On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
We found that when several materials are subjected to conditions expected
and found to produce voids, and then exposed to H2, a source of radiation
results that is consistent with the radiation reported by previous
The theoretical introduction seems strange.
the claim about spin incompatibility seems to ignore the neutrino in the
equation?
anyway, theory is not so important, experiment decide.
I'm a bit annoyed that so many papers focus on hypothesis, while the facts
are blatant and not accepted.
Is it
Decadence? Koalemos was always invincible.
Peter
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
The theoretical introduction seems strange.
the claim about spin incompatibility seems to ignore the neutrino in the
equation?
anyway, theory is not so important,
From: Eric Walker
In the paper, Storms and Scanlan describe the Geiger-Muller
activity of unknown species that appear to have half-lives of 58 and 109
minutes, respectively; they wonder whether they're actually the same
species, observed under
An important detail about the Deep Dirac Layer, in the context of “halo”
nuclei is that the electron orbit radius around the proton is only ~ 5 fm,
which is in the range where it could be bound as a virtual neutron halo
nucleus (upper range). Of course, the leap of faith is that this state -
which
Hello group,
The 8-page article published on the November issue of Popular Science is
now publicly available for reading on the official PopSci website. For
sure, user reactions in the comment section don't seem very
enthusiastic, to say the least:
Yeah, I suppose you could say that we're all aliens, except that Obama is
an illegal Alien, now fraudulently serving as the President (I'm so proud).
Of course there alot of so-called people in this country here illegally, and
Obama is in good company.
On 2012-10-23 18:05, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Not related with the opening post, but this came just in from Google Alerts:
http://discovermagazine.com/2012/nov/27-big-idea-bring-back-the-cold-fusion-dream
A cautiously neutral article on cold fusion on Discover Magazine, mainly
I can't let this go. Last year I posted this revealing investigation
of how N-rays were debunked in
an unprofessional, psuedo-scientific manner.
An englishman plays the role of chief debunker.
You should read it jones.
Harry
The Theatre of the Blind: Starring a Promethean Prankster, a Phoney
sorry it was an american, not an englishman. I should reread my own posts. ;-)
Harry
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't let this go. Last year I posted this revealing investigation
of how N-rays were debunked in
an unprofessional,
Hawking radiation from dark matter has been around a lggg time.
Very low red-shifted energy, weak effects, Neutrinos. Good stuff if you
can contain it...
Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Harry Veeder wrote:
sorry it was an american, not an englishman. I
Harry, I get only a black page when I click on the URL ?
... but my first thought is- letting an Englishman be the chief debunker of
a Frenchman is a bit unfair, no?
And ... Speaking of Theater of the Blind, and also of Ce qui circule
vient autour
the following explains how believing becomes
On 2012-10-22 14:14, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
As a side note, it appears that the entity which funded Michael A.
Nelson's traveling expenses was not the Free Energy Foundation, but
rather the New Energy Foundation. This correction comes from Mark
Gibbs of Forbes. See [1] and
I uploaded a version of this paper with some revisions and corrections.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
- Jed
At 09:05 AM 10/23/2012, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
The 8-page article published on the November issue of Popular
Science is now publicly available for reading on the official PopSci
website. For sure, user reactions in the comment section don't seem
very enthusiastic, to say the
At 11:26 AM 10/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I uploaded a version of this
paper with some revisions and corrections.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEnatureofen.pdf
I had to read it several times to figure out the relationship between
GM#1 and GM#2.
Let me summarize my current understanding
I uploaded a post with links to all three articles and eCat news,
conveniently located in one place:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1356
Ed Storms is stuck on fusion in his thinking about radiation coming from
hydrogen concerning its nuclear effects on a cracked metal lattice.
This unsupported preconception is undercutting an objective examination of
what nuclear transmutation processes are happening in the lattice.
The hydrogen
At 12:36 PM 10/23/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I uploaded a post with links to
all three articles and eCat news, conveniently located in one place:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1356
You might add Wired's Sep 14 --- now archived
Cold fusion: smoke and mirrors, or raising a head of
steam?
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
And apart from the usual MY response http://www.popsci.com/science/**
article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-**black-box#comment-147923http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box#comment-147923
Mary Yugo wrote here:
His [Rossi's] marks
He should get some physics education or just quit babbling about something
he doesn't understand, damn!
2012/10/23 Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com
A long disclaimer from Krivit ! http://www.popsci.com/science/**
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
You might add Wired's Sep 14 --- now archived
Cold fusion: smoke and mirrors, or raising a head of steam?
Might as well add it.
Done.
- Jed
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote, regarding this:
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box#comment-147925
[Krivit] should get some physics education or just quit babbling about
something he doesn't understand, damn!
Yeah. Well he is not babbling about
What I really mean is that he ends up adding confusion to the mess. If not
even WL, the authors, can answer Abd's objections, what's to say about
Krivit?
2012/10/23 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote, regarding this:
From: Alan J Fletcher
GM#1 and GM#2 are no longer detecting radiation from the Specimen, but are
detecting the decay of K40 in the Mica window.
So the the discovery is that the radiation from the specimen is doing
something to K40 -- which decays with a half-life of 109 minutes.
Does
Alan, if you look at the photograph, you see GM#1 on the apparatus,
where it is clearly shown in the diagram (Fig. 5), and GM#2 is
hanging by a wire off to the right , as clearly stated under the
photograph.
GM#2 never detects radiation from the sample but can detect radiation
from GM#1
From Jed:
...
... and in this case [Krivit] he publishes an e-mail from Featherstone to
himself . . .
all of which is bad form.
As the British say, it is not on. (They used to say that.) Meaning it isn't
done in polite society.
According to Krivit, this is what Featherstone asked him:
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
What I really mean is that he ends up adding confusion to the mess. If not
even WL, the authors, can answer Abd's objections, what's to say about
Krivit?
Absolutely right.
Quoting one of Krivit's papers:
Allan Widom and Lewis Larsen propose that, in
Jones,
Sorry it was the american physicist Wood who did the debunking but if
I remember correctly according to Malcolm Ashmore he went to france at
the request of englishmen.
Some browsers don't seem to handle pdf links well.
The link works in google chrome if you copy and paste the link into
I wrote:
he keeps dreaming up assumptions, changing them into facts, and then
finally claiming that everyone alive at the time knew these were facts and
agreed with his views. This is contractual history gone berserk.
That was a spell-check error. Meant counter-factual history.
- Jed
It is time for a change in my experimentation. I spent a lot of time and
energy with the sodium carbonate electrolyte and DC current without being able
to report any proven excess power. There is evidence that the Borax
electrolyte might lead to more definitive results so that is what I began
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:05:09 -0400:
Hi
Jed,
[snip]
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJthefuturem.pdf
You wrote:
Nothing motivates people more than the prospect of making billions of dollars.
...you'd be surprised how wrong that is. I have pointed out to
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:46:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It looks like Aliens (interstellar types) favour Romney for
President.
http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/romney-temp/
...maybe they're just predicting the winner, to prove who they are? ;)
Regards,
Robin van
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
And apart from the usual MY response http://www.popsci.com/science/**
article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-**black-box#comment-147923http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box#comment-147923
(this time it
Krugman anticipate this.
http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:39 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:46:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It looks like Aliens (interstellar types) favour Romney for
Sorry for not including this in the first mail, but I have to follow up
because it gives the flavor of the thing:
The remainder of this paper is, or will be, or has been, depending on the
reader's inertial frame, divided into three sections.
;-)
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Jeff
36 matches
Mail list logo
