Greetings Vortex,
For Entertainment Purposes Only:
http://ufos.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Ron Kita, Chiralex
I've seen about 5 pretty good ones, and several more not quite as, over the
years. I saw one once that had just begun to enter the upper atmosphere and
it immediately blew apart, w/o any sound. It was obviously a fairly good
distance out up over East Nv or farther.
We, as in this civilization of a race of human beings in an initial or
elementary stage of development way back in time, on earth,,, are in the
archives aboard UFO's. Now just think what it would be like to have been up
there
coordinating efforts since the time of the earliest simple lifeforms
Recent snippets from Axil:
Originally a Democrat, Adelson became a Republican
as his wealth increased. Why is it fair that I should
be paying a higher percentage of taxes than anyone
else? he once asked.
...
Adelson is a good example of why trickledown economics?
no longer
MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I couldn’t disagree more… seriously, hundreds or thousands of years? ***
*
** **
Once the scientific community (both academic and corporate) realizes that
a whole new field of science is being born, they will dive in to understand
it and
I agree with Mark,
People will not have to learn LENR, they will just replace/upgrade their
existing HVAC equipment with a device that happens to produce electricity
also and reduces their bill - no brainer.
Information access is much easier today with the internet and will aid in
the
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Mark,
People will not have to learn LENR, they will just replace/upgrade their
existing HVAC equipment with a device that happens to produce electricity
also and reduces their bill - no brainer.
That would be the energy application
Da Vinci knew that man would someday have flying machines.
I wonder how long he thought it would take. ;-)
Harry
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Mark,
People will not have to learn LENR,
I agree, but it is the minimum.
However ther is no limit to stupidity, and some zone might forbid it...
(For example, France, Germany, Europe). Not as a conspiracy, but for
quasi-religious reason, like it is done in EU. add that the lobbying of old
monopolies (think about Russian supporting
Jed,
I still disagree for several reasons:
- 200 years ago a medical doctor only had to read a few books to
assimilate all the knowledge there was at the time; that is impossible
today. Science has generated such a wealth of knowledge in ALL areas that
specializations in each field of
Excellent question Harry...
Da Vinci is one of the people I've wanted to go back in time to talk to, if
that was possible...
-m
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Migrant
Remember that Da Vinci wrote his notes upside down and backwards to keep
them secret. It would be ironic if Da Vinci ranted about “snakes and
clowns” during your conversation and that they did not understanding him
and were trying to steal his stuff.
The more things change, the more they stay
MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
- **Until the advent of the telegraph and radio, the spread of
knowledge was EXTREMELY SLOW. Communications across the Atlantic took
months, so two scientists debating their ideas on theories, or two
engineers discussing the design of a
In only a few more years, a LENR developer will be able to run quantum
mechanical nuclear system simulations on his quantum computer app using his
iPhone 10. All while he attends a meeting in persons at least virtually as
a hologram.
In a short time, we have come a long way from the heady days of
Yes, I agree,
Nowadys it is nicely packaged in a photoshopped depiction of whatever, an can
be preordered there:
http://www.e-cataustralia.com/order-and-buy/domestic-10kw/
'Pre-Order your unit here.'
No obligation, no prepayment
Fill in the form below, and we
will list you in our database
Sorry, still not convinced!
Your example is too narrow/simplistic, and doesn't capture the actual
process of how scientific knowledge advances.
Science does NOT happen with a simple, scientist#1 publishes paper;
scientist#2 reproduces. that is only a small part.
You state:
It was no
Polarizable vacuum analysis of electric and magnetic fields
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.1305.pdf
--
ABSTRACT
In summary, according to the analysis of the energy and force of the electric
and magnetic fields on the basis of vacuum polarization, it is concluded that
an
MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Now we have another process to go thru in order to publish:
**- **he takes a week or two to write it up and sends it to the
editor in England (6 weeks)
**- **the editor then sends copies to peers who have the
expertise
Sweden and Australia look to be taking prelim orders for units. But
the Aussie site might be the dubious GW.
I wonder why we see no others?
T
Jed points out:
They did not do that stuff back then, for the obvious reason that it would
take too long. The Royal Society got letters from their members and
published them verbatim. There was nothing like modern peer-review.
Yes, I understand, but that means that the paper was not even
Maybe because there is no product that exists.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 22 July 2012 9:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Cats for Sale
Sweden and Australia look to be taking prelim orders for units. But
the Aussie site
21 matches
Mail list logo
