and high steam velocities in order to produce stable wet
steam. So please, at least you should get the basic physics right.
—Jouni
I suppose my coffee maker could be producing dry steam. But it's producing
very small quantities of it, and that small amount of steam pushes the vast
majority of the liquid water up and over the reservoir and into the coffee
grounds.
Or am I missing something?
A good example. I think it comes down to whether all of the water that
we see at the outlet, in whatever form, would have had to been converted
to water vapour at some stage in order to get there, requiring its
latent heat of vapourisation. In the case of my, and John's coffee
maker, not all
On 21/01/2012 11:12 PM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
http://rossilivecat.com/all.html
Grab it quick before they take it down.
(I've saved it)
No PROOF that it is Greg Watson
but by the timing and all I am fairly confident.
It sure SOUNDS like him, and what he is tryn gto do is put together a
proposal for
some proposition that you may comment... maybe I'm naive.
Whether as some says, heat is stored in thermal mass, the steam generated
should be superheated, thus dry ?
if steam/water is under high pressure to store or avoid boiling, when it
exit it should be superheated, thus dry ?
wet steam
you take the cost of the plant as your only parameter.
but normally the fuel is the key cost in normal cheap factory.
here fuel is nearly free
2012/1/21 Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com
It was meant to show Rossi's 1 MW plant is not a financially viable device
to generate electricity,
On 21/01/2012 11:25 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Uh Shaun, wet steam is physical impossibility. All water boilers on
Earth produce 99-95 dry steam, including Krivit's water boiler. You need
to go high pressures and high steam velocities in order to produce
stable wet steam. So please, at least you
On 21/01/2012 11:01 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Shaun,
Bryce may be well respected but he is doing a very poor job regarding
his research on the technology (and LENR in general).
Regarding his calculation: This is also no prove of Rossi conducting a
scam but just leaves the possibility that there
I'm not full of hate dude.
I strongly dislike con-artists and I think they should be locked up (humanely)
in a white room with the lights on 24 hours a day and nothing to read no TV etc.
Very humane indeed.
A much better situation than their victims find themselves in.
Many of Madoff's victims
What did this Watson do to you to make you so agro? You seem so full of hate.
Man I don't want to be around if you ever lose it
Ahem!
Re: The Wacky World of Watson!!! 7-May-09 07:41 pm
Keith wrote:
As for your overunity bollocks...so what if you have a professor of JUNK
SCIENCE that
On 21/01/2012 11:19 PM, James Bowery wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com mailto:robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
It should be quite obvious by now, that there are a lot of people
being separated from their money without any product
I think what Shaun means is the “percolator effect” and not wet steam, per se.
It seems these two are being merged together, when there is a distinction.
Actually, the percolator effect (mass transfer via gas entrainment) is FAR more
misleading than wet steam would be, if you are looking for
On 22/01/2012 12:00 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
you take the cost of the plant as your only parameter.
but normally the fuel is the key cost in normal cheap factory.
here fuel is nearly free
2012/1/21 Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com
mailto:shauntaylor...@gmail.com
It was meant to show
On 22/01/2012 12:14 AM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
I'm not full of hate dude.
I strongly dislike con-artists and I think they should be locked up
(humanely) in a white room with the lights on 24 hours a day and nothing
to read no TV etc.
Very humane indeed.
A much better situation than their victims
If you trust Rossi, then you might as well accept the numbers presented by the
unknown consultant of the secret company.
If you don't trust Rossi, then there is absolutely nothing from the October
28th test to indicate that the MegaWatt E-Cat even got slightly warm (AFAIK),
with or without the
On 22/01/2012 12:21 AM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
What did this Watson do to you to make you so agro? You seem so full of
hate. Man I don't want to be around if you ever lose it
Ahem!
Keefer,
So all this Watson guy did was to argue with you? You never gave him any
money or he never refused to
Bought something for a couple of hundreds of dollars and never got his
thing. That's all...
2012/1/21 Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com
On 22/01/2012 12:21 AM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
What did this Watson do to you to make you so agro? You seem so full of
hate. Man I don't want to be around
On 22/01/2012 12:56 AM, John Milstone wrote:
If you trust Rossi, then you might as well accept the numbers presented
by the unknown consultant of the secret company.
You mean the secret company in the US that Rossi claimed to have visited
to install the plant but somehow it slipped his mind
He meant that only 62 and 64 transmutes. So, he maximizes their quantity to
increase the energy density.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:34:07, thorium breeder said:
Can rossi achieve do it yourself isotopic separation?
That ties in to the missing
That is absurd – John.
Do you have any depth of understanding on this test, since you seem to be
coming in after all of these details have been hashed and rehashed ad
nauseum ?
These were not merely “guests” dragged in off the campus - Dozens of PhD
level scientists were there. Are they all in
Jones, I am confused. I thought you considered the 1MW as a fake given your
criticisms over the non delivery of the 1MW generator.
2012/1/21 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
That is absurd – John.
Do you have any depth of understanding on this test, since you seem to be
coming in after all of
I did a little research on this investor and so on.
From what I see:
This Bryon New Energy Group has been formed by a man called Sol
Millin. This guy once (or still?) advertised a car running on water,
using a cosmic water cell... See here:
http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/BNE.html
On 22/01/2012 12:21 AM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
The only problem here is this guy NEVER actually built one and tested
it. Prof. Clauzon and his team did build one, tested it and found out,
Keefer,
You do know this Prof Clauzon guy that you claimed is a JUNK scientist
was at Rossi's 6 Oct E-Cat
Rossi is a dodgy character, but that does not mean that it isn't working.
There are a lot of others out there with Impeccable professional
scientific reputations who are getting high-level outputs from similar Ni-H
systems.
Eg Brillioun Energy reported 2x gain in February last year at relatively
This is what I think. Just a scamer trying to get to profit from the Rossi
story in the same way that AG wanted, but none of them really were really
doing business with Rossi.
2012/1/21 Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de
I did a little research on this investor and so on.
From what I see:
This
Keefer was quoting that guy. That is not his message.
2012/1/21 Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com
On 22/01/2012 12:21 AM, Eff Wivakeef wrote:
The only problem here is this guy NEVER actually built one and tested
it. Prof. Clauzon and his team did build one, tested it and found out,
On 2012-01-21 11:58, John Milstone wrote:
For what it's worth, here are the relevant links I have on Rossi's claims of
having been working with the University of Bologna...
[...]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c-1EvJK5PQ
January 12, 2012
Rossi says, We are organizing a work with two
On 22/01/2012 1:13 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
That is absurd – John.
Do you have any depth of understanding on this test, since you seem to be
coming in after all of these details have been hashed and rehashed ad
nauseum ?
These were not merely “guests” dragged in off the campus - Dozens of PhD
Daniel, let me be clear on this:
We need to make a clear distinction between the scientific anomaly, which is
valid, and Rossi's business plan, which seems to have evolved into an
economic scam, built on top of a massive thermal anomaly that was never
ready for commercialization.
From: Daniel
On 22/01/2012 1:05 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Bought something for a couple of hundreds of dollars and never got his
thing. That's all...
I have never read that Keef has ever claimed to have bought anything
from Watson. Something else is at the root of his anger. Something that
seems to drive
Dear group:
Take a look at the background 0:12, behind the e-cat, you will see the
container at the same place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odkfAjqA4pcfeature=related
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
At 2:03 min, you will see the camera going up to down, you will see the sun
at almost the same position in the window as in the same as in the rest of
the video, including the shot at 0:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odkfAjqA4pcfeature=related
2012/1/21 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Good point Robert, and let me leave this for Milstone.
You might fool some of these guys on occasion, but not all of them for many
hours as to the main contention - that there is/was a bona fide thermal
anomaly (when the P-in became negligible).
They were invited for a number of reasons
Also, the shape of the windows made by the sun's light behind the walking
is coincident with the position of the window. See 0:44. And those are the
same thing beside Rossi during the interview. Also notice that the
illumination is about the same.
2012/1/21 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
At
I understood that. So then, to make his numbers work, he must bump up those
specific isotopes (3.6% and 0.9%) so that they make up around 35% (to explain
the 30% Copper and/or Iron he claims to be in the ash, with the natural
ratios of Nickel remaining).
IIRC, Rossi claims a total of 100g per
On 22/01/2012 1:17 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
I did a little research on this investor and so on.
From what I see:
This Bryon New Energy Group has been formed by a man called Sol
Millin. This guy once (or still?) advertised a car running on water,
using a cosmic water cell... See here:
Have any of these people reported any signs of the E-Cat actually working
during the October 28th test? Or did they simply accept the write-up produced
by Rossi and the unknown consultant for the secret company.
I find it interesting that with all the intense interest in this story, it
Exactly, you have no proof. What you have is the same thing Rossi has,
Rossi says, Smith says, Shaun says
I didn't hear half of the nonsense you are posting in that interview with
Bryce, who by the way seems as clueless to me as a lot of the Rossi
followers just on the other side of the nut
Just because GM is selling a real electric car doesn't mean that Tilley was
legitimate. (http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/)
Just because there are real companies selling real solar power systems doesn't
mean that Greg Watson (apparently AKA Aussie Guy E-Cat) and his Sun Cube was
legit.
In the specific case of Rossi, he wants to exclude nickel below 62, but
purity is not a necessity, but an optimazation. So, if he roughly excludes
most of what is bellow 62, that is good enough. Given that most of Ni is 58
and 60, he can determine a threshold of, say, Z=62, more or less, and
Very informative warning, Mary Yugo -- thanks, again -- Rich Murray,
pragmatic skeptic, always learning...
Just Levi and the AP reporter, which were the only ones that were present
in the day but not together with Danielle Passerini, outside the warehouse.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Have any of these people reported any signs of the E-Cat actually working
during the October
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:58 AM, John Milstone
john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com wrote:
(P.S. I hope I have the return address issue sorted out!)
Yeppers!
T
Good catch!
On 01/21/2012 11:06 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
At 2:03 min, you will see the camera going up to down, you will see
the sun at almost the same position in the window as in the same as in
the rest of the video, including the shot at 0:12
I wasn't aware that either one actually reported any first-hand observations
(but maybe I missed it).
In particular, I thought that the AP reporter didn't report anything, which
caused considerable consternation among those who hoped that this test, and
reporting by the AP would finally
But he was there inside, you didn't see him or Levi with the people that
were outside or briefly visited the facilities. But this is not the only
strange thing. The results from the Swedish professors should be out 1
month ago, but nothing happened.
2012/1/21 John Milstone
OK, does anyone have a ballpark figure for isotopically enriched Boron?
I agree that it seems reasonable that the difficulty of separating the isotopes
of Boron and Nickel would be comparable (but I don't know). The only problem
using Boron as an analogy is that the raw material is almost
From: John Milstone
* Even if legitimate researchers are seeing interesting results, that
doesn't necessarily mean that Rossi is legit.
No, but the blind skepticism and often silly remarks of Milstone, Yugo and
Cude do not mean anything at all.
They have demonstrated no
The price of the enrichment will be much more expansive than the raw
material. But to what extent, I don't know. But, the quantity that has to
be separated of Ni is smaller than the one of boron given that they have a
natural proportion of 5/1 of B10 to B11 against 20/1 of Ni 62+64, although
in
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Rossi may have been premature and sloppy in testing, but Ni-H is “the next
big thing” in the World Economy. Rossi has demonstrated that the Thermacore
results of the early nineties, validated by NASA in 1996, were the biggest
missed opportunity in all
I would like to thank everyone for the response and ask a few more
questions if I may.
Don`t even tankless water heaters explode everyday in America?
Has any one seen a water heater explode?
Does the rossi water heater contain toxic nickel nano particles?
Can we put his fraud behind us and
As mentioned in prior posting - Ni-64 costs about $3 per gram from a
medical supplier. We checked the ones near Rossi's former lab in NH and no
one remembers him or the name Leonardo (LTI, or EON). The reason for
checking was to see if Rossi started out this way first before finding a
less
You are giving the number for a high purity isotope, like 99.99%. In other
thread, I was talking about an extremely dirty mixture of Ni62+Ni64 and a
bunch of other isotopes, no problem if it is 50% of other stuff.
2012/1/21 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
As mentioned in prior posting - Ni-64
From: Jed Rothwell
* Yes but . . . It wasn't exactly missed. As I pointed out, Srinivasan
and other devoted a lot of effort to this system. It isn't their fault they
failed. They did not overlook it in any sense; they were unable to
replicate.
Yes but as I pointed out thereafter - they
thorium breeder thorium.bree...@gmail.com wrote:
Don`t even tankless water heaters explode everyday in America?
Tankless heater are rare, but anyway, see:
http://www.nationalboard.org/SiteDocuments/E-Publications/nb_235.pdf
Since 1990, there have been more than 30,000 boiler and pressure
*Does the rossi water heater contain toxic nickel nano particles?*
**
I don’t think so. The nickel is granulated in the micro size range. The
negative biological activity of nickel particles in this size range may not
be harmful.
*Can we put his fraud behind us and focus on nuclear contamination
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes but as I pointed out thereafter - they did not fail and their report
says they did not fail, got significant overunity and wanted to continue -
Naturally they wanted to continue, especially in view of their success with
Arata and Case, and with
Thanks for reposting that information.
So, if the fuel or ash from an E-Cat contained excess 64-Ni, that would be
compelling evidence that he really does have a new and revolutionary means of
enriching Nickel isotopes, since it seems unlikely that he would have the
resources to spike his
Do either of these methods of transmutation work with the various isotopes of
Nickel?
Are either of them able to produce the kilogram quantities, for pennies a gram,
that Rossi would require?
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
The trouble is, if only 64Ni is converted into Copper (and/or Iron?), and the
ash is 30% Copper, then wouldn't there have to be 30% 64Ni in the fuel?
Otherwise, where is the Copper coming from?
And if Rossi can convert less than 1% 64Ni into at least 30%, and 64Ni is going
for $30,000/g, I
You mean Cu 65 and Cu63. That's the ash.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Thanks for reposting that information.
So, if the fuel or ash from an E-Cat contained excess 64-Ni, that would be
compelling evidence that he really does have a new and revolutionary means
of
The Rossi technology contained some very interesting and potentially useful
trade secrets that may be well employed in the Lftr. One of them is the
very low cost enrichment of nickel favoring Ni62 an Ni64.
Previously, I have posted how tubercles can be produced using chemical
processes.
As a
No, that's not how it is. Those isotopes are too pure, that's why they are
expensive. In this case, they need much less processing, just enough to
reduce the quantity of other isotopes than Ni62 and 64.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
The trouble is, if only 64Ni is converted
found in
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/01/community-group-created-at-national-instruments-to-study-lenr/
National Instruments Community site:
https://decibel.ni.com/content/groups/lenr
Community https://decibel.ni.com/content/index.jspa?view=overview
Right. The Copper (of any isotope) is supposedly transmuted from one either
62Ni or 64Ni. Natural Nickel is about 3.6% 62Ni and about 0.9% 64Ni. So, the
active ingredients in the fuel make up less than 5% of the total.
However, the ash contains (according to Rossi) up to 30% Copper. Where
Yes, we need to know four things from Sweden: the ratio of Ni isotopes in
both the fuel and ash, and the ratio of copper isotopes in both the fuel and
ash. That will tell volumes, when compared to natural ratios.
If the copper in the ash is natural isotopic ratio - as I suspect, then that
Why to 0.04$? To 100$ would be a great thing too.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Right. The Copper (of any isotope) is supposedly transmuted from one
either 62Ni or 64Ni. Natural Nickel is about 3.6% 62Ni and about 0.9%
64Ni. So, the active ingredients in the fuel make
From: John Milstone
* Reducing the cost of a gram of 64Ni from $30,000 to $0.04 is quite an
achievement!
As Daniel implies, that is not the correct comparison.
It could easily be the case that Rossi has found that nickel with ~10% 64Ni
and ~15% 62Ni works well, and that this
*Do either of these methods of transmutation work with the various isotopes
of Nickel?*
Yes…
*Are either of them able to produce the kilogram quantities, for pennies a
gram, that Rossi would require?*
I think that Rossi coats micro particles of nickel he buys COTS. During the
tubule resurfacing
I think this is the crucial step, really, if Rossi claims are somehow to be
believed. Taking your figures to Celani's experiment, he would get peaks of
hundreds of watts and piantelli in the same range of Rossi, that is, around
thousands of watts.
2012/1/21 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Jones Beene wrote: A good magic show can fool a few journalists and grad
students and yes, Levi does not inspire confidence - but take a closer look at
the guests.
That misses one (the) major point about magic shows. When you go to Las Vegas
or Moscow to see a magician make a white tiger
There is only one cheap method to separate or enrich significantly the Ni
isotopes: by persuasion, convincing them to separate.
Rossi is sometimes, rarely telling things that are not true. But are
interesting, beyond any doubt.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Shaun Taylor shauntaylor...@gmail.com wrote:
Been a Vortex web lurker too long. Finally something that blows up Rossi,
his lunatic supporters and exposes how this scam works. . . .
I suggest you go back to lurking. Your message is nothing but speculation
and blather. You know nothing about
I don't really see the reason why not enriching Ni62 - Ni64 to 20% would be
very expensive.That's a purity level 500-5000 lower than those that leave
only one isotope pure.
2012/1/21 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
There is only one cheap method to separate or enrich significantly the Ni
True, but the $0.04/gram is, roughly, what you get when you work from Rossi's
statements (i.e. 100g and $10 per load, 10% cost is enhancement of the
catalyst, we need 30% of the rare isotopes in order to have enough material
to make an ash with 30% Copper).
The point is that it's too low a
Another issue with Rossi's claim of isotope enrichment is how he
accomplishes it. He's never commented on that though he was asked. Where
is his plant for the enrichment? What technology does he use? Can he
afford a farm of gas centrifuges? A high intensity laser setup? Who runs
it?
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM, thorium breeder
thorium.bree...@gmail.com wrote:
Has any one seen a water heater explode?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rXwcDkobUY
T
Do you know of any way to enrich Nickel, or any other metal, for a few pennies
per gram? Either there is some known way to do this, or Rossi has made a major
breakthrough (with really, really dangerous WMD overtones), or Rossi is lying.
I have yet to hear of any enrichment method that is
The most interesting set of facts that can come out of the Swedish analysis
(if we the public do get to see the report) is IF the fuel is enriched in
64Ni but the copper in the ash is natural ratio.
That will essentially mean that some kind of non-transmutation reaction is
occurring but with
What Rossi does cannot be done with heavier radioactive elements. Their
weight difference is too small. Nickel is one of the elements with the
highest range of stable isotopes.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Do you know of any way to enrich Nickel, or any other metal, for a
You don't need to do a great effort to enrich to a few percent an element
with an isotope variation of 10% of mass from the less stable to the most
stable isotope. This is not like uranium enrichment.
2012/1/21 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
Another issue with Rossi's claim of isotope enrichment
Please tell me what Rossi does! Or do we all agree that there is no commonly
known method to do what Rossi says he's doing?
Nickel has a large number of stable isotopes, but they can't be used
interchangeably to transmute into the stable isotopes (and *only* the stable
isotopes) of Copper,
I think that Rossi coats micro particles of nickel he buys commercial off
the shelf.
During the secret particle resurfacing process of these micro particles, he
uses nickel enriched in heavy isotopes in a very thin nano-sized low
quantity surface cover.
Even through the ratio of heavy nickel
I guess the problem of transmutation is another issue, not restricted to
Rossi.
2012/1/21 John Milstone john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com
Please tell me what Rossi does! Or do we all agree that there is no
commonly known method to do what Rossi says he's doing?
Nickel has a large number of stable
From: John Milstone
* I have yet to hear of any enrichment method that is within several
orders of magnitude of what Rossi *must* have, if he's really selling 100g
of fuel for $10.
Then why even attempt to believe it?
Yes that one is absolutely false beyond any reasonable doubt - and
It could be. He coats that expensive nickel around a thin shell around. A
nanometer coating would be very cheap. This is like using very cheap
medication, like some tranquilizers, which just targets a few cells and are
rated in micrograms. But in grams, they are rated in thousand$...
2012/1/21
I speculate that the cross section of proton tunneling into nickel is
increased with the proportion of heavy neutron rich nickel isotopes. It’s a
probability thing.
Reaction performance is increased in the neutron rich heavy nickel
isotopes, but the reaction still occurs in light nickel
So, you're saying that Jed Rothwell is wrong when he has stated repeatedly that
he has never caught Rossi lying about his work? That's really the basis of
everything Rothwell is claiming: Although Rossi lies about all sorts of other
things, we can trust what he says about his science.
In
I continue to be reminded of a (Isaac Asimov?) science fiction story I
read as a child where a group of scientists are shown a film of what
they are told is an anti gravity machine, which takes off, flies a bit
then blows up. They are told that the inventer, the only person who
knew how it
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
