I ran across an interesting recent paper on the collapse of coherent
dipolar BECs when subject to confinement within an optical lattice.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.5176v1.pdf
Since Rydberg matter can act as a condensate if you remove the heat, I
thought this was applicable. I realize the leap of
Like, I said, I wish these guys were healthier...
DePalma's partner with the magnetic motor, also an MIT graduate, Ed Delvers
dies at age 52 of apparent Acute Asthma Attack
http://www.scribd.com/doc/86710207/Bruce-Depalma-History
Another Magnetic motor guy Ed Gray also met an untimely death
This is a good find with possible relevance for Ni-H, Stewart, but many
observers will have a different take on how far one can take the BEC due to
thermal issues.
The classic dipolar boson and probably the only one which has a chance to
form a BEC at high temperature, since it has greatly
At 11:29 PM 9/2/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
http://www.canada.com/technology/Ship+historic+crossing+signals+extent+Arctic+melt/7176411/story.htmlhttp://www.canada.com/technology/Ship+historic+crossing+signals+extent+Arctic+melt/7176411/story.html
Canadians are romantically inspired by all those
I understand and agree. I also understand that fusion also has thermal
issues since it typically occurs at millions of degrees Kelvin.
Maybe DGT's trojan horse theory is correct, who knows at this point.
On Monday, September 3, 2012, Jones Beene wrote:
This is a good find with possible
An arcane concept - the Goldstone boson, could be one key to understanding
the emergent nanomagnetism hypothesis for energy gain in Ni-H. The energy
transfer originates from strong force and QCD color change dynamics, and
therefore from the nuclear pion (via slight depletion of proton mass) then
I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in this group, but aside from
his theoretical work, his ICCF-17 paper proposes three experiments along
these lines. They are: (a) Determine the velocity distribution of deuterons
in metals, which he states is expected to be different from an ideal gas.
: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2012 9:29:43 PM
Subject: [Vo]:The Northwest Passage
To seek a Northwest Passage at the call of many men
To find there not a road back home again.
To find there BUT THE road back home again.
(there's also a never-sung last verse)
I was visualizing electron screened fusion between two protons and came up with
an interesting thought experiment. In an earlier post on vortex I captured a
demon and put it to work in an effort to understand fusion from a slow point of
view. I was searching for an answer to some of my
At 12:03 PM 9/3/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in
this group, but aside from his theoretical work,
his ICCF-17 paper proposes three experiments
along these lines. They are: (a) Determine the
velocity distribution of deuterons in metals,
which he states
At 12:03 PM 9/3/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in this group, but aside
from his theoretical work, his ICCF-17 paper proposes three
experiments along these lines. They are: (a) Determine the velocity
distribution of deuterons in metals, which he states
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
wrote:
My don't try this at home variation would be making some very
highly loaded PdD and then whacking it with a sledge hammer.
Someone, I think more than one researcher, has admitted to trying this.
T
This is by far the simplest looking theory I've seen for LENR. It would seem
Occham's Razor is in play here, especially when the theory is contrasted with
Widom-Larson.
How do you test it?
--- On Mon, 9/3/12, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jones Beene
Energy comes from proton mass depletion
So... the way to test this theory is to weigh the thing before after the
experiment? Does any LENR researcher have equipment sensitive enough to detect
the difference in proton mass depletion?
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
My don't try this at home variation would be making some very
highly loaded PdD and then whacking it with a sledge hammer.
Someone, I think more than one researcher, has
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
My daughter spent time in New Zealand. She says the national slogan there
should be: Hey, let's try it! Why not?
Kind of like the infamous redneck last words, Hey, Bubba, watch this!
T
Or Hey, what's this button do?...
On Monday, September 3, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell
jedrothw...@gmail.comjavascript:;
wrote:
My daughter spent time in New Zealand. She says the national slogan there
should be: Hey, let's try it! Why not?
Mike confirmed that story. It wasn't my imagination that he said that. He
said they were making micro-electrodes by stretching a (molten) hollow
glass fiber as fast as they could before it cooled.
- Jed
hello,
here is interesting and easy concept for perpetual motion machine using
magnets. Problem: why this is not accepted as perpetual motion machine? I do
not see anything wrong with this concept, but it clearly produces more
rotational energy that easily overcomes the friction.
Evolution
Le Sep 3, 2012 à 2:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com a écrit :
Mike McKubre says that he first met Martin Fleischmann, there were several
students in the hallway firing a bow and arrow for some sort of experiment.
It looked foolhardy. Mike decided it was just the place for him.
I
2012/9/3 Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
hello,
here is interesting and easy concept for perpetual motion machine using
magnets. Problem: why this is not accepted as perpetual motion machine? I
do not see anything wrong with this concept, but it clearly produces more
rotational
Aside from the issue of getting an electron be modified as you describe,
the electron would tend to be taken up into the s1 orbital by one of the
protons, forming a stable 1H atom, would it not? In other words, you're
describing a metastable state, like the proverbial dog who starves to death
Yeah, this might be interesting enough to motivate another few weeks of
frantic reading. And I just got done with electron capture, sheesh. ;-)
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:06 PM, helloke...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Energy comes from proton mass depletion
So... the way to test this theory is to weigh
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Make him run that for some years and he might be slightly more convincing.
Superfluid He can rotate for weeks without problem.
Unfortunately, I have way too much experience with these sorts of
things. This is
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Make him run that for some years and he might be slightly more convincing.
Superfluid He can rotate for weeks without problem.
Unfortunately, I
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
the question is could the device generate enough electricity to keep
the magnets magnetised?
Two years of research has shown me that the magnetic cycle is
conservative. IMO, no.
T
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
However I do not think that it is anymore complex idea than refrigerator
magnet that is doing endless work against gravity or electron that can orbit
nucleus without losing it's energy.
In your example no work is
Ever seen a locomotive?
I have made this mistake as well. What many of us perceive of as steam is
actually water condensation as H2O, as a gas, begins to condense back as
into a liquid state. Real seam is invisible.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Well - yes - the theory is falsifiable in exactly this way, but of course -
you only do mass spectrometry on the hydrogen fill not the entire device.
And yes - at least I have heard that SRI has an instrument sensitive enough
to do this kind of measurement on hydrogen - but for whatever
You certainly are asking the correct questions if you assume that I am
proposing a real example.
Of course it is not possible to actually perform the experiment as described.
The thought process and experiment was mainly intended to demonstrate that
shielding of charges might actually result
Just a couple noteworthy items from my research for those few of you that
cannot get enough of my black hole/collapsed matter theory of CF.
A 2008 study considered the internal mass of a black hole to be very
similar to a dense Bose Einstein Condensate, not necessarily a singularity.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:49 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is apparent that the oblong shape would result in a strong dipole
behavior provided that that nucleus is not in the center. The references
that have been suggested all show the nucleus of the atom as located at one
The underlying major hypothesis for ultimate gain is mass-to-energy
conversion, but with little or no fission, beta decay, non-reversible
fusion, or transmutation. There can be slight transmutation from QM
tunneling but far from sufficient to account for gain. The proton mass is
not quantized and
This is an interesting device. It appears that the energy stored by the magnet
at the top in its beginning location is converted into angular energy of motion
of the drum .There is some left over to keep the magnet moving up and down as
well.
There must be a substantial magnetic force
Technically a massive or a charged object moving in a circular path should
emit radiation, gravitational or electromagnetic.
The gravitational radiation emitted by a planet is extremely small so the
energy loss is not going to affect the orbit dynamic even over enormous
period of times. In
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
A classical electron should emit a lot of radiation orbiting a so high
velocity around the nucleus of an atom and should collapse into the nucleus
in a very short time.
This doesn't happen and it puzzled the
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would be ideal if the pseudo neutron can be formed which would then
penetrate the nucleus but I am afraid that the energy equations would not
balance. If there are two different paths to the same ultimate result,
Harry, I think that conventional or classical physics is just wrong, because it
just assumes gravity without explaining it. In real physics we cannot just
assume such things, as giovanni mentioned. If you hold two 10 kg hand weights
stationary with straight hands in horizontal orientation, then
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
However neodyme magnets are very resilient and I would say that produced
energy exceeds by far the energy required to make the magnet in the first
place. I would say by factor of 1000 or more.
Actually, the
No quantum mechanics doesn't explain why the electron doesn't emit, it just
states that that is the case for certain fixed orbits.
Some explanations invoke the wave nature of the electrons and state that
the orbitals are stationary states similar to standing waves in a pipe.
It is an heuristic
Do you favor the mystery energy source claims of LeClair and Papp? Cheers:
axil
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The underlying major hypothesis for ultimate gain is mass-to-energy
conversion, but with little or no fission, beta decay, non-reversible
On Sep 4, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Giovanni Santostasi gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens is that your muscles are like springs and they are getting
stretched by the weight. When they are stretched beyond a point the muscle
pulls back and then relaxes, this over and over again and this
How is this an epicycle?
A biological system is complicated and even if it has to obey the law of
physics, it is not usually a good starting example to introduce basic
physics concepts.
In some cases (teaching physics to biomed students) could be a good idea to
mention examples like this in
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would be ideal if the pseudo neutron can be formed which would then
penetrate the nucleus but I am afraid that the energy equations would not
balance. If there are two different paths to the same ultimate result,
In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:46:26 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
All the more or less workable hypotheses rely on this principle in one form or
another.
Here is a short list:-
1) Horace Heffner's Deflation Fusion.
2) Varieties of Mills' Hydrino Theory.
3) Hydrex
4) Ed Storms.
You have generated an excellent list Eric which includes many reactions that I
have been analyzing. The latest demon run that I posted reduced my concerns a
bit since it suggested that the barrier energy can be reclaimed after the
fusion event has been initiated. This might help explain some
Dear Axil,
A very interesting metaphor- I think the arrogant doctors are the
equivalent of the LENR+ skeptics today. Actually it is a case of
people who*know
*vs the people who *learn* and, unfortunately this
dichotomy is present even inside the CF/LENR
community.
In the Garfield story was there
Eric, my last response hints at a way to balance the energy books. My strange
thought experiment suggests that the energy required to penetrate the coulomb
barrier is the same with borrowed help coming from the shielding electrons.
The shielding could effectively lower the barrier
Thanks Robin. I guess that we can assume that shielding will be required one
way or the other. My main revelation is that much of the barrier energy can be
temporarily borrowed but needs to be repaid once fusion occurs.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To:
49 matches
Mail list logo
